Morphological Metaphor Mapping of Moral Concepts in Chinese Culture.
Chinese culture
conceptual metaphor theory
moral concept
morphological metaphor
rotation
shape
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
04
2020
accepted:
02
11
2020
entrez:
4
1
2021
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to conceptual metaphor theory, individuals are thought to understand or express abstract concepts by using referents in the physical world-right and left for moral and immoral, for example. In this research, we used a modified Stroop paradigm to explore how abstract moral concepts are metaphorically translated onto physical referents in Chinese culture using the Chinese language. We presented Chinese characters related to moral and immoral abstract concepts in either non-distorted or distorted positions (Study 1) or rotated to the right or to the left (Study 2). When we asked participants to identify the Chinese characters, they more quickly and accurately identified morally positive characters if they were oriented upright or turned to the right and more quickly and accurately identified immoral characters when the characters were distorted or rotated left. These results support the idea that physical cues are used in metaphorically encoding social abstractions and moral norms and provided cross-cultural validation for conceptual metaphor theory, which would predict our results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33391073
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554061
pmc: PMC7774603
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
554061Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Liu, Li, Li, Zhang, Lin, DiFabrizio and Wang.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(1):93-110
pubmed: 10617294
Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1045-67
pubmed: 20822208
Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1219-22
pubmed: 19121126
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec 1;39(7):1257-1267
pubmed: 20046813
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Aug;11(4):490-508
pubmed: 3161988
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1554
pubmed: 30210396
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 May;25(3):721-42
pubmed: 10368929
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):1019-25
pubmed: 19619180
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 26;10:1654
pubmed: 31402884
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Oct;31(10):1459-68
pubmed: 20108224
Psychophysiology. 2011 Feb;48(2):176-86
pubmed: 20624252
Science. 2006 Sep 8;313(5792):1451-2
pubmed: 16960010
Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 25;1:242
pubmed: 21833295
Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):82-7
pubmed: 14738513
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:557
pubmed: 28446889
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 05;9:1145
pubmed: 30026717
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):838-44
pubmed: 18792513
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jun;17(6):905-17
pubmed: 16021798
Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 2;27(4):247-56
pubmed: 26807699
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):627-30
pubmed: 19804790