Amniotic Fluid Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Counteract Steroid-Induced Osteoporosis In Vitro.
Amniotic Fluid
/ cytology
Blotting, Western
Cell Differentiation
/ drug effects
Cell Line
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Cells, Cultured
Dexamethasone
/ pharmacology
Extracellular Vesicles
/ metabolism
Female
Glutathione
/ metabolism
Humans
Osteoblasts
/ cytology
Osteoporosis
/ chemically induced
Pregnancy
Reactive Oxygen Species
/ metabolism
Stem Cells
/ metabolism
Steroids
AFSC
extracellular vesicles
osteoporosis
oxidative stress
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Dec 2020
22 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
revised:
18
12
2020
accepted:
19
12
2020
entrez:
30
12
2020
pubmed:
31
12
2020
medline:
30
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background-Osteoporosis is characterized by defects in both quality and quantity of bone tissue, which imply high susceptibility to fractures with limitations of autonomy. Current therapies for osteoporosis are mostly concentrated on how to inhibit bone resorption but give serious adverse effects. Therefore, more effective and safer therapies are needed that even encourage bone formation. Here we examined the effect of extracellular vesicles secreted by human amniotic fluid stem cells (AFSC) (AFSC-EV) on a model of osteoporosis in vitro. Methods-human AFSC-EV were added to the culture medium of a human pre-osteoblast cell line (HOB) induced to differentiate, and then treated with dexamethasone as osteoporosis inducer. Aspects of differentiation and viability were assessed by immunofluorescence, Western blot, mass spectrometry, and histological assays. Since steroids induce oxidative stress, the levels of reactive oxygen species and of redox related proteins were evaluated. Results-AFSC-EV were able to ameliorate the differentiation ability of HOB both in the case of pre-osteoblasts and when the differentiation process was affected by dexamethasone. Moreover, the viability was increased and parallelly apoptotic markers were reduced. The presence of EV positively modulated the redox unbalance due to dexamethasone. Conclusion-these findings demonstrated that EV from hAFSC have the ability to recover precursor cell potential and delay local bone loss in steroid-related osteoporosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33375177
pii: ijms22010038
doi: 10.3390/ijms22010038
pmc: PMC7792960
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Reactive Oxygen Species
0
Steroids
0
Dexamethasone
7S5I7G3JQL
Glutathione
GAN16C9B8O
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):479-90
pubmed: 15040837
Chem Biol Interact. 2016 Aug 25;256:188-97
pubmed: 27387537
Science. 2004 Mar 26;303(5666):2011-5
pubmed: 14976264
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Nov 18;2018:4125297
pubmed: 30581529
Genes Dev. 2013 May 1;27(9):971-4
pubmed: 23651851
Mol Cell. 2015 Feb 5;57(3):456-66
pubmed: 25601754
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2001 Jun;1(4):327-32
pubmed: 15758483
Biofactors. 2020 Jan;46(1):106-117
pubmed: 31625201
Mech Ageing Dev. 2020 Oct;191:111328
pubmed: 32800796
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Dec 17;2018:5263985
pubmed: 30647811
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jun;22(12):3962-3970
pubmed: 29949171
Gene Expr. 1999;7(4-6):377-85
pubmed: 10440238
Metabolism. 2019 Jun;95:93-101
pubmed: 30668962
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019 Jan 1;508(1):138-144
pubmed: 30473217
Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Feb;110:602-608
pubmed: 30537677
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Jan 5;399:178-89
pubmed: 25192797
Cytotherapy. 2017 Aug;19(8):1002-1012
pubmed: 28571656
Mater Today Bio. 2020 Jun 27;7:100067
pubmed: 32695985
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020 Jul 17;11(1):296
pubmed: 32680564
J Mol Neurosci. 2018 Feb;64(2):162-174
pubmed: 29260451
J Biol Chem. 2018 Feb 9;293(6):1957-1975
pubmed: 29284679
Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2002 May;25(5):164-7
pubmed: 12050922
Circ Res. 2007 Jan 5;100(1):50-60
pubmed: 17158337
Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Oct 24;10(10):2911-2934
pubmed: 30362963
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D328-D334
pubmed: 31724716
Mol Cell. 2009 Jun 26;34(6):663-73
pubmed: 19560419
Mol Med Rep. 2018 Mar;17(3):4307-4316
pubmed: 29363725
Neurotoxicology. 2019 Dec;75:209-220
pubmed: 31585128
Hum Genomics. 2019 Dec 5;13(1):63
pubmed: 31806011
J Cell Biochem. 2008 Mar 1;103(4):1037-45
pubmed: 18240141
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;13(5):362-368
pubmed: 29623851
Biofactors. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):25-32
pubmed: 20087883
Ageing Res Rev. 2020 Sep;62:101098
pubmed: 32535273
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005 Oct;4(10):1487-502
pubmed: 15979981
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):1357-1366
pubmed: 30977425
J Cell Sci. 2006 Dec 15;119(Pt 24):5015-20
pubmed: 17158908
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Jul 22;8:619
pubmed: 32793590
Bone. 2019 Apr;121:284-292
pubmed: 30738214
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Dec;21(24):5548-5556
pubmed: 29271985
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 5;9(1):18424
pubmed: 31804494
Mol Cell Biochem. 2004 Nov;266(1-2):17-24
pubmed: 15646023
Ageing Res Rev. 2015 Nov;24(Pt B):206-17
pubmed: 26318060
J Clin Invest. 2005 Dec;115(12):3318-25
pubmed: 16322775
Front Biosci. 2007 May 01;12:3068-92
pubmed: 17485283
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1156:213-22
pubmed: 24791991
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 21;18(11):
pubmed: 29160796
Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):560-4
pubmed: 11932750
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 16;5:9148
pubmed: 25779629
Cytokine. 2018 Dec;112:102-115
pubmed: 29914791
Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jun;26(12):4746-57
pubmed: 16738336
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 19;16:502
pubmed: 27435226
Cell Death Differ. 2015 Dec;22(12):2123-32
pubmed: 26045045
Biofactors. 2018 Mar;44(2):158-167
pubmed: 29341292
J Biol Chem. 2003 May 30;278(22):19579-82
pubmed: 12697768
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Oct 24;2020:2785343
pubmed: 33193997
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 11;6:134
pubmed: 30364287
Int J Biol Sci. 2016 May 25;12(7):836-49
pubmed: 27313497
J Cell Biochem. 2000 Sep 14;79(4):557-65
pubmed: 10996846