Clinical Practice Guidelines on Ordering Echocardiography Before Hip Fracture Repair Perform Differently from One Another.

clinical practice guidelines echocardiogram peri-operative management pre-operative clearance

Journal

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
ISSN: 1556-3316
Titre abrégé: HSS J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101273938

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 13 12 2019
accepted: 26 03 2020
entrez: 30 12 2020
pubmed: 31 12 2020
medline: 31 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Osteoporotic hip fractures typically occur in frail elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, and repair of the fracture within 48 h is recommended. Pre-operative evaluation sometimes involves transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to screen for heart disease that would alter peri-operative management, yet TTE can delay surgery and is resource intensive. Evidence suggests that the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can improve care. It is unclear which guidelines are most useful in hip fracture patients. We sought to evaluate the performance of the five commonly used CPGs in determining which patients with acute fragility hip fracture require TTE and to identify common features among high-performing CPGs that could be incorporated into care pathways. We performed a retrospective study of medical records taken from an institutional database of osteoporotic hip fracture patients to identify those who underwent pre-operative TTE. History and physical examination findings were recorded; listed indications for TTE were compared against those given in five commonly used CPGs: those from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), the British Society of Echocardiography (BSE), the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Anaesthesiology(ESC/ESA), the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI), and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). We then calculated the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the CPGs in identifying patients with TTE results that had the potential to change peri-operative management. We identified 100 patients who underwent pre-operative TTE. Among those, the patients met criteria for TTE 32 to 66% of the time, depending on the CPG used. In 14% of those receiving TTE, the test revealed new information with the potential to change management. The sensitivity of the CPGs ranged from 71% (ESC/ESA and AAGBI) to 100% (ACC/AHA and SIGN). The CPGs' specificity ranged from 37% (BSE) to 74% (ESC/ESA). The more sensitive guidelines focused on a change in clinical status in patients with known disease or clinical concern regarding new-onset disease. In patients requiring fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures, TTE can be useful for identifying pathologies that could directly change peri-operative management. Our data suggest that established CPGs can be safely used to identify which patients should undergo pre-operative TTE with low risk of missed pathology.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Osteoporotic hip fractures typically occur in frail elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, and repair of the fracture within 48 h is recommended. Pre-operative evaluation sometimes involves transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to screen for heart disease that would alter peri-operative management, yet TTE can delay surgery and is resource intensive. Evidence suggests that the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can improve care. It is unclear which guidelines are most useful in hip fracture patients.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES OBJECTIVE
We sought to evaluate the performance of the five commonly used CPGs in determining which patients with acute fragility hip fracture require TTE and to identify common features among high-performing CPGs that could be incorporated into care pathways.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
We performed a retrospective study of medical records taken from an institutional database of osteoporotic hip fracture patients to identify those who underwent pre-operative TTE. History and physical examination findings were recorded; listed indications for TTE were compared against those given in five commonly used CPGs: those from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), the British Society of Echocardiography (BSE), the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Anaesthesiology(ESC/ESA), the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI), and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). We then calculated the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the CPGs in identifying patients with TTE results that had the potential to change peri-operative management.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 100 patients who underwent pre-operative TTE. Among those, the patients met criteria for TTE 32 to 66% of the time, depending on the CPG used. In 14% of those receiving TTE, the test revealed new information with the potential to change management. The sensitivity of the CPGs ranged from 71% (ESC/ESA and AAGBI) to 100% (ACC/AHA and SIGN). The CPGs' specificity ranged from 37% (BSE) to 74% (ESC/ESA). The more sensitive guidelines focused on a change in clinical status in patients with known disease or clinical concern regarding new-onset disease.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In patients requiring fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures, TTE can be useful for identifying pathologies that could directly change peri-operative management. Our data suggest that established CPGs can be safely used to identify which patients should undergo pre-operative TTE with low risk of missed pathology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33376460
doi: 10.1007/s11420-020-09762-8
pii: 9762
pmc: PMC7749896
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

378-382

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of InterestChris Adair, MD, Rachel B. Seymour, PhD, and Madhav A. Karunakar, MD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Eric Swart, MD, reports receiving royalties from Springer, outside the submitted work.

Références

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Mar;24(3):229-67
pubmed: 21338862
Echocardiography. 2014 Sep;31(8):916-23
pubmed: 24447139
Can J Anaesth. 2008 Mar;55(3):146-54
pubmed: 18310624
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):222-33
pubmed: 26260393
JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1573-9
pubmed: 19826027
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):239-42
pubmed: 26630466
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Oct;31(10):517-73
pubmed: 25127426
Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;57(4):408-10
pubmed: 24163461
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Apr 19;99(8):676-680
pubmed: 28419035
N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 6;334(23):1519-25
pubmed: 8618608
J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75
pubmed: 17144789
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):e77-137
pubmed: 25091544
Injury. 2012 Dec;43(12):2146-51
pubmed: 22995981
Ochsner J. 2012 Summer;12(2):101-10
pubmed: 22778674
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):57-62
pubmed: 26405095
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Sep;3(3):129-34
pubmed: 23569706
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jul;67(7):714-20
pubmed: 22452367
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Feb;23(2):138-40
pubmed: 25624366
CMAJ. 2010 Oct 19;182(15):1609-16
pubmed: 20837683
Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):764-76
pubmed: 24773366
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(1):49-54
pubmed: 25881693
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175
pubmed: 23056256
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20;93(14):1326-34
pubmed: 21792499
Echo Res Pract. 2018 Sep;5(3):G11-G24
pubmed: 30012832
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Aug 1;100(15):1343-1350
pubmed: 30063599

Auteurs

Eric Swart (E)

Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA USA.

Chris Adair (C)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 1025 Morehead Medical Plaza, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA.

Rachel B Seymour (RB)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 1025 Morehead Medical Plaza, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA.

Madhav A Karunakar (MA)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 1025 Morehead Medical Plaza, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA.

Classifications MeSH