Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis.
COVID-19
South Korea
case study
coronavirus
epidemiology
global health
health systems
non-pharmaceutical interventions
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 12 2020
21 12 2020
Historique:
received:
11
11
2020
revised:
09
12
2020
accepted:
16
12
2020
entrez:
29
12
2020
pubmed:
30
12
2020
medline:
6
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This case study focuses on the epidemiological situation of the COVID-19 outbreak, its impacts and the measures South Korea undertook during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the first case was confirmed on 20 January 2020, South Korea has been actively experiencing the COVID-19 outbreak. In the early stage of the pandemic, South Korea was one of the most-affected countries because of a large outbreak related to meetings of a religious movement, namely the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, in a city called Daegu and North Gyeongsang province. However, South Korea was held as a model for many other countries as it appeared to slow the spread of the outbreak with distinctive approaches and interventions. First of all, with drastic and early intervention strategies it conducted massive tracing and testing in a combination of case isolation. These measures were underpinned by transparent risk communication, civil society mobilization, improvement of accessibility and affordability of the treatment and test, the consistent public message on the potential benefit of wearing a mask, and innovation. Innovative measures include the mobile case-tracing application, mobile self-quarantine safety protection application, mobile self-diagnosis application, and drive-thru screening centres. Meanwhile, the epidemic has brought enormous impacts on society economically and socially. Given its relationship with China, where the outbreak originated, the economic impact in South Korea was predicted to be intense and it was already observed since February due to a decline in exports. The pandemic and measures undertaken by the government also have resulted in social conflicts and debates, human-right concerns, and political tension. Moreover, it was believed that the outbreak of COVID-19 and the governmental responses towards it has brought a huge impact on the general election in April. Despite of the large outbreak in late February, the Korean government has flattened the COVID-19 curve successfully and the downward trend in the number of new cases remained continuously as of 30 April. The most distinctive feature of South Korea's responses is that South Korea conducted proactive case finding, contacts tracing, and isolations of cases instead of taking traditional measures of the containment of the epidemic such as boarder closures and lockdowns.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33371309
pii: ijerph17249571
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249571
pmc: PMC7766828
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23084
pubmed: 21826228
Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020011
pubmed: 32164053
Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020026
pubmed: 32375455
J R Soc Interface. 2005 Sep 22;2(4):281-93
pubmed: 16849186
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2129-2130
pubmed: 32324202
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 May;53(3):175-177
pubmed: 32498141
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Mar;33(2):233-246
pubmed: 29506344
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):664-666
pubmed: 32061311
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):868-882
pubmed: 32329522
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Mar 23;35(11):e123
pubmed: 32193904