Mirizzi syndrome in a patient with partial gastrectomy with Billroth II anastomosis: A case report.
Billroth
Case report
Cholangiography
ERCP
Gastrectomy
Laparoscopy
Mirizzi syndrome
Journal
International journal of surgery case reports
ISSN: 2210-2612
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg Case Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101529872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
28
10
2020
revised:
13
11
2020
accepted:
13
11
2020
entrez:
5
1
2021
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
6
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mirizzi Syndrome (MS) is a common bile duct (CBD) obstruction caused by extrinsic compression from an impacted stone in the cystic duct or infundibulum of the gallbladder. Radiological evaluation may mistake it for CBD stones in jaundiced patient, especially in those who have altered anatomy of upper gastrointestinal (e.g. sub-total gastrectomy - STG - with Billroth I or II anastomosis). A 69-year-old male with a history of STG Billroth-II 25 years prior, accessed hospital for abdominal pain and jaundice with increasing in hepatic laboratory tests. Ultrasound of abdomen, CT scan and MRCP diagnosed CBD stones, so endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed, using a gastroscope to reach papillary region and to achieve cannulation of biliary duct. During cholangiography patient resulted affected by Mirizzi syndrome type I, so laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed and cystic duct was moved away. This rare case shows how it's easy to delay the correct treatment when a wrong radiological diagnosis is made. Moreover, ERCP remains a challenging procedure in patients with altered anatomy, such as STG B-II, and in this case gastroscope was needed for cannulation, due to the need of frontal view. This rare case report highlights the importance of not forgetting MS in the differential diagnosis of biliary obstruction, especially in those patients with upper GI altered anatomy. Physicians with expertise in ERCP should always consider altered anatomy as a factor which may confuse radiologist in diagnosis, so in this case MS may be discovered or confirmed at ERCP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33395843
pii: S2210-2612(20)31107-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.084
pmc: PMC7701885
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
549-553Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Références
Ann Surg. 1985 Mar;201(3):315-8
pubmed: 3977432
Endoscopy. 2019 Feb;51(2):E38-E39
pubmed: 30537783
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(15):e3157
pubmed: 27082555
Am J Gastroenterol. 1985 Oct;80(10):822-3
pubmed: 4036942
J Visc Surg. 2010 Aug;147(4):e217-20
pubmed: 20920904
Br J Surg. 2005 Nov;92(11):1399-403
pubmed: 16078296
Ann Surg. 1992 Jan;215(1):19-26
pubmed: 1731646
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 14;25(26):3313-3333
pubmed: 31341358
J Dig Dis. 2019 Dec;20(12):631-635
pubmed: 31577857
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jan 7;15:3
pubmed: 31921329
Br J Surg. 1989 Nov;76(11):1139-43
pubmed: 2597969
Acta Chir Scand. 1964 Jan-Feb;127:130-3
pubmed: 14104692
Am Surg. 1984 May;50(5):241-3
pubmed: 6721287
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Feb 11;21(2):7
pubmed: 30741352
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:132-136
pubmed: 30342279
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2454-2459
pubmed: 31376008
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Jun;172(6):493-6
pubmed: 2035143
Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):657-83
pubmed: 27299638
Am J Surg. 1993 Jul;166(1):6-10
pubmed: 8328630