Comparison of treatment retention and response to secukinumab versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis.


Journal

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 08 2021
Historique:
received: 21 08 2020
revised: 26 10 2020
pubmed: 29 12 2020
medline: 24 8 2021
entrez: 28 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare treatment retention and response to secukinumab vs adalimumab, including the other four TNF inhibitors (TNFi) as comparators, in PsA. All patients with PsA starting secukinumab or a TNFi in 2015-2018 were identified in the biologic registers of the Nordic countries. Data on comorbidities were linked from national registers. One-year treatment retention and hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment discontinuation were calculated. The proportion achieving a 6 month 28-joint Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA28) remission was determined together with odds ratios (ORs) for remission (logistic regression). Both HRs and ORs were calculated with adalimumab as the reference and adjusted for baseline characteristics and concurrent comorbidities. All analyses were stratified by the line of biologic treatment (first, second, third+). We identified 6143 patients contributing 8307 treatment courses (secukinumab, 1227; adalimumab, 1367). Secukinumab was rarely used as the first biologic, otherwise baseline characteristics were similar. No clinically significant differences in treatment retention or response rates were observed for secukinumab vs adalimumab. The adjusted HRs for discontinuation per the first, second and third line of treatment were 0.98 (95% CI 0.68, 1.41), 0.94 (0.70, 1.26) and 1.07 (0.84, 1.36), respectively. The ORs for DAPSA28 remission in the first, second and third line of treatment were 0.62 (95% CI 0.30, 1.28), 0.85 (0.41, 1.78) and 0.74 (0.36, 1.51), respectively. In the subset of patients previously failing a TNFi due to ineffectiveness, the results were similar. No significant differences in treatment retention or response were observed between secukinumab and adalimumab, regardless of the line of treatment. This suggests that even in patients who have failed a TNFi, choosing either another TNFi or secukinumab may be equally effective.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33367900
pii: 6053174
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa825
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors 0
secukinumab DLG4EML025

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3635-3645

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Ulf Lindström (U)

Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Bente Glintborg (B)

DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Daniela Di Giuseppe (D)

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Tanja Schjødt Jørgensen (T)

Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Bjorn Gudbjornsson (B)

Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Kathrine Lederballe Grøn (K)

DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sella Aarrestad Provan (S)

Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Brigitte Michelsen (B)

Department of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.

Merete Lund Hetland (M)

DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Johan K Wallman (JK)

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Dan Nordström (D)

Department of Medicine and rheumatology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Nina Trokovic (N)

ROB-FIN, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.

Thorvardur Jon Love (TJ)

Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Niels Steen Krogh (NS)

Zitelab, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Johan Askling (J)

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Lennart T H Jacobsson (LTH)

Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Lars Erik Kristensen (LE)

Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH