Developing and testing an algorithm for automatic segmentation of the fetal face from three-dimensional ultrasound images.
craniofacial abnormalities
image segmentation
three-dimensional ultrasound
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
17
08
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
entrez:
4
1
2021
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fetal craniofacial abnormalities are challenging to detect and diagnose on prenatal ultrasound (US). Image segmentation and computer analysis of three-dimensional US volumes of the fetal face may provide an objective measure to quantify fetal facial features and identify abnormalities. We have developed and tested an atlas-based partially automated facial segmentation algorithm; however, the volumes require additional manual segmentation (MS), which is time and labour intensive and may preclude this method from clinical adoption. These manually refined segmentations can then be used as a reference (atlas) by the partially automated segmentation algorithm to improve algorithmic performance with the aim of eliminating the need for manual refinement and developing a fully automated system. This study assesses the inter- and intra-operator variability of MS and tests an optimized version of our automatic segmentation (AS) algorithm. The manual refinements of 15 fetal faces performed by three operators and repeated by one operator were assessed by Dice score, average symmetrical surface distance and volume difference. The performance of the partially automatic algorithm with difference size atlases was evaluated by Dice score and computational time. Assessment of the manual refinements showed low inter- and intra-operator variability demonstrating its suitability for optimizing the AS algorithm. The algorithm showed improved performance following an increase in the atlas size in turn reducing the need for manual refinement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33391808
doi: 10.1098/rsos.201342
pii: rsos201342
pmc: PMC7735327
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
201342Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests, financial or otherwise.
Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):668-670
pubmed: 26480950
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):10-2
pubmed: 11125244
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Jan;38(1):10-19
pubmed: 28654730
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):19-24
pubmed: 15690554
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Feb;41(2):542-56
pubmed: 25542486
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):716-24
pubmed: 18218550
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 7;58(21):7513-26
pubmed: 24099882
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010 Jun;98(3):278-84
pubmed: 19818524
Med Image Anal. 2013 Aug;17(6):671-84
pubmed: 23510558
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):76.e1-76.e8
pubmed: 28209493
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 May;60(5):1388-400
pubmed: 23292786
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):12-8
pubmed: 15619313
Clin Genet. 2015 Jul;88(1):1-12
pubmed: 25209348
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):747-757
pubmed: 30712880
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
pubmed: 11701515
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;35(2):195-200
pubmed: 20014328
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:9701762
pubmed: 29410600
Prenat Diagn. 2007 Jul;27(7):629-32
pubmed: 17497749
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Prenat Diagn. 2006 Apr;26(4):340-4
pubmed: 16566035
Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1430-1437
pubmed: 29595812
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar;33(3):684-91
pubmed: 21563253