A Real-World Assessment of Outcomes in Schizophrenia Patients According to Treatment Response.


Journal

The primary care companion for CNS disorders
ISSN: 2155-7780
Titre abrégé: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101547532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 18 05 2020
accepted: 05 08 2020
entrez: 28 12 2020
pubmed: 29 12 2020
medline: 16 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To describe and compare demographics, outcomes, and comorbidities among schizophrenia patients according to treatment response. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the United States through the Adelphi Schizophrenia Disease Specific Program from January to May 2014. Participating physicians provided information on the first 10 schizophrenia patients aged ≥ 18 years they saw in daily clinical practice; these patients were invited to voluntarily complete a patient self-completion form. Patients were considered partial responders or responders based on the physician-reported Clinical Global Impressions improvement scale. Regression analyses were performed to identify potential drivers of response and the clinical and humanistic outcomes associated with response. 150 physicians provided data on 433 partial responders and 872 responders; 185 partial responders and 415 responders completed a patient self-completion form. A significant predictor of response was always being adherent with the medication regimen (P < .001). Positive symptoms (P = .006) and moderate (P = .004) or severe (P = .002) illness severity were significant predictors of inadequate response. Responders were more likely to have better EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 Dimensions) visual analog scale, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, and work productivity and impairment scores (all P < .05). Partial responders were more likely to have significantly poorer clinical and quality of life outcomes compared with responders. Improved therapeutic approaches, either new therapies or optimized treatments, could lead to both better outcomes and improved adherence in this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33369293
doi: 10.4088/PCC.20m02681
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Copyright 2020 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Auteurs

Rezaul Khandker (R)

Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Zaina P Qureshi (ZP)

Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Jason Shepherd (J)

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom.

Salome Samant (S)

Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Farid Chekani (F)

351 North Sumneytown Pike (Mailstop: UG-2MW05), North Wales, PA 19454. farid.chekani@merck.com.
Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Hollie M L Bailey (HML)

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH