Listening to the HysterSisters: A Retrospective Keyword Frequency Analysis of Conversations About Hysterectomy Recovery.

gynecology hysterectomy perceived recovery social media

Journal

JMIR perioperative medicine
ISSN: 2561-9128
Titre abrégé: JMIR Perioper Med
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101771348

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 07 04 2018
accepted: 28 07 2019
revised: 23 01 2019
entrez: 4 1 2021
pubmed: 26 9 2019
medline: 26 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the postoperative period, individual patient experiences vary widely and are based on a diverse set of input variables influenced by all stakeholders in and throughout the surgical process. Although clinical research has primarily focused on clinical and administrative datasets to characterize the postoperative recovery experience, there is increasing interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The growth of online communities in which patients themselves participate provides a venue to study PROMs directly. One such forum-based community is HysterSisters, dedicated to helping individuals through the experience of hysterectomy, a major surgery which removes the uterus. The surgery can be performed by a variety of methods such as minimally invasive approaches or the traditional abdominal approach using a larger incision. The community offers support for "medical and emotional issues [...] from diagnosis, to treatment, to recovery." Users can specify when and what type of hysterectomy they underwent. They can discuss their shared experience of hysterectomy and provide, among other interactions, feedback, reassurance, sympathy, or advice, thus providing a unique view into conversations surrounding the hysterectomy experience. We aimed to characterize conversations about hysterectomy recovery as experienced by users of the HysterSisters online community. A retrospective keyword frequency analysis of the HysterSisters Hysterectomy Recovery forum was performed. Within the Hysterectomy Recovery forum, 33,311 unique users declared their hysterectomy date and type and posted during the first 12 weeks postsurgery. A taxonomy of 8 primary symptom groups was created using a seed list of keywords generated from a term frequency analysis of these threads. Pain and bleeding were the two most mentioned symptom groups and account for almost half of all symptom mentions (19,965/40,127). For symptoms categories such as pain and hormones and emotions, there was no difference in the proportion of users mentioning related keywords, regardless of the type of hysterectomy, whereas bleeding-related or intimacy-related keywords were mentioned more frequently by users undergoing certain minimally invasive approaches when compared with those undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Temporal patterns in symptom mentions were noted as well. The majority of all posting activity occurred in the first 3 weeks. Across all keyword groups, individuals reporting minimally invasive procedures ceased forum use of these keywords significantly earlier than those reporting abdominal hysterectomy. Peaks in conversation volume surrounding particular symptom categories were also identified at 1, 3, and 6 weeks postoperatively. The HysterSisters Hysterectomy Recovery forum and other such forums centered on users' health care experience can provide novel actionable insights that can improve patient-centered care during the postoperative period. This study adds another dimension to the utility of social media analytics by demonstrating that measurement of post volumes and distribution of symptom mentions over time reveal key opportunities for beneficial symptom-specific patient engagement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In the postoperative period, individual patient experiences vary widely and are based on a diverse set of input variables influenced by all stakeholders in and throughout the surgical process. Although clinical research has primarily focused on clinical and administrative datasets to characterize the postoperative recovery experience, there is increasing interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The growth of online communities in which patients themselves participate provides a venue to study PROMs directly. One such forum-based community is HysterSisters, dedicated to helping individuals through the experience of hysterectomy, a major surgery which removes the uterus. The surgery can be performed by a variety of methods such as minimally invasive approaches or the traditional abdominal approach using a larger incision. The community offers support for "medical and emotional issues [...] from diagnosis, to treatment, to recovery." Users can specify when and what type of hysterectomy they underwent. They can discuss their shared experience of hysterectomy and provide, among other interactions, feedback, reassurance, sympathy, or advice, thus providing a unique view into conversations surrounding the hysterectomy experience.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to characterize conversations about hysterectomy recovery as experienced by users of the HysterSisters online community.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective keyword frequency analysis of the HysterSisters Hysterectomy Recovery forum was performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Within the Hysterectomy Recovery forum, 33,311 unique users declared their hysterectomy date and type and posted during the first 12 weeks postsurgery. A taxonomy of 8 primary symptom groups was created using a seed list of keywords generated from a term frequency analysis of these threads. Pain and bleeding were the two most mentioned symptom groups and account for almost half of all symptom mentions (19,965/40,127). For symptoms categories such as pain and hormones and emotions, there was no difference in the proportion of users mentioning related keywords, regardless of the type of hysterectomy, whereas bleeding-related or intimacy-related keywords were mentioned more frequently by users undergoing certain minimally invasive approaches when compared with those undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Temporal patterns in symptom mentions were noted as well. The majority of all posting activity occurred in the first 3 weeks. Across all keyword groups, individuals reporting minimally invasive procedures ceased forum use of these keywords significantly earlier than those reporting abdominal hysterectomy. Peaks in conversation volume surrounding particular symptom categories were also identified at 1, 3, and 6 weeks postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The HysterSisters Hysterectomy Recovery forum and other such forums centered on users' health care experience can provide novel actionable insights that can improve patient-centered care during the postoperative period. This study adds another dimension to the utility of social media analytics by demonstrating that measurement of post volumes and distribution of symptom mentions over time reveal key opportunities for beneficial symptom-specific patient engagement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33393919
pii: v2i2e10728
doi: 10.2196/10728
pmc: PMC7735658
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10728

Informations de copyright

©Arpit Dave, Johnny Yi, Andy Boothe, Helene Brashear, Jeffrey Byrne, Yash Gad. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 26.09.2019.

Références

Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):e120-e130
pubmed: 30134426
IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2010 Nov 1;27(6):55-65
pubmed: 25104898
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1998 Jan;27(1):55-61
pubmed: 9583046
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167
pubmed: 23358487
Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13(4):867-72
pubmed: 9619539
Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11
pubmed: 25048103
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):233-241
pubmed: 23969789
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):575-82
pubmed: 27044954
Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Nov;30(11):604-11
pubmed: 22918135
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):83
pubmed: 31234852
Perioper Med (Lond). 2019 May 22;8:3
pubmed: 31139359
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158
pubmed: 20168127
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5
pubmed: 10740540
BJOG. 2014 Mar;121(4):487-97
pubmed: 24245993
Open Nurs J. 2008;2:1-7
pubmed: 19319214
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):266-73
pubmed: 24801549
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):271-8
pubmed: 16700641
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Sep 09;4(1):
pubmed: 26734405
ACOG Educ Bull. 1997 Nov;(242):1-7
pubmed: 12295376
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):311-7
pubmed: 17478361
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;(8):CD003677
pubmed: 26264829
BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1127-35; discussion 1136
pubmed: 24511914
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Mar;57(5):552-8
pubmed: 17284272

Auteurs

Arpit Dave (A)

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Gynecology, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Johnny Yi (J)

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Gynecology, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Andy Boothe (A)

W2O Group, Austin, TX, United States.

Helene Brashear (H)

W2O Group, Austin, TX, United States.

Jeffrey Byrne (J)

W2O Group, Austin, TX, United States.

Yash Gad (Y)

W2O Group, Austin, TX, United States.

Classifications MeSH