Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: A multicenter survey-based study assessing satisfaction and quality of life.
pyoderma gangrenosum
quality of life
satisfaction
survey
treatment
Journal
Dermatologic therapy
ISSN: 1529-8019
Titre abrégé: Dermatol Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9700070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
revised:
04
12
2020
received:
06
10
2020
accepted:
21
12
2020
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
26
5
2021
entrez:
4
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) lacks consensus regarding treatment, and no prior studies assess treatment satisfaction in PG. The objective of this study was to determine patient-reported satisfaction in the treatment of PG, and associations with satisfaction. Methodology was a multicenter cross-sectional survey for patients who received systemic medication(s) to treat PG. Thirty-five patients completed the survey (mean age: 54.0 years, 65.7% female, response rate: 81.4%). Mean (± SD) SATMED-Q score was 75.0 (±16.2, range: 67.6-85.3). Older patients (72.6 ± 23.6 for 18-39 years, 74.4 ± 16.1 for 40-59, 77.1 ± 11.6 for 60+), plus those with higher incomes (72.9 ± 20.3 for $0-49 000; 74.0 ± 17.6 for $50 000-99 000; 79.0 ± 14.6 for $100 000+) and education status (69.4 ± 14.3 for high school equivalent, 72.9 ± 15.9 for undergraduate, 91.7 ± 10.6 for graduate), were more satisfied with treatment. Ulcerative PG had higher SATMED-Q scores (79.0 ± 13.2) than other subtypes (66.2 ± 19.3). For local therapy, wound care, or pain control, 63.2%, 100%, and 75% were satisfied, respectively. The mean DLQI was 8.6 (±7.6, range: 0-29), and higher DLQI was associated with decreased satisfaction. Satisfaction with providers was positively correlated with global satisfaction (Pearson's r = 0.638). The presence of pain and/or depression influenced both SATMED-Q (72.8 ± 18.8 with pain, 78.3 ± 11.2 without; 68.2 ± 18.8 with depression, 80.1 ± 12.2 without) and DLQI scores (12.1 ± 8.1 with pain, 3.9 ± 3.4 without; 10.3 ± 7.1 with depression, 7.4 ± 8.0 without). To optimize the patient experience, non-modifiable associations should be individually considered, and potentially modifiable associations such as satisfaction with specific providers, pain, and depression, may be targeted for management.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14736Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Ighani A, Al-Mutairi D, Rahmani A, Weizman AV, Piguet V, Alavi A. Pyoderma gangrenosum and its impact on quality of life: a multicentre, prospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(3):672-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17347.
McKenzie F, Arthur M, Ortega-Loayza AG. Pyoderma gangrenosum: what do we know now? Curr Dermatol Rep. 2018;7(3):147-157.
Pyle ASW. The lived experience of having pyoderma gangrenosum: A phenomenological study. Paper Presented at: Wounds UK Annual Conference; November 5-7, 2018; Cardiff, Wales.
Lee MP, Zullo SW, Sobanko JF, Etzkorn JR. Patient-centered care in dermatologic surgery: practical strategies to improve the patient experience and visit satisfaction. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37(3):367-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2019.03.006.
Plewnia A, Bengel J, Körner M. Patient-centeredness and its impact on patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in medical rehabilitation. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(12):2063-2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.018.
Ruiz MA, Pardo A, Rejas J, Soto J, Villasante F, Aranguren JL. Development and validation of the "Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire" (SATMED-Q). Value Health. 2008;11(5):913-926. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00323.x.
Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x.
Herberger K, Rustenbach SJ, Haartje O, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients with leg ulcers-results of a community-based study. Vasa. 2011;40(2):131-138. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000083.
Poot F. Doctor-patient relations in dermatology: obligations and rights for a mutual satisfaction. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(11):1233-1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03297.x.
Beiteke U, Bigge S, Reichenberger C, Gralow I. Pain and pain management in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015;13(10):967-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12822.
Binus AM, Qureshi AA, Li VW, Winterfield LS. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a retrospective review of patient characteristics, comorbidities and therapy in 103 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165:1244-1250.
Brenaut E, De Salins CA, Misery L, Roguedas-Contios AM. Patient satisfaction in dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(7):e343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14137.
Søndergaard MB, Ghazanfar MN, Thomsen SF. Patient expectations and determinants of patient satisfaction in a dermatology outpatient clinic. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Jan;33(1):e32-e33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15144.
Fayne RA, Borda LJ, Egger AN, Tomic-Canic M. The potential impact of social genomics on wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2020;9(6):325-331. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2019.1095.
Wang JV, Ross N, Keller M. Evaluating cultural competency and patient satisfaction in an urban dermatology clinic. Dermatol Online J. 2017;23(6):1-3.