Building Capacity for Evidence-Informed Priority Setting in the Indian Health System: An International Collaborative Experience.
Capacity Building
Health Economics
Health Technology Assessment
Health policy
India
Journal
Health policy OPEN
ISSN: 2590-2296
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101768951
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
10
07
2019
revised:
09
12
2019
accepted:
17
02
2020
entrez:
4
1
2021
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
India's rapid economic growth has been accompanied by slower improvements in population health. Given the need to reconcile the ambitious goal of achieving Universal Coverage with limited resources, a robust priority-setting mechanism is required to ensure that the right trade-offs are made and the impact on health is maximised. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is endorsed by the World Health Assembly as the gold standard approach to synthesizing evidence systematically for evidence-informed priority setting (EIPS). India is formally committed to institutionalising HTA as an integral component of the EIPS process. The effective conduct and uptake of HTA depends on a well-functioning ecosystem of stakeholders adept at commissioning and generating policy-relevant HTA research, developing and utilising rigorous technical, transparent, and inclusive methods and processes, and a strong multisectoral and transnational appetite for the use of evidence to inform policy. These all require myriad complex and complementary capacities to be built at each level of the health system . In this paper we describe how a framework for targeted and locally-tailored capacity building for EIPS, and specifically HTA, was collaboratively developed and implemented by an international network of priority-setting expertise, and the Government of India.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33392500
doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100004
pii: S2590-2296(20)30002-2
pmc: PMC7772949
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100004Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Références
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Oct;11(5):726-733
pubmed: 30288270
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Feb 19;41:e138
pubmed: 29466522
Health Policy. 2013 Oct;112(3):202-8
pubmed: 23953877
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:241-52
pubmed: 19527543
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020311
pubmed: 30479747
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jun 26;2(2):e000259
pubmed: 29225927
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):595-613
pubmed: 26449485
PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 7;16(3):e1002759
pubmed: 30845199
Indian J Med Res. 2018 Sep;148(3):258-261
pubmed: 30425215
F1000Res. 2018 Feb 28;7:245
pubmed: 29770210
F1000Res. 2017 Mar 7;6:231
pubmed: 28721199
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):115
pubmed: 30486827
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jan;34(1):1-3
pubmed: 26660528
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2296-2306
pubmed: 27642020
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Jun 15;55(6):495-506
pubmed: 29978817
Glob Heart. 2012 Mar;7(1):13-34
pubmed: 25691165
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Mar;2(1):1-3
pubmed: 29464668
Indian J Med Res. 2018 Aug;148(2):180-189
pubmed: 30381541
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Sep;146(3):354-361
pubmed: 29355142
Indian J Community Med. 2011 Jul;36(3):239-40
pubmed: 22090684
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160986
pubmed: 27536781
Lancet. 2015 Dec 12;386(10011):2422-35
pubmed: 26700532
Lancet. 2011 Feb 26;377(9767):760-8
pubmed: 21227489
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1527556
pubmed: 30326795