Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders-A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals.

assessment criminal responsibility paraphilic disorders sexual offender sexual violence

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 01 10 2020
accepted: 26 11 2020
entrez: 4 1 2021
pubmed: 5 1 2021
medline: 5 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prevention of sexual violence is a major goal of sexual health. In cases of accused sexual offenders, the assessment of diminished criminal responsibility of the accused is one of the most important procedures undertaken by experts in the German legal system. This assessment follows a two-stage method assessing first the severity of a paraphilic disorder and then second criteria for or against diminished capacity. The present study examines the predictive validity of two different sets of criteria for the assessment of criminal responsibility in the context of paraphilic disorders combined with sexual offending. Two exemplary case vignettes of two suspected sexual offenders were developed to assess the criteria. For each participant, one of the two exemplary case vignettes was randomly presented. The presentation of the two different sets of criteria was also randomized, so that each participant was assigned only one of the two criteria sets to rate one of the presented cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33391132
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613081
pmc: PMC7775361
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

613081

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Dobbrunz, Daubmann, Müller and Briken.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1615-1622
pubmed: 31447381
Nervenarzt. 2020 May 11;:
pubmed: 32394005
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2002 Dec;46(6):668-77
pubmed: 12491844
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Jun;139(6):572-581
pubmed: 30864151
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jul;45(5):1163-72
pubmed: 26754158
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Aug;28(4):357-68
pubmed: 15499820
Nervenarzt. 2014 Mar;85(3):304-11
pubmed: 24603948
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Dec;73(6):1154-63
pubmed: 16392988
Psychol Assess. 2009 Mar;21(1):1-21
pubmed: 19290762

Auteurs

Sascha Dobbrunz (S)

Institute of Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Anne Daubmann (A)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Jürgen Leo Müller (JL)

Professorship for Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Peer Briken (P)

Institute of Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH