Affinity of small-molecule solutes to hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and chemically patterned interfaces in aqueous solution.

inverse design membrane fouling molecular simulation solvation free energy surface adsorption

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 01 2021
Historique:
entrez: 29 12 2020
pubmed: 30 12 2020
medline: 30 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Performance of membranes for water purification is highly influenced by the interactions of solvated species with membrane surfaces, including surface adsorption of solutes upon fouling. Current efforts toward fouling-resistant membranes often pursue surface hydrophilization, frequently motivated by macroscopic measures of hydrophilicity, because hydrophobicity is thought to increase solute-surface affinity. While this heuristic has driven diverse membrane functionalization strategies, here we build on advances in the theory of hydrophobicity to critically examine the relevance of macroscopic characterizations of solute-surface affinity. Specifically, we use molecular simulations to quantify the affinities to model hydroxyl- and methyl-functionalized surfaces of small, chemically diverse, charge-neutral solutes represented in produced water. We show that surface affinities correlate poorly with two conventional measures of solute hydrophobicity, gas-phase water solubility and oil-water partitioning. Moreover, we find that all solutes show attraction to the hydrophobic surface and most to the hydrophilic one, in contrast to macroscopically based hydrophobicity heuristics. We explain these results by decomposing affinities into direct solute interaction energies (which dominate on hydroxyl surfaces) and water restructuring penalties (which dominate on methyl surfaces). Finally, we use an inverse design algorithm to show how heterogeneous surfaces, with multiple functional groups, can be patterned to manipulate solute affinity and selectivity. These findings, importantly based on a range of solute and surface chemistries, illustrate that conventional macroscopic hydrophobicity metrics can fail to predict solute-surface affinity, and that molecular-scale surface chemical patterning significantly influences affinity-suggesting design opportunities for water purification membranes and other engineered interfaces involving aqueous solute-surface interactions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33372161
pii: 2020205118
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020205118
pmc: PMC7821046
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interest.

Références

Nat Nanotechnol. 2010 Sep;5(9):671-5
pubmed: 20711178
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Mar 29;498(2):274-281
pubmed: 28720500
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Apr 17;102(15):156101
pubmed: 19518653
J Chem Phys. 2019 Sep 7;151(9):094501
pubmed: 31492058
J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Dec 13;139(49):17890-17901
pubmed: 29091442
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13345-13350
pubmed: 29158409
Science. 2017 Jun 16;356(6343):
pubmed: 28619885
J Chem Phys. 2014 Dec 14;141(22):22D525
pubmed: 25494796
ACS Nano. 2017 Mar 28;11(3):2586-2597
pubmed: 28267918
Faraday Discuss. 2010;146:353-65; discussion 367-93, 395-401
pubmed: 21043432
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15181-5
pubmed: 19706474
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 19;105(7):2274-9
pubmed: 18268339
Chem Rev. 2010 Apr 14;110(4):2448-71
pubmed: 20095575
J Phys Chem B. 2008 May 22;112(20):6296-300
pubmed: 18442285
Water Res. 2015 Jan 1;68:34-55
pubmed: 25462715
Biomaterials. 2008 Feb;29(5):513-32
pubmed: 17988731
J Phys Chem B. 2014 Feb 13;118(6):1564-73
pubmed: 24397378
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Feb 4;7(4):2385-92
pubmed: 25569191
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Feb 4;114(4):1632-7
pubmed: 20058869
Langmuir. 2009 Nov 17;25(22):13092-9
pubmed: 19492828
Langmuir. 2013 Jun 25;29(25):7999-8009
pubmed: 23706011
Langmuir. 2007 Jul 31;23(16):8508-14
pubmed: 17622160
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Jul 17;103(3):037803
pubmed: 19659321
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 16;104(3):808-13
pubmed: 17204562
J Phys Chem B. 2012 Mar 1;116(8):2498-503
pubmed: 22235927
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Aug 20;6(9):2924-2934
pubmed: 21135914
J Chem Phys. 2004 May 22;120(20):9665-78
pubmed: 15267980
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Aug 11;11(8):3696-713
pubmed: 26574453
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2012;63:179-200
pubmed: 22475337
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:147-71
pubmed: 22432614
Langmuir. 2015 Jan 13;31(1):628-36
pubmed: 25470315
Langmuir. 2010 May 18;26(10):7396-404
pubmed: 20222735
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Feb 24;109(7):2934-41
pubmed: 16851306
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 14;111(41):14681-6
pubmed: 25258413
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jun 3;114(21):7294-301
pubmed: 20443643
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 25;108(43):17678-83
pubmed: 21987795
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Feb 11;114(5):1954-8
pubmed: 20055377
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15119-24
pubmed: 19706896
J Comput Chem. 2002 Dec;23(16):1623-41
pubmed: 12395429
J Phys Condens Matter. 2016 Oct 19;28(41):414013
pubmed: 27545849
J Phys Chem B. 2018 Dec 13;122(49):11695-11701
pubmed: 30252476
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Feb 10;53(7):1746-54
pubmed: 24446141
Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):712-7
pubmed: 21817042
J Chem Theory Comput. 2019 Feb 12;15(2):1302-1316
pubmed: 30592594
Faraday Discuss. 2010;146:247-62; discussion 283-98, 395-401
pubmed: 21043426
Faraday Discuss. 2016 Oct 6;191:435-464
pubmed: 27453564
J Chem Phys. 2007 Nov 7;127(17):174103
pubmed: 17994803
Nature. 1998 Apr 16;392(6677):696-9
pubmed: 9565030
Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1605-9
pubmed: 15361621
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 16;127(10):3556-67
pubmed: 15755177
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jul 26;13(7):e1005659
pubmed: 28746339
J Phys Chem B. 2006 Apr 27;110(16):8459-63
pubmed: 16623532
ACS Nano. 2015 Dec 22;9(12):11761-74
pubmed: 26506132
J Chem Phys. 2007 Aug 7;127(5):054505
pubmed: 17688347
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2016 May 27;67:617-38
pubmed: 27215821
Langmuir. 2013 Mar 5;29(9):2919-26
pubmed: 23394469
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):8951-5
pubmed: 11607700
Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):640-7
pubmed: 16193038
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 7;115(32):8093-8098
pubmed: 30038028
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):265
pubmed: 30670792
J Phys Chem B. 2009 Oct 22;113(42):13723-34
pubmed: 19435300
Langmuir. 2015 Nov 10;31(44):12223-30
pubmed: 26484800
Chem Rev. 2006 Apr;106(4):1259-81
pubmed: 16608180
J Chem Phys. 2008 Sep 28;129(12):124105
pubmed: 19045004
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 25;108(4):1326-30
pubmed: 21205906
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Aug 2;111(30):9069-77
pubmed: 17608515
Water Res. 2012 Mar 1;46(3):584-600
pubmed: 22154112
J Phys Condens Matter. 2016 Mar 2;28(8):083003
pubmed: 26836518
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Apr 18;56(17):4662-4711
pubmed: 27604844
Langmuir. 2016 Sep 6;32(35):8767-82
pubmed: 27487420
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4332-7
pubmed: 27036002

Auteurs

Jacob I Monroe (JI)

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.

Sally Jiao (S)

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.

R Justin Davis (RJ)

Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.

Dennis Robinson Brown (D)

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.

Lynn E Katz (LE)

Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.

M Scott Shell (MS)

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; shell@engineering.ucsb.edu.

Classifications MeSH