Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic cancers: a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 04 06 2020
revised: 28 08 2020
accepted: 01 09 2020
pubmed: 3 1 2021
medline: 27 1 2021
entrez: 2 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly being used to treat oligometastatic cancers, but high-level evidence to provide a basis for policy making is scarce. Additional evidence from a real-world setting is required. We present the results of a national study of patients with extracranial oligometastases undergoing SABR, representing the largest dataset, to our knowledge, on outcomes in this population so far. In 2015, National Health Service (NHS) England launched a Commissioning through Evaluation scheme that funded a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study of patients with solid cancer and extracranial oligometastases treated with SABR. Prescribed doses ranged from 24-60 Gy administered in three to eight fractions. The study was done at 17 NHS radiotherapy centres in England. Patients were eligible for the scheme if aged 18 years or older with confirmed primary carcinoma (excluding haematological malignancies), one to three extracranial metastatic lesions, a disease-free interval from primary tumour development to metastases of longer than 6 months (with the exception of synchronous colorectal liver metastases), a WHO performance status of 2 or lower, and a life expectancy of at least 6 months. The primary outcome was overall survival at 1 year and 2 years from the start of SABR treatment. The study is now completed. Between June 15, 2015, and Jan 30, 2019, 1422 patients were recruited from 17 hospitals in England. The median age of the patients was 69 years (IQR 62-76), and the most common primary tumour was prostate cancer (406 [28·6%] patients). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 6-23). Overall survival was 92·3% (95% CI 90·5-93·9) at 1 year and 79·2% (76·0-82·1) at 2 years. The most common grade 3 adverse event was fatigue (28 [2·0%] of 1422 patients) and the most common serious (grade 4) event was increased liver enzymes (nine [0·6%]). Notreatment-related deaths were reported. In patients with extracranial oligometastatic cancer, use of SABR was associated with high overall survival and low toxicity. 'The study findings complement existing evidence from a randomised, phase 2 trial, and represent high-level, real-world evidence supporting the use of SABR in this patient cohort, with a phase 3 randomised, controlled trial to confirm these findings underway. Based on the selection criteria in this study, SABR was commissioned by NHS England in March, 2020, as a treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease. NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation scheme.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly being used to treat oligometastatic cancers, but high-level evidence to provide a basis for policy making is scarce. Additional evidence from a real-world setting is required. We present the results of a national study of patients with extracranial oligometastases undergoing SABR, representing the largest dataset, to our knowledge, on outcomes in this population so far.
METHODS
In 2015, National Health Service (NHS) England launched a Commissioning through Evaluation scheme that funded a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study of patients with solid cancer and extracranial oligometastases treated with SABR. Prescribed doses ranged from 24-60 Gy administered in three to eight fractions. The study was done at 17 NHS radiotherapy centres in England. Patients were eligible for the scheme if aged 18 years or older with confirmed primary carcinoma (excluding haematological malignancies), one to three extracranial metastatic lesions, a disease-free interval from primary tumour development to metastases of longer than 6 months (with the exception of synchronous colorectal liver metastases), a WHO performance status of 2 or lower, and a life expectancy of at least 6 months. The primary outcome was overall survival at 1 year and 2 years from the start of SABR treatment. The study is now completed.
FINDINGS
Between June 15, 2015, and Jan 30, 2019, 1422 patients were recruited from 17 hospitals in England. The median age of the patients was 69 years (IQR 62-76), and the most common primary tumour was prostate cancer (406 [28·6%] patients). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 6-23). Overall survival was 92·3% (95% CI 90·5-93·9) at 1 year and 79·2% (76·0-82·1) at 2 years. The most common grade 3 adverse event was fatigue (28 [2·0%] of 1422 patients) and the most common serious (grade 4) event was increased liver enzymes (nine [0·6%]). Notreatment-related deaths were reported.
INTERPRETATION
In patients with extracranial oligometastatic cancer, use of SABR was associated with high overall survival and low toxicity. 'The study findings complement existing evidence from a randomised, phase 2 trial, and represent high-level, real-world evidence supporting the use of SABR in this patient cohort, with a phase 3 randomised, controlled trial to confirm these findings underway. Based on the selection criteria in this study, SABR was commissioned by NHS England in March, 2020, as a treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease.
FUNDING
NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation scheme.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33387498
pii: S1470-2045(20)30537-4
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30537-4
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

98-106

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT 203148/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Anastasia Chalkidou (A)

King's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: anastasia.chalkidou@kcl.ac.uk.

Thomas Macmillan (T)

King's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Mariusz T Grzeda (MT)

King's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Janet Peacock (J)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Jennifer Summers (J)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Saskia Eddy (S)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Bola Coker (B)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Hannah Patrick (H)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.

Helen Powell (H)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.

Lee Berry (L)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.

Gareth Webster (G)

Department of Medical Physics, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Worcester, UK.

Peter Ostler (P)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Peter D Dickinson (PD)

Clinical Oncology Department, St James's University Hospital and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Matthew Q Hatton (MQ)

Clinical Oncology Department, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Ann Henry (A)

Clinical Oncology Department, St James's University Hospital and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Stephen Keevil (S)

King's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Maria A Hawkins (MA)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Nick Slevin (N)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Nicholas van As (N)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH