How Speakers Orient to the Notable Absence of Talk: A Conversation Analytic Perspective on Silence in Psychodynamic Therapy.

conversation analysis psychodynamic therapy psychotherapy process research silence single case study

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 18 07 2020
accepted: 26 10 2020
entrez: 28 12 2020
pubmed: 29 12 2020
medline: 29 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Silence has gained a prominent role in the field of psychotherapy because of its potential to facilitate a plethora of therapeutically beneficial processes within patients' inner dynamics. This study examined the phenomenon from a conversation analytical perspective in order to investigate how silence emerges as an interactional accomplishment and how it attains interactional meaning by the speakers' adjacent turns. We restricted our attention to one particular sequential context in which a patient's turn comes to a point of possible completion and receives a continuer by the therapist upon which a substantial silence follows. The data collection consisted of 74 instances of such post-continuer silences. The analysis revealed that silence (1) can retroactively become part of a topic closure sequence, (2) can become shaped as an intra-topic silence, and (3) can be explicitly characterized as an activity in itself that is relevant for the therapy in process. Only in this last case, the absence of talk is actually treated as disruptive to the ongoing talk. Although silence is often seen as a therapeutic instrument that can be implemented intentionally and purposefully, our analysis demonstrated how it is

Identifiants

pubmed: 33364999
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584927
pmc: PMC7750524
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

584927

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Knol, Koole, Desmet, Vanheule and Huiskes.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Psychother Res. 2010 Sep;20(5):495-510
pubmed: 20552533
Psychother Res. 2018 Mar;28(2):203-216
pubmed: 27148916
Trials. 2017 Mar 14;18(1):126
pubmed: 28292331
Int J Psychoanal. 1958 Sep-Oct;39(5):416-20
pubmed: 13610513
Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 Sep;22(7):1091-104
pubmed: 12238247
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Apr;59(4):513-24
pubmed: 12652641
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 05;11:318
pubmed: 32194480
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1961 Jan;9:44-55
pubmed: 13684264
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1961 Jan;9:7-43
pubmed: 13788162
J Affect Disord. 2014 Dec;169:128-43
pubmed: 25194781
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Jun;61(3):373-80
pubmed: 8326037
J Anal Psychol. 2019 Nov;64(5):798-822
pubmed: 31659766

Auteurs

A S L Knol (ASL)

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Tom Koole (T)

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Health Communication Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Mattias Desmet (M)

Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Stijn Vanheule (S)

Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Mike Huiskes (M)

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH