Validation of HR-pQCT against micro-CT for morphometric and biomechanical analyses: A review.
Bone morphometrics
Finite element analysis
HR-pQCT
Micro-CT
Patient evaluation
Segmentation
Journal
Bone reports
ISSN: 2352-1872
Titre abrégé: Bone Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101646176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
25
06
2020
revised:
29
07
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
entrez:
4
1
2021
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed-tomography (HR-pQCT) has the potential to become a powerful clinical assessment and diagnostic tool. Given the recent improvements in image resolution, from 82 to 61 μm, this technology may be used to accurately quantify in vivo bone microarchitecture, a key biomarker of degenerative bone diseases. However, computational methods to assess bone microarchitecture were developed for micro computed tomography (micro-CT), a higher-resolution technology only available for ex vivo studies, and validation of these computational analysis techniques against the gold-standard micro-CT has been inconsistent and incomplete. Herein, we review methods for segmentation of bone compartments and microstructure, quantification of bone morphology, and estimation of mechanical strength using finite-element analysis, highlighting the need throughout for improved standardization across the field. Studies have relied on homogenous datasets for validation, which does not allow for robust comparisons between methods. Consequently, the adaptation and validation of novel segmentation approaches has been slow to non-existent, with most studies still using the manufacturer's segmentation for morphometric analysis despite the existence of better performing alternative approaches. The promising accuracy of HR-pQCT for capturing morphometric indices is overshadowed by considerable variability in outcomes between studies. For finite element analysis (FEA) methods, the use of disparate material models and FEA tools has led to a fragmented ability to assess mechanical bone strength with HR-pQCT. Further, the scarcity of studies comparing 62 μm HR-pQCT to the gold standard micro-CT leaves the validation of this imaging modality incomplete. This review revealed that without standardization, the capabilities of HR-pQCT cannot be adequately assessed. The need for a public, extendable, heterogeneous dataset of HR-pQCT and corresponding gold-standard micro-CT images, which would allow HR-pQCT users to benchmark existing and novel methods and select optimal methods depending on the scientific question and data at hand, is now evident. With more recent advancements in HR-pQCT, the community must learn from its past and provide properly validated technologies to ensure that HR-pQCT can truly provide value in patient diagnosis and care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33392364
doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100711
pii: S2352-1872(20)30471-X
pmc: PMC7772687
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
100711Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):529-41
pubmed: 12230356
Bone. 2016 May;86:58-67
pubmed: 26924718
Bone. 2004 Apr;34(4):736-46
pubmed: 15050906
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jul;28(7):1666-78
pubmed: 23456922
Med Eng Phys. 2007 Dec;29(10):1096-105
pubmed: 17229586
Bone. 2015 Oct;79:213-21
pubmed: 26079995
Calcif Tissue Int. 1996 Jan;58(1):24-9
pubmed: 8825235
Calcif Tissue Int. 2001 Jan;68(1):38-42
pubmed: 12037622
Bone. 2008 Apr;42(4):728-36
pubmed: 18276202
J Biomech. 1996 Dec;29(12):1653-7
pubmed: 8945668
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1999 Mar-Apr;23(2):69-74
pubmed: 10227372
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Jul;33(7):1312-1317
pubmed: 29489033
J Biomech. 1994 Apr;27(4):375-89
pubmed: 8188719
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Sep;14 Suppl 5:S89-95; discussion S95-9
pubmed: 14504712
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4930-7
pubmed: 20964212
Technol Health Care. 1998 Dec;6(5-6):329-37
pubmed: 10100936
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;455:273-92
pubmed: 18463825
Bone. 2017 Apr;97:114-120
pubmed: 28109918
Bone. 1998 May;22(5):437-43
pubmed: 9600776
Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Aug;101(2):132-140
pubmed: 28349184
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Oct;48 Suppl 4:iv3-8
pubmed: 19783591
Bone. 2014 Jun;63:7-14
pubmed: 24582804
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Mar;67(3):924-930
pubmed: 31247539
Phys Med Biol. 1994 Jan;39(1):145-64
pubmed: 7651993
Bone. 2013 Oct;56(2):363-74
pubmed: 23850483
J Biomech. 1995 Jan;28(1):69-81
pubmed: 7852443
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 May;34(5):867-874
pubmed: 30912861
Osteoporos Int. 2014 May;25(5):1595-606
pubmed: 24566588
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):124-6
pubmed: 18202065
J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jul;14(7):1167-74
pubmed: 10404017
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 May;38(3):326-32
pubmed: 10912350
J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Sep;26(9):2184-93
pubmed: 21557311
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep;31(9):1607-1627
pubmed: 32458029
J Bone Miner Res. 2001 May;16(5):799-805
pubmed: 11341324
J Bone Miner Res. 1987 Dec;2(6):595-610
pubmed: 3455637
Bone. 2004 Dec;35(6):1375-82
pubmed: 15589219
Med Eng Phys. 2007 May;29(4):480-90
pubmed: 16908211
Bone. 1997 Dec;21(6):541-6
pubmed: 9430245
Bone. 1999 Jan;24(1):35-9
pubmed: 9916782
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Oct;27(10):2955-66
pubmed: 27155883
Bone. 2019 Mar;120:439-445
pubmed: 30553853
Bone. 2011 Mar 1;48(3):433-42
pubmed: 20950723
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Feb;21(2):263-73
pubmed: 19455271
Bone. 2015 Apr;73:167-75
pubmed: 25540917
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015 Oct 13;6:162
pubmed: 26528241
Bone. 2018 Jan;106:69-77
pubmed: 28986143
Med Image Anal. 2010 Jun;14(3):276-90
pubmed: 20163980
J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jul;32(7):1514-1524
pubmed: 28294415
Bone. 1993 Mar-Apr;14(2):173-82
pubmed: 8334036
J Microsc. 1974 Jul;101(Pt 2):153-68
pubmed: 4610138
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012;15(7):711-20
pubmed: 21480081
Technol Health Care. 1996 Apr;4(1):113-9
pubmed: 8773313
Bone. 2009 Nov;45(5):909-17
pubmed: 19615478
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2014 Jan;36(1):2-17
pubmed: 24231862
J Bone Miner Res. 1989 Feb;4(1):3-11
pubmed: 2718776
J Biomech. 2018 Oct 26;80:63-71
pubmed: 30201250
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1893-903
pubmed: 22482611
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 11;11(8):e0161101
pubmed: 27513664
J Biomech Eng. 2019 Jan 31;:
pubmed: 30703208
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jan;65:644-651
pubmed: 27741494
J Biomech. 1994 Apr;27(4):433-44
pubmed: 8188724
J Biomech. 2010 Aug 26;43(12):2374-80
pubmed: 20462582
Bone. 2007 Oct;41(4):505-15
pubmed: 17693147
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Apr;25(4):882-90
pubmed: 19839766
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Aug;21(8):1383-90
pubmed: 19771488
J Biomech Eng. 2019 Jul 1;:
pubmed: 31260520
Bone. 2006 Aug;39(2):345-52
pubmed: 16571382
Bone. 2010 Sep;47(3):519-28
pubmed: 20561906
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;69(8):1580-1587
pubmed: 28493323
J R Soc Interface. 2016 Jan;13(114):20150991
pubmed: 26790999
Bone. 2013 May;54(1):8-20
pubmed: 23334082
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Dec 21;61(24):8553-8576
pubmed: 27845939
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 11;17:271
pubmed: 27401097
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Apr;25(4):746-56
pubmed: 19775199
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018 Dec;17(6):1715-1730
pubmed: 29987700
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2008 Oct;11(5):477-87
pubmed: 18608338
Med Image Anal. 2012 Jul;16(5):952-65
pubmed: 22465079
Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Oct;35(10):1678-86
pubmed: 17602299
Phys Med Biol. 1989 Jun;34(6):741-9
pubmed: 2740441