MACULAR SENSITIVITY IN THE AREA OF INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN EYES AFTER PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY WITH THE TEMPORAL INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR A FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE.
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2021
01 Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
8
1
2022
entrez:
4
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the relationship between retinal sensitivity and the area of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during pars plana vitrectomy for a full-thickness macular hole. Twenty-four eyes a minimum of 6 months after temporal inverted flap pars plana vitrectomy for a full-thickness macular hole were included in the study. En face spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images were used to assess margins of the peeled ILM area. Microperimetry was performed to examine retinal sensitivity within the central 10°. Areas of peeled ILM in en face optical coherence tomography images were correlated with the average sensitivity threshold. Retinal sensitivities at the location of each measurement point were compared with structural abnormalities observed in en face spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. The mean retinal sensitivity in the area of ILM removal was significantly lower compared with the area of preserved ILM (24.29 ± 3.96 dB vs. 26.19 ± 2.10 dB, P < 0.0001, respectively). The peeled ILM area showed a negative correlation with the average sensitivity threshold (r = -0.56, P < 0.01). A larger area of ILM peeling during temporal inverted flap pars plana vitrectomy for a full-thickness macular hole is related to lower retinal sensitivity in the central macula.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33395220
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003096
pii: 00006982-202108000-00007
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1627-1634Références
Fine BS. Limiting membranes of the sensory retina and pigment epithelium : an electron microscopic study. Arch Ophthalmol 1961;66:847–860.
Lois N, Burr J, Norrie J, et al. Full-thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study (FILMS) Group. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1586–1592.
Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M. Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. A systematic review of literature and metaanalysis. Retina 2017;37:1813–1819.
Odrobina DC, Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Nawrocki J. High speed, high resolution spectral optical coherence tomography in patients after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for proliferative vitreoretinopathy retinal detachment. Retina 2010;30:881–886.
Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2279–2283.
Mitamura Y, Suzuki T, Kinoshita T, et al. Optical coherence tomographic findings of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:1155–1156.
Alkabes M, Salinas C, Vitale L, et al. En face optical coherence tomography of inner retinal defects after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:8349–8355.
Eissa MGAM, Abdelhakim MASE, Macky TA, et al. Functional and structural outcomes of ILM peeling in uncomplicated macula-off RRD using microperimetry & en-face OCT. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;256:249–257.
Tadayoni R, Svorenova I, Erginay A, et al. Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1513–1516.
Deltour JB, Grimbert P, Masse H, et al. Detrimental effects of active internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery: microperimetric analysis. Retina 2017;37:544–552.
Ahn SJ, Ahn J, Woo SJ, Park KH. Photoreceptor change and visual outcome after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal with and without additional internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 2014;34:172–181.
Imai H, Ohta K. Microperimetric determination of retinal sensitivity in areas of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer following internal limiting membrane peeling. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010;54:435–440.
Ito Y, Terasaki H, Takahashi A, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1415–1420.
Horiguchi M, Tanikawa A, Mizuguchi T, et al. The effect of an inverted internal limiting membrane flap on retinal function after macular hole surgery. Ophthalmol Retina 2017;1:421–427.
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Dulczewska-Cichecka K, et al. Temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus classic inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique a comparative study. Retina 2015;35:1844–1850.
Ozdemir H, Karacorlu M, Senturk F, et al. Retinal sensitivity and fixation changes 1 year after triamcinolone acetonide assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery–a MP-1 microperimetric study. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:e222–e227.
Leisser C, Palkovits S, Hirnschall N, et al. One-year results after internal limiting membrane flap transposition for surgical repair of macular holes with respect to microperimetry. Ophthalmic Res 2019;61:83–87.
Wrzesińska D, Nowomiejska K, Nowakowska D, et al. Vertical and horizontal M-charts and microperimetry for assessment of the visual function in patients after vitrectomy with ILM peeling due to stage 4 macular hole. J Ophthalmol 2019;2019:4975973.
Sano M, Shimoda Y, Hashimoto H, Kishi S. Restored photoreceptor outer segment and visual recovery after macular hole closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:313–318.
Mayer WJ, Fazekas C, Schumann R, et al. Functional and morphological correlations before and after video-documented 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with membrane and ILM peeling in patients with macular pucker. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:297239.
Ismail SA, Mutalib HA, Ngah NF. Macular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different ages. J Optom 2015;8:266–272.
Sabates FN, Vincent RD, Koulen P, et al. Normative data set identifying properties of the macula across age groups: integration of visual function and retinal structure with microperimetry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2011;31:1294–1302.
Pilli S, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS, Park SS. Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole. Retina 2012;32:2085.
Baba T, Kakisu M, Nizawa T, et al. Superficial foveal avascular zone determined by optical coherence tomography angiography before and after macular hole surgery. Retina 2017;37:444–450.
Faria MY, Ferreira NP, Cristóvao DM, et al. Tomographic structural changes of retinal layers after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery. Ophthalmic Res 2018;59:24–29.
Wolf S, Schnurbusch U, Wiedemann P, et al. Peeling of the basal membrane in the human retina: ultrastructural effects. Ophthalmology 2004;111:238–243.
Spaide RF. “Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance” after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina 2012;32:1719–1726.
Cicinelli MV, Marchese A, Bandello F, Coppola M. Inner retinal layer and outer retinal layer findings after macular hole surgery assessed by means of Optical Coherence Tomography. J Ophthalmol 2019;2019:3821479.