A Minimally Invasive Technique for Short Spiral Implant Insertion with Contextual Crestal Sinus Lifting in the Atrophic Maxilla: A Preliminary Report.
atrophic posterior maxilla
maxillary crestal sinus lifting
maxillary sinus
short dental implant
spiral implant
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Dec 2020
24 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
06
12
2020
revised:
17
12
2020
accepted:
22
12
2020
entrez:
30
12
2020
pubmed:
31
12
2020
medline:
31
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The most recently reported techniques for the rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla are increasingly less invasive, as they are generally oriented to avoid sinus floor elevation with lateral access. The authors describe a mini-invasive surgical technique for short spiral implant insertion for the prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla, which could be considered a combination of several previously described techniques based on the under-preparation of the implant site to improve fixture primary stability and crestal approach to the sinus floor elevation without heterologous bone graft. Eighty short spiral implants were inserted in the molar area of the maxilla in patients with 4.5-6 mm of alveolar bone, measured on pre-operative computed tomography. The surgical technique involved careful drilling for the preparation of implant sites at differentiated depths, allowing bone dislocation in the apical direction, traumatic crestal sinus membrane elevation, and insertion of an implant (with spiral morphology) longer than pre-operative measurements. Prostheses were all single crowns. In all cases, a spiral implant 2-4 mm longer than the residual bone was placed. Only two implants were lost due to peri-implantitis but subsequently replaced and followed-up. Bone loss values around the implants after three months (at the re-opening) ranged from 0 to 0.6 mm, (median value: 0.1 mm), while after two years, the same values ranged from 0.4 to 1.3 mm (median value: 0.7 mm). Clinical post-operative complications did not occur. After ten years, no implant has been lost. Overall, the described protocol seems to show good results in terms of predictability and patient compliance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33374157
pii: healthcare9010011
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010011
pmc: PMC7823647
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Mar 19;40(5):757–764
pubmed: 32191779
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;47(9):1195-1198
pubmed: 29653870
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2018;28(3):209-214
pubmed: 30806279
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:67-72
pubmed: 19663952
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):161-166
pubmed: 27389435
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1156-63
pubmed: 27632273
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e029826
pubmed: 31662363
Head Face Med. 2006 Jun 22;2:18
pubmed: 16792797
J Periodontol. 2004 Apr;75(4):511-6
pubmed: 15152813
Implant Dent. 2019 Dec;28(6):590-602
pubmed: 31274666
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;50(2):251-257
pubmed: 32600745
Materials (Basel). 2019 Aug 11;12(16):
pubmed: 31405201
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 20;17(12):
pubmed: 32575702
Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):130-141
pubmed: 28337422
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jan 22;5(1):3
pubmed: 30666468
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):877-886
pubmed: 27296955
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):207-215
pubmed: 27295262
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):413-20
pubmed: 15214227
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 May 01;21(3):e392-402
pubmed: 26946199
Aust Dent J. 2019 Dec;64(4):353-358
pubmed: 31356692
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Jul 14;:
pubmed: 32663265
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):220-224
pubmed: 31508355