The impact of posttraumatic stress disorder on event-related potentials in affective and non-affective paradigms: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

ERP Event related potential Meta-analysis PTSD Post-traumatic stress disorder

Journal

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
ISSN: 1873-7528
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806090

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 12 05 2020
revised: 09 11 2020
accepted: 20 12 2020
pubmed: 1 1 2021
medline: 28 5 2021
entrez: 31 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with neural processing deficits affecting early automatic and later conscious processing. Event-related Potentials (ERPs) are high resolution indices of automatic and conscious processing, but there are no meta-analyses that have examined automatic and conscious ERPs in PTSD across multiple paradigms. This systematic review examined 69 studies across affective and non-affective auditory and visual paradigms. Individuals with PTSD were compared to trauma-exposed and non-trauma controls on ERPs reflecting automatic (N1, P1, N2, P2) and conscious (P3, LPP) processing. Trauma exposure was associated with increased automatic ERP amplitudes to irrelevant auditory information. PTSD further showed increased automatic and conscious allocation of resources to affective information, reduced automatic attending and classification as well as reduced attention processing and working memory updating of non-affective information. Therefore, trauma exposure is associated with enhanced early processing of incoming stimuli, and PTSD with enhanced processing of affective stimuli and impaired processing of non-affective stimuli. This review highlights the need for longitudinal ERP studies in PTSD, adopting standardized procedures and methodological designs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33383070
pii: S0149-7634(20)30702-8
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.027
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

120-142

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lisa N Miller (LN)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: lisam3@student.unimelb.edu.au.

Julian G Simmons (JG)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Sarah Whittle (S)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia.

David Forbes (D)

Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Phoenix Australia, Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Kim Felmingham (K)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH