Evaluation of Patient Positioning during Digital Tomosynthesis and Reconstruction Algorithms for Ilizarov Frames: A Phantom Study.

Digital tomosynthesis Ilizarov Metal artefacts Metallic rod Peak signal-to-noise ratio X-ray

Journal

Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
ISSN: 1828-8936
Titre abrégé: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101299515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 28 12 2020
pubmed: 29 12 2020
medline: 29 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Metallic components from circular external fixators, including the Ilizarov frame, cause artefacts on X-rays and obstruct clear visualisation of bone detail. We evaluated the ability of tomosynthesis to reduce interference on radiographs caused by metal artefacts and developed an optimal image acquisition method for such cases. An Ilizarov frame phantom was constructed using rods placed on the bone for the purpose to evaluate the benefits of tomosynthesis. Distances between the rod and bone and the angle between the rod and X-ray tube orbit were set at three different levels. Filtered backprojection images were reconstructed using two different features of the reconstruction function: THICKNESS-- (CONTRAST4) and THICKNESS++ (METAL4); the first is suitable for improving contrast and the second is suitable for metal artefacts. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) was used during image evaluation to determine the influence of the metallic rod on bone structure visibility. The PSNR increased as the angle between the metal rod and the X-ray tube orbit and the distance between the metallic rod and bone increased. The PSNR was larger when using THICKNESS-- (CONTRAST4) than when using THICKNESS++ (METAL4). The optimal reconstruction function and image acquisition determined using the metallic rod in this study suggest that quality equal to that without the metallic rod can be obtained. We describe an optimised method for image acquisition without unnecessary acquisition repetition and unreasonable posture changes when the bone cannot be adequately visualised. Abe Y, Shimada M, Takeda Y,

Identifiants

pubmed: 33363634
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1446
pmc: PMC7744665
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-6

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Références

Radiology. 1990 Oct;177(1):89-93
pubmed: 2399344
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Feb;44(2):179-95
pubmed: 25223361
Phys Med. 2017 Oct;42:28-38
pubmed: 29173918
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2015 Oct;26(10):2275-90
pubmed: 25616080
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004 Apr;13(4):600-12
pubmed: 15376593
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2007 Sep 20;63(9):1099-104
pubmed: 17917363
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2018 Nov;13(3):137-149
pubmed: 30220005
Int Orthop. 2013 Aug;37(8):1533-9
pubmed: 23712212

Auteurs

Yuki Abe (Y)

Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Makoto Shimada (M)

Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Yoshihiro Takeda (Y)

Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Taisuke Enoki (T)

Department of Educational Collaboration, Health and Safety Sciences, Osaka Kyoiku University, Kashiwara, Osaka, Japan.

Kumiko Omachi (K)

Department of Radiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.

Shuji Abe (S)

Department of Radiology, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Osaka, Japan.

Classifications MeSH