Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
09
2020
accepted:
08
12
2020
entrez:
28
12
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
12
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is one of the most common outpatient urological diagnoses, and its incidence is increasing. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been suggested for relieving local perineal symptoms associated with chronic prostatitis/CPPS. Despite several treatment methods, no causal or standardized treatment is available for CPPS. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of ESWT for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis. Studies were collected using four search engines (Pubmed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOHost), on May 16, 2020; and assessed based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers performed study selection. Studies were then analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 for the meta-analysis. Seventy-four publications were initially retrieved, and three studies were considered for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. From these studies, we found that the use of ESWT was significantly associated with decreased pain domain (mean difference: -3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.13, -2.73; p<0.001), improved urinary score (mean difference: -1.79; 95% CI -2.38, -1.21; p<0.001), improved quality of life (mean difference: -1.71; 95% CI -2.12, -1.31; p<0.001), and improved National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) score (mean difference: -5.45; 95% CI -5.74, -5.16; p<0.001) after 12 weeks of treatment. ESWT is efficacious and safe in reducing pain and improving urinary condition, NIH-CPSI score, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-bacterial prostatitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33370372
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244295
pii: PONE-D-20-28346
pmc: PMC7769278
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0244295Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No authors have competing interests.
Références
J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):551-4
pubmed: 15247727
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan 06;14:12-17
pubmed: 28119778
ISRN Urol. 2013 Aug 28;2013:972601
pubmed: 24000311
J Urol. 1998 Apr;159(4):1224-8
pubmed: 9507840
Prog Urol. 2010 Nov;20(12):940-53
pubmed: 21056369
Drugs. 2009;69(1):71-84
pubmed: 19192937
Urol Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;36(4):527-36, vii
pubmed: 19942050
Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Apr;8(4):207-12
pubmed: 21403661
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 24;6(2):e17242
pubmed: 21390219
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1690-8
pubmed: 17050893
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 14;15:35
pubmed: 25880989
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Mar;9(3):658-666
pubmed: 25667610
JAMA. 1999 Jul 21;282(3):236-7
pubmed: 10422990
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Apr;19(4):293-6
pubmed: 25097599
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Sep 5;133(5):367-81
pubmed: 10979882
Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:195-206
pubmed: 16409145
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):418-24
pubmed: 19372000
BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(8):976-80
pubmed: 18510660
J Psychosom Res. 1996 Oct;41(4):313-25
pubmed: 8971661
Am J Mens Health. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):1557988319865380
pubmed: 31311396