Drilling Speed and Bone Temperature of a Robot-assisted Ultrasonic Osteotome Applied to Vertebral Cancellous Bone.
Journal
Spine
ISSN: 1528-1159
Titre abrégé: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7610646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2021
15 Jul 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
21
7
2021
entrez:
4
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An experimental investigation of a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome applied to vertebral cancellous bone. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various ultrasonic parameter settings on temperature in the drilling site and penetration time and determine the most suitable parameters for efficient and safe robot-based ultrasonically assisted bone drilling in spinal surgery. A robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome device may be safe and effective for spinal drilling. Sixty specimens of bovine vertebral cancellous were randomly assigned to one of six groups, which varied by mode of ultrasonic vibration (L-T and L) and feed rate (one percent [0.8 mm/s], two percent [1.6 mm/s], and three pecent [2.4 mm/s]). Maximum temperature in the drilling site and penetration time was recorded. Maximum temperature in the drilling site decreased as output power increased for L-T and L modes, was significantly lower for L-T compared to L mode at each feed rate and power setting, was significantly different at feed rates of 1.6 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s and 2.4 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s for L-T mode at an output power of 60 W and 84 W, but was not influenced by feed rate for L mode. Penetration time did not significantly improve as output power increased for both L-T and L modes, was significantly decreased with increased feed rates, but was not significantly different between L-T and L modes. The optimal parameters for applying a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome to vertebral cancellous bone are L-T mode, maximum output power of 120 W, and maximum feed rate of 2.4 mm/s.Level of Evidence: 4.
Sections du résumé
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
An experimental investigation of a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome applied to vertebral cancellous bone.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various ultrasonic parameter settings on temperature in the drilling site and penetration time and determine the most suitable parameters for efficient and safe robot-based ultrasonically assisted bone drilling in spinal surgery.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
BACKGROUND
A robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome device may be safe and effective for spinal drilling.
METHODS
METHODS
Sixty specimens of bovine vertebral cancellous were randomly assigned to one of six groups, which varied by mode of ultrasonic vibration (L-T and L) and feed rate (one percent [0.8 mm/s], two percent [1.6 mm/s], and three pecent [2.4 mm/s]). Maximum temperature in the drilling site and penetration time was recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Maximum temperature in the drilling site decreased as output power increased for L-T and L modes, was significantly lower for L-T compared to L mode at each feed rate and power setting, was significantly different at feed rates of 1.6 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s and 2.4 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s for L-T mode at an output power of 60 W and 84 W, but was not influenced by feed rate for L mode. Penetration time did not significantly improve as output power increased for both L-T and L modes, was significantly decreased with increased feed rates, but was not significantly different between L-T and L modes.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The optimal parameters for applying a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome to vertebral cancellous bone are L-T mode, maximum output power of 120 W, and maximum feed rate of 2.4 mm/s.Level of Evidence: 4.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33394989
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003902
pii: 00007632-202107150-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E760-E768Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Slack PS, Coulson CJ, Ma X, et al. The effect of operating time on surgeons’ muscular fatigue. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90:651–657.
Brioschi V, Cook J, Arthurs GI. Can a surgeon drill accurately at a specified angle? Vet Rec Open 2016; 3:e000172.
Ghasem A, Sharma A, Greif DN, et al. The arrival of robotics in spine surgery: a review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43:1670–1677.
Joseph JR, Smith BW, Liu X, et al. Current applications of robotics in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42:E2.
Guan F, Sun Y, Qi X, et al. State recognition of bone drilling based on acoustic emission in pedicle screw operation. Sensors (Basel) 2018; 18:1484.
Wang H, Zhou Y, Liu J, et al. Robot assisted navigated drilling for percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a preliminary animal study. Indian J Orthop 2015; 49:452–457.
Rastelli MM Jr, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. Application of ultrasonic bone curette in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: technical note. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75:90–95.
Li K, Zhang W, Li B, et al. Safety and efficacy of cervical laminoplasty using a piezosurgery device compared with a high-speed drill. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4913.
Schaeren S, Jaquiery C, Heberer M, et al. Assessment of nerve damage using a novel ultrasonic device for bone cutting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:593–596.
Salami A, Dellepiane M, Salzano FA, et al. Piezosurgery in the excision of middle-ear tumors: effects on mineralized and non-mineralized tissues. Med Sci Monit 2007; 13:PI25–PI29.
Sun Z, Wang Y, Xu K, et al. Experimental investigations of drilling temperature of high-energy ultrasonically assisted bone drilling. Med Eng Phys 2019; 65:1–7.
Lee J, Ozdoganlar OB, Rabin Y. An experimental investigation on thermal exposure during bone drilling. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34:1510–1520.
Kim CH, Chung CK, Choi Y, et al. The efficacy of ultrasonic bone scalpel for unilateral cervical open-door laminoplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2020; 86:825–834.
Wahlquist S, Nelson S, Glivar P. Effect of the ultrasonic bone scalpel on blood loss during pediatric spinal deformity correction surgery. Spine Deform 2019; 7:582–585.
Onen MR, Yuvruk E, Akay S, et al. The reliability of the ultrasonic bone scalpel in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study of 46 patients. World Neurosurg 2015; 84:1962–1967.
Nakase H, Matsuda R, Shin Y, et al. The use of ultrasonic bone curettes in spinal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148:207–212.
Dave BR, Degulmadi D, Dahibhate S, et al. Ultrasonic bone scalpel: utility in cervical corpectomy. A technical note. Eur Spine J 2019; 28:380–385.
Augustin G, Zigman T, Davila S, et al. Cortical bone drilling and thermal osteonecrosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27:313–325.
Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:101–107.
Lundskog J. Heat and bone tissue. An experimental investigation of the thermal properties of bone and threshold levels for thermal injury. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 9:1–80.
Berman AT, Reid JS, Yanicko DR Jr, et al. Thermally induced bone necrosis in rabbits. Relation to implant failure in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 284–292.
Krause WR. Orthogonal bone cutting: saw design and operating characteristics. J Biomech Eng 1987; 109:263–271.
Singh TS, Yusoff AH, Chian YK. How safe is high-speed burring in spine surgery? An in vitro study on the effect of rotational speed and heat generation in the bovine spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40:E866–E872.
Alam K, Bahadur IM, Ahmed N. Cortical bone drilling: an experimental and numerical study. Technol Health Care 2014; 23:223–231.
Singh RP, Pandey PM, Mridha AR. An in-vitro study of temperature rise during rotary ultrasonic bone drilling of human bone. Med Eng Phys 2020; 79:33–43.
Tai BL, Palmisano AC, Belmont B, et al. Numerical evaluation of sequential bone drilling strategies based on thermal damage. Med Eng Phys 2015; 37:855–861.
Zheng Q, Xia L, Zhang X, et al. Reduction thermal damage to cortical bone using ultrasonically-assisted drilling. Technol Health Care 2018; 26:843–856.
Lee J, Gozen BA, Ozdoganlar OB. Modeling and experimentation of bone drilling forces. J Biomech 2012; 45:1076–1083.
Yacker MJ, Klein M. The effect of irrigation on osteotomy depth and bur diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:634–638.
Augustin G, Davila S, Mihoci K, et al. Thermal osteonecrosis and bone drilling parameters revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128:71–77.
Suzuki K, Wanibuchi M, Minamida Y, et al. Heat generation by ultrasonic bone curette comparing with high-speed drill. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160:721–725.
Mercan U, Sumer M, Kaya OA, et al. An In-vitro study on thermal changes during implant drilling with different irrigation volumes. Niger J Clin Pract 2019; 22:350–354.
Lee J, Rabin Y, Ozdoganlar OB. A new thermal model for bone drilling with applications to orthopaedic surgery. Med Eng Phys 2011; 33:1234–1244.
Gupta V, Singh RP, Pandey PM, et al. In vitro comparison of conventional surgical and rotary ultrasonic bone drilling techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2020; 234:398–411.