Potential overdiagnosis of long QT syndrome using exercise stress and QT stand testing in children and adolescents with a low probability of disease.
KCNH2
KCNQ1
QT-stand test
exercise stress test
long QT syndrome
syncope
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
24
05
2020
revised:
07
12
2020
accepted:
22
12
2020
pubmed:
1
1
2021
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
31
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a dangerous arrhythmia disorder that often presents in childhood and adolescence. The exercise stress test (EST) and QT-stand test may unmask QT interval prolongation at key heart rate transition points in LQTS, but their utility in children is debated. To determine if the QT-stand test or EST can differentiate children with a low probability of LQTS from those with confirmed LQTS. This retrospective study compares the corrected QT intervals (QTc) of children (<19 years) during the QT-stand test and EST. Patients were divided into three groups for comparison: confirmed LQTS (n = 14), low probability of LQTS (n = 14), and a control population (n = 9). Using the Bazett formula, confirmed LQTS patients had longer QTc intervals than controls when supine, standing, and at 3-4 min of recovery (p ≤ .01). Patients with a low probability of LQTS had longer QTc duration upon standing (p = .018) and at 1 min of recovery (p = .016) versus controls. There were no significant QTc differences at any transition point between low probability and confirmed LQTS. Using the Fridericia formula, differences in QTc between low probability and confirmed LQTS were also absent at the transition points examined, except at 1 min into exercise, where low probability patients had shorter QTc intervals (437 vs. 460 ms, p = .029). The diagnostic utility of the QT stand test and EST remains unclear in pediatric LQTS. The formula used for heart rate correction may influence accuracy, and dynamic T-U wave morphology changes may confound interpretation in low probability situations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a dangerous arrhythmia disorder that often presents in childhood and adolescence. The exercise stress test (EST) and QT-stand test may unmask QT interval prolongation at key heart rate transition points in LQTS, but their utility in children is debated.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if the QT-stand test or EST can differentiate children with a low probability of LQTS from those with confirmed LQTS.
METHODS
This retrospective study compares the corrected QT intervals (QTc) of children (<19 years) during the QT-stand test and EST. Patients were divided into three groups for comparison: confirmed LQTS (n = 14), low probability of LQTS (n = 14), and a control population (n = 9).
RESULTS
Using the Bazett formula, confirmed LQTS patients had longer QTc intervals than controls when supine, standing, and at 3-4 min of recovery (p ≤ .01). Patients with a low probability of LQTS had longer QTc duration upon standing (p = .018) and at 1 min of recovery (p = .016) versus controls. There were no significant QTc differences at any transition point between low probability and confirmed LQTS. Using the Fridericia formula, differences in QTc between low probability and confirmed LQTS were also absent at the transition points examined, except at 1 min into exercise, where low probability patients had shorter QTc intervals (437 vs. 460 ms, p = .029).
CONCLUSION
The diagnostic utility of the QT stand test and EST remains unclear in pediatric LQTS. The formula used for heart rate correction may influence accuracy, and dynamic T-U wave morphology changes may confound interpretation in low probability situations.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
500-506Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Priori SG. HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(12):1932-1963.
Mazzanti A, Maragna R, Vacanti G, et al. Interplay between genetic substrate, QTc duration, and arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(15):1663-1671.
Wong JA, Gula LJ, Klein GJ, Yee R, Skanes AC, Krahn AD. Utility of treadmill testing in identification and genotype prediction in long-QT syndrome. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(2):120-125.
Adler A, van der Werf C, Postema PG, et al. The phenomenon of “QT stunning”: the abnormal QT prolongation provoked by standing persists even as the heart rate returns to normal in patients with long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(6):901-908.
Viskin S, Postema PG, Bhuiyan ZA, et al. The response of the QT interval to the brief tachycardia provoked by standing: a bedside test for diagnosing long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(18):1955-1961.
Sy RW, van der Werf C, Chattha IS, et al. Derivation and validation of a simple exercise-based algorithm for prediction of genetic testing in relatives of LQTS probands. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2187-2194.
Kligfield P, Lax KG, Okin PM. QT interval-heart rate relation during exercise in normal men and women: definition by linear regression analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(6):1547-1555.
Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. QTc behavior during exercise and genetic testing for the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2181-2184.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-424.
Duff DK, De Souza AM, Human DG, Potts JE, Harris KC. A novel treadmill protocol for exercise testing in children: the British Columbia Children's Hospital protocol. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;3(1):e000197.
Postema PG, De Jong JS, Van der Bilt IA, Wilde AA. Accurate electrocardiographic assessment of the QT interval: teach the tangent. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(7):1015-1018.
Rohatgi RK, Sugrue A, Bos JM, et al. Contemporary outcomes in patients with long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(4):453-462.
Sy RW, Gollob MH, Klein GJ, et al. Arrhythmia characterization and long-term outcomes in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(6):864-871.
Filippini LHPM, Postema PG, Zoubin K, et al. The brisk-standing-test for long QT syndrome in prepubertal school children: defining normal. Europace. 2018;20(Fi1):f108-f112.
Dionne A, Fournier A, Dahdah N, Abrams D, Khairy P, Abadir S. Dynamic QT interval changes from supine to standing in healthy children. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(1):66-72.
Berger WR, Gow RM, Kamberi S, Cheung M, Smith KR, Davis AM. The QT and corrected QT interval in recovery after exercise in children. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(4):448-455.
Viskin S, Rosovski U, Sands AJ, et al. Inaccurate electrocardiographic interpretation of long QT: the majority of physicians cannot recognize a long QT when they see one. Heart Rhythm: Off J Heart Rhythm Soc. 2005;2(6):569-574.
Aziz PF, Wieand TS, Ganley J, et al. Genotype- and mutation site-specific QT adaptation during exercise, recovery, and postural changes in children with long-QT syndrome. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(6):867-873.
Horner JM, Horner MM, Ackerman MJ. The diagnostic utility of recovery phase QTc during treadmill exercise stress testing in the evaluation of long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(11):1698-1704.
Hofman N, Wilde AAM, Kaab S, et al. Diagnostic criteria for congenital long QT syndrome in the era of molecular genetics: do we need a scoring system? Eur Heart J. 2007;28(5):575-580.
Vincent GM, Jaiswal D, Timothy KW. Effects of exercise on heart rate, QT, QTc and QT/QS2 in the Romano-Ward inherited long QT syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(5):498-503.
Adler A, Novelli V, Amin AS, et al. An international, multicentered, evidence-based reappraisal of genes reported to cause congenital long QT syndrome. Circulation. 2020;141(6):418-428.