What is the role of cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty? The two-year results of a randomized RSA controlled trial.


Journal

The bone & joint journal
ISSN: 2049-4408
Titre abrégé: Bone Joint J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101599229

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez: 31 12 2020
pubmed: 1 1 2021
medline: 21 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

For many designs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) it remains unclear whether cemented or uncemented fixation provides optimal long-term survival. The main limitation in most studies is a retrospective or non-comparative study design. The same is true for comparative trials looking only at the survival rate as extensive sample sizes are needed to detect true differences in fixation and durability. Studies using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) techniques have shown to be highly predictive in detecting late occurring aseptic loosening at an early stage. To investigate the difference in predicted long-term survival between cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of TKA, we performed a randomized controlled trial using RSA. A total of 105 patients were randomized into three groups (cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing (ACS MB) knee system, implantcast). RSA examinations were performed on the first day after surgery and at scheduled follow-up visits at three months, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after two years follow-up. Patients and follow-up investigators were blinded for the result of randomization. RSA secondary stabilization did not show a significant difference between the three types of fixation. A maximum total point motion of less than 0.2 mm in the second postoperative year was shown in each group, which suggests stabilization of the implant. At 24 months after surgery, PROMs significantly improved compared to baseline in all treatment groups. No significant difference was observed between the three groups. Secondary stabilization measurements in this study demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In all groups migration stabilized after initial settling of the implant. For this implant the long-term outcome is not expected to be influenced by the type of fixation to the bone. Cite this article:

Identifiants

pubmed: 33380179
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0788.R1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bone Cements 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

98-104

Auteurs

Bas van Ooij (B)

SCORE Foundation, Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education/Xpert Clinics Orthopedie, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cohesie, Occupational Health Service, Voorthuizen, The Netherlands.

Inger N Sierevelt (IN)

SCORE Foundation, Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education/Xpert Clinics Orthopedie, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Orthopaedic Department, Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.

Harm M van der Vis (HM)

SCORE Foundation, Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education/Xpert Clinics Orthopedie, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Daniël Hoornenborg (D)

SCORE Foundation, Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education/Xpert Clinics Orthopedie, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Daniël Haverkamp (D)

SCORE Foundation, Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education/Xpert Clinics Orthopedie, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH