Safety of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

CIED Cardiac device malfunction Implantable cardioverter defibrillator Pacemaker SABR Stereotactic radiotherapy

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 01 10 2020
accepted: 21 12 2020
pubmed: 3 1 2021
medline: 24 4 2021
entrez: 2 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The prevalence of patients with a cardiac implantable device (CIED) developing cancer and requiring a course of radiotherapy (RT) is increasing remarkably. Previously published reports agree that standard and conventionally fractionated RT is usually safe for CIEDs, but no "in-vivo" reports are available on the potential effects of thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) regimens to CIEDs functioning. The purpose of our study is therefore to evaluate the effects of SABR on CIEDs (pacemakers [PM] or implantable cardiac defibrillators [ICD]) in a cohort of patients affected by primary or metastatic lung lesions. We retrospectively collected all CIED-bearing patients undergoing SABR between 2007 and 2019 at our Institution. All CIEDs were interrogated before and after the SABR course to check for any malfunction. Prescription dose, beam energy and maximum dose (Dmax) to CIEDs were retrieved for each patient. Electrical records of the CIEDs were reviewed by the medical records. Thirty-four consecutive patients (24 with a PM and 10 with an ICD), who underwent 38 separate SABR courses, were included in the study. Eight patients (24%) were PM-dependent. Prescription dose of SABR ranged 26-60 Gy in 1-8 fractions, with a photon energy ranging 6-to-10 MV (76.3% and 23.7%, respectively) and a median Dmax to CIEDs of 0.17 Gy (range 0.04-1.97 Gy). Electrical parameters were stable in post-treatment device programming visits and no transient or persistent alteration of the CIED function was recorded in any patient. No inappropriate interventions were recorded in the 10 ICD-bearing patients during the treatment fractions. Thoracic SABR proved to be safe for CIEDs when the dose is kept <2 Gy and the beam energy is ≤10 MV, irrespective of the pacing-dependency and of the CIED type.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The prevalence of patients with a cardiac implantable device (CIED) developing cancer and requiring a course of radiotherapy (RT) is increasing remarkably. Previously published reports agree that standard and conventionally fractionated RT is usually safe for CIEDs, but no "in-vivo" reports are available on the potential effects of thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) regimens to CIEDs functioning. The purpose of our study is therefore to evaluate the effects of SABR on CIEDs (pacemakers [PM] or implantable cardiac defibrillators [ICD]) in a cohort of patients affected by primary or metastatic lung lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively collected all CIED-bearing patients undergoing SABR between 2007 and 2019 at our Institution. All CIEDs were interrogated before and after the SABR course to check for any malfunction. Prescription dose, beam energy and maximum dose (Dmax) to CIEDs were retrieved for each patient. Electrical records of the CIEDs were reviewed by the medical records.
RESULTS
Thirty-four consecutive patients (24 with a PM and 10 with an ICD), who underwent 38 separate SABR courses, were included in the study. Eight patients (24%) were PM-dependent. Prescription dose of SABR ranged 26-60 Gy in 1-8 fractions, with a photon energy ranging 6-to-10 MV (76.3% and 23.7%, respectively) and a median Dmax to CIEDs of 0.17 Gy (range 0.04-1.97 Gy). Electrical parameters were stable in post-treatment device programming visits and no transient or persistent alteration of the CIED function was recorded in any patient. No inappropriate interventions were recorded in the 10 ICD-bearing patients during the treatment fractions.
CONCLUSIONS
Thoracic SABR proved to be safe for CIEDs when the dose is kept <2 Gy and the beam energy is ≤10 MV, irrespective of the pacing-dependency and of the CIED type.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33387584
pii: S0167-8140(20)31256-1
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.029
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

193-198

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mario Levis (M)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy. Electronic address: mario.levis@unito.it.

Alessandro Andreis (A)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, University of Torino, Italy.

Serena Badellino (S)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy.

Carlo Budano (C)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, University of Torino, Italy.

Donatella Caivano (D)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy.

Marzia Cerrato (M)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy.

Erika Orlandi (E)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy.

Arianna Bissolino (A)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, University of Torino, Italy.

Gloria Angelico (G)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, University of Torino, Italy.

Chiara Cavallin (C)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy.

Francesca R Giglioli (FR)

Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.

Gaetano M De Ferrari (GM)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, University of Torino, Italy.

Umberto Ricardi (U)

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH