Are the new mobile wireless EEG headsets reliable for the evaluation of musical pleasure?
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
15
09
2020
accepted:
16
12
2020
entrez:
31
12
2020
pubmed:
1
1
2021
medline:
23
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since the beginning of the 20th century, electroencephalography (EEG) has been used in a wide variety of applications, both for medical needs and for the study of various cerebral processes. With the rapid development of the technique, more and more precise and advanced tools have emerged for research purposes. However, the main constraints of these devices have often been the high price and, for some devices the low transportability and the long set-up time. Nevertheless, a broad range of wireless EEG devices have emerged on the market without these constraints, but with a lower signal quality. The development of EEG recording on multiple participants simultaneously, and new technological solutions provides further possibilities to understand the cerebral emotional dynamics of a group. A great number of studies have compared and tested many mobile devices, but have provided contradictory results. It is therefore important to test the reliability of specific wireless devices in a specific research context before developing a large-scale study. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of two wireless devices (g.tech Nautilus SAHARA electrodes and Emotiv™ Epoc +) for the detection of musical emotions, in comparison with a gold standard EEG device. Sixteen participants reported feeling emotional pleasure (from low pleasure up to musical chills) when listening to their favorite chill-inducing musical excerpts. In terms of emotion detection, our results show statistically significant concordance between Epoc + and the gold standard device in the left prefrontal and left temporal areas in the alpha frequency band. We validated the use of the Emotiv™ Epoc + for research into musical emotion. We did not find any significant concordance between g.tech and the gold standard. This suggests that Emotiv Epoc is more appropriate for musical emotion investigations in natural settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33382801
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244820
pii: PONE-D-20-29024
pmc: PMC7775075
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.12936800.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0244820Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Acta Med Croatica. 2005;59(4):307-13
pubmed: 16334737
Psychophysiology. 2007 Mar;44(2):293-304
pubmed: 17343712
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 20;:1-42
pubmed: 32814608
Curr Biol. 2017 May 8;27(9):1375-1380
pubmed: 28457867
J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Oct 1;290:105-115
pubmed: 28760486
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:813870
pubmed: 21253358
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5496196
pubmed: 29349078
Neuroreport. 2010 Apr 21;21(6):410-5
pubmed: 20300041
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 21;4:e1760
pubmed: 27019776
Front Physiol. 2018 Feb 14;9:98
pubmed: 29491841
J Integr Neurosci. 2016 Jun;15(2):205-21
pubmed: 27345028
Physiol Meas. 2015 Jul;36(7):1469-84
pubmed: 26020164
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 13;12:477
pubmed: 30061811
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0174949
pubmed: 28414729
Cortex. 2011 Oct;47(9):1082-90
pubmed: 21664610
PeerJ. 2015 Apr 21;3:e907
pubmed: 25922794
Front Neurosci. 2015 Oct 02;9:354
pubmed: 26483628
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Mar;31(3):327-338
pubmed: 29916793
Psychophysiology. 2012 Nov;49(11):1617-21
pubmed: 23013047
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 30;5:1096
pubmed: 25324805
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 04;7:234
pubmed: 23761745
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 05;9(2):e86733
pubmed: 24505263
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):105-16
pubmed: 22186679
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Mar 17;10:22
pubmed: 19292892
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12166
pubmed: 20808907
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Nov 10;11:527
pubmed: 29176943
PLoS One. 2009 Oct 16;4(10):e7487
pubmed: 19834599
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:8123-6
pubmed: 26738179
Neuroimage. 2020 May 15;212:116665
pubmed: 32087373
Brain Res. 2019 May 15;1711:7-15
pubmed: 30629944
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 03;7(9):e14474
pubmed: 31482852
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:4957-60
pubmed: 18003119
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 02;9:254
pubmed: 29551984
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 04;8:2044
pubmed: 29255434
Brain Sci. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):
pubmed: 28753986
Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 17;24(6):699-704
pubmed: 24613311
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:3666-9
pubmed: 17945788
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 29;6:312
pubmed: 23226120
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Mar 19;19(6):
pubmed: 30893791
Biomed Eng Online. 2013 Jun 25;12:56
pubmed: 23800158
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e73852
pubmed: 24040094
Int J Psychophysiol. 2004 Aug;53(3):239-43
pubmed: 15246677
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 30;11:150
pubmed: 28424600
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Mar;31(3):401-411
pubmed: 29708820
Front Neurosci. 2020 Nov 03;14:565815
pubmed: 33224021
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Apr;36:100635
pubmed: 30877927
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24893
pubmed: 21957466
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 17;10:2954
pubmed: 32010021
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):552-69
pubmed: 20132861
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Mar 15;:
pubmed: 29543978
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov;25(11):4038-47
pubmed: 24904066