Optimal adjustment of the human circadian clock in the real world.
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
04
06
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
revised:
14
01
2021
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
9
2
2021
entrez:
28
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Which suggestions for behavioral modifications, based on mathematical models, are most likely to be followed in the real world? We address this question in the context of human circadian rhythms. Jet lag is a consequence of the misalignment of the body's internal circadian (~24-hour) clock during an adjustment to a new schedule. Light is the clock's primary synchronizer. Previous research has used mathematical models to compute light schedules that shift the circadian clock to a new time zone as quickly as possible. How users adjust their behavior when provided with these optimal schedules remains an open question. Here, we report data collected by wearables from more than 100 travelers as they cross time zones using a smartphone app, Entrain. We find that people rarely follow the optimal schedules generated through mathematical modeling entirely, but travelers who better followed the optimal schedules reported more positive moods after their trips. Using the data collected, we improve the optimal schedule predictions to accommodate real-world constraints. We also develop a scheduling algorithm that allows for the computation of approximately optimal schedules "on-the-fly" in response to disruptions. User burnout may not be critically important as long as the first parts of a schedule are followed. These results represent a crucial improvement in making the theoretical results of past work viable for practical use and show how theoretical predictions based on known human physiology can be efficiently used in real-world settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33370265
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008445
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-20-00951
pmc: PMC7808694
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1008445Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: O.W. has given talks at Unilever events and received honorariums/travel expenses. She and D.B.F. are the CEO and CSO of Arcascope. Both they and the University of Michigan are part owners of Arcascope. Arcascope did not sponsor this research.
Références
J Biol Rhythms. 1999 Dec;14(6):493-9
pubmed: 10643746
J Appl Physiol. 1953 Nov;6(5):283-91
pubmed: 13108824
Am J Physiol. 1982 Jan;242(1):R3-17
pubmed: 7058927
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 10;10(4):e1003523
pubmed: 24722195
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Sleep. 2003 May 1;26(3):342-92
pubmed: 12749557
J Biol Rhythms. 2008 Aug;23(4):374-6
pubmed: 18663244
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000418
pubmed: 19543382
Nature. 1991 Mar 7;350(6313):59-62
pubmed: 2002845
J Biol Rhythms. 1999 Dec;14(6):532-7
pubmed: 10643750
J Theor Biol. 2004 Oct 21;230(4):521-32
pubmed: 15363673
Ann Med. 1999 Apr;31(2):87-98
pubmed: 10344580
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 30;9(1):11032
pubmed: 31363110
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jul;287(1):E174-81
pubmed: 15039146
Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1959 Jul;44:258-63
pubmed: 13838437
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1984 Summer;20(3):566-8
pubmed: 6473663
Sci Adv. 2016 May 06;2(5):e1501705
pubmed: 27386531
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):e0225988
pubmed: 31851723
Nature. 1991 Mar 7;350(6313):18
pubmed: 2002838
Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:630
pubmed: 23212247
Science. 1999 Jun 25;284(5423):2177-81
pubmed: 10381883
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000 Nov;279(5):R1574-9
pubmed: 11049838
Science. 1986 Aug 8;233(4764):667-71
pubmed: 3726555
J Biol Rhythms. 1999 Jun;14(3):237-53
pubmed: 10452336
Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):336-8
pubmed: 25015557