Evaluation of patients suffered from burning mouth syndrome and persistent idiopathic facial pain using Japanese version PainDETECT questionnaire and depression scales.
Beck's depression inventory
Burning mouth syndrome
Hamilton depression rating scale
PainDETECT
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
Journal
Journal of dental sciences
ISSN: 2213-8862
Titre abrégé: J Dent Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101293181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
revised:
05
06
2020
entrez:
1
1
2021
pubmed:
2
1
2021
medline:
2
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Various questionnaires have been validated as methods for screening of neuropathic pain, but none have been established for the orofacial region. Although chronic pain and depression are likely to comorbid, few studies have examined the relationship between orofacial chronic pain and depression. Therefore, we evaluated the potential of the Japanese Version of PainDETECT as an assessment tool for neuropathic pain associated with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). We also evaluated the depression scale such as Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI: a subjective index) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS: an objective index) with BMS or PIFP. As a target, we administered the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire to the BMS (29 patients) and PIFP (17 patients). As a control, patients with post-extraction pain (typical nociceptive pain, (EXT) 16 patients) were also participated. We performed BDI and HDRS with BMS or PIFP. Although PainDETECT final score was significantly higher in BMS [median: 10] compared with PIFP [6] and EXT [5] (p < 0.05), PainDETECT final scores for all groups were lower than the cutoff value for the possibility of neuropathic pain. HDRS was significantly higher in the BMS than the PIFP. There were no significant differences between the BMS and PIFP in BDI. Under the limitations of current research design, the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire does not show sufficient potential as pain assessment tool for patients with BMS and PIFP. BMS is comorbid with depression objectively when compared with PIFP.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
Various questionnaires have been validated as methods for screening of neuropathic pain, but none have been established for the orofacial region. Although chronic pain and depression are likely to comorbid, few studies have examined the relationship between orofacial chronic pain and depression. Therefore, we evaluated the potential of the Japanese Version of PainDETECT as an assessment tool for neuropathic pain associated with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). We also evaluated the depression scale such as Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI: a subjective index) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS: an objective index) with BMS or PIFP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
As a target, we administered the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire to the BMS (29 patients) and PIFP (17 patients). As a control, patients with post-extraction pain (typical nociceptive pain, (EXT) 16 patients) were also participated. We performed BDI and HDRS with BMS or PIFP.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Although PainDETECT final score was significantly higher in BMS [median: 10] compared with PIFP [6] and EXT [5] (p < 0.05), PainDETECT final scores for all groups were lower than the cutoff value for the possibility of neuropathic pain. HDRS was significantly higher in the BMS than the PIFP. There were no significant differences between the BMS and PIFP in BDI.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Under the limitations of current research design, the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire does not show sufficient potential as pain assessment tool for patients with BMS and PIFP. BMS is comorbid with depression objectively when compared with PIFP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33384789
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.008
pii: S1991-7902(20)30130-6
pmc: PMC7770319
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
131-136Informations de copyright
© 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Références
Clin J Pain. 2003 Sep-Oct;19(5):306-14
pubmed: 12966256
Pain Med. 2017 Aug 01;18(8):1528-1533
pubmed: 28057813
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e68013
pubmed: 24098629
Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2226-35
pubmed: 21704872
Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):199-203
pubmed: 17182186
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015 Jul-Aug;38(4):158-61
pubmed: 26166242
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):147-57
pubmed: 11323136
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211
pubmed: 29368949
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
pubmed: 13688369
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Jun;17(6):336
pubmed: 23645183
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015 Spring;29(2):177-82
pubmed: 25905536
J Pain. 2005 Mar;6(3):149-58
pubmed: 15772908
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Oct;22(10):1911-20
pubmed: 17022849