Variability and sampling of lead (Pb) in drinking water: Assessing potential human exposure depends on the sampling protocol.
Exposure
Lead
Particulate
Sampling protocol
Spatial
Temporal
Variability
Water use
Journal
Environment international
ISSN: 1873-6750
Titre abrégé: Environ Int
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7807270
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
08
09
2020
revised:
30
10
2020
accepted:
31
10
2020
entrez:
5
1
2021
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lead (Pb) in drinking water has re-emerged as a modern public health threat which can vary widely in space and in time (i.e., between homes, within homes and even at the same tap over time). Spatial and temporal water Pb variability in buildings is the combined result of water chemistry, hydraulics, Pb plumbing materials and water use patterns. This makes it challenging to obtain meaningful water Pb data with which to estimate potential exposure to residents. The objectives of this review paper are to describe the root causes of intrinsic Pb variability in drinking water, which in turn impacts the numerous existing water sampling protocols for Pb. Such knowledge can assist the public health community, the drinking water industry, and other interested groups to interpret/compare existing drinking water Pb data, develop appropriate sampling protocols to answer specific questions relating to Pb in water, and understand potential exposure to Pb-contaminated water. Overall, review of the literature indicated that drinking water sampling for Pb assessment can serve many purposes. Regulatory compliance sampling protocols are useful in assessing community-wide compliance with a water Pb regulatory standard by typically employing practical single samples. More complex multi-sample protocols are useful for comprehensive Pb plumbing source determination (e.g., Pb service line, Pb brass faucet, Pb solder joint) or Pb form identification (i.e., particulate Pb release) in buildings. Exposure assessment sampling can employ cumulative water samples that directly capture an approximate average water Pb concentration over a prolonged period of normal household water use. Exposure assessment may conceivably also employ frequent random single samples, but this approach warrants further investigation. Each protocol has a specific use answering one or more questions relevant to Pb in water. In order to establish statistical correlations to blood Pb measurements or to predict blood Pb levels from existing datasets, the suitability of available drinking water Pb datasets in representing water Pb exposure needs to be understood and the uncertainties need to be characterized.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33395926
pii: S0160-4120(20)32214-5
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106259
pmc: PMC7879988
mid: NIHMS1664790
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drinking Water
0
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Lead
2P299V784P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106259Subventions
Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Références
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Sep 5;51(17):9507-9515
pubmed: 28791866
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 17;49(6):3746-54
pubmed: 25692317
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Aug 20;47(16):9300-7
pubmed: 23879429
Clin Chim Acta. 1979 Jul 2;95(1):129-33
pubmed: 509722
Environ Geochem Health. 1987 Dec;9(3-4):80-5
pubmed: 24214238
Hum Toxicol. 1982 Mar;1(2):115-22
pubmed: 7173892
Sci Total Environ. 1985 Mar 1;41(3):235-57
pubmed: 4035342
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 10;644:1346-1356
pubmed: 30743847
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Mar;188(3):177
pubmed: 26896965
Ambul Pediatr. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):288-92
pubmed: 17000419
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 May 17;50(10):5269-77
pubmed: 27078082
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jan 1;466-467:1011-21
pubmed: 23988746
BMJ. 1996 Oct 19;313(7063):979-81
pubmed: 8892418
Water Res. 2012 Mar 1;46(3):611-21
pubmed: 22153355
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jun 17;48(12):6836-43
pubmed: 24865841
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Aug 4;54(15):9474-9482
pubmed: 32638591
Environ Int. 2014 Dec;73:57-65
pubmed: 25087106
Sci Total Environ. 1987 Oct;66:235-44
pubmed: 3685951
Environ Monit Assess. 1990 Jul;15(1):59-82
pubmed: 24243429
Am J Public Health. 1996 Oct;86(10):1416-21
pubmed: 8876511
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Mar 1;43(5):1618-23
pubmed: 19350944
Water Res. 2012 Oct 15;46(16):5205-16
pubmed: 22863027
AWWA Water Sci. 2020 Jun 16;:e1186
pubmed: 32838226
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):185-91
pubmed: 23361441
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):283-90
pubmed: 26691115
Environ Int. 2015 Jan;74:152-9
pubmed: 25454232
Water Res. 2018 Sep 1;140:110-122
pubmed: 29704756
Water Res. 2013 May 1;47(7):2409-20
pubmed: 23481285
Am J Public Health. 1996 Oct;86(10):1460-3
pubmed: 8876521
Water Res. 2019 Mar 1;150:380-391
pubmed: 30550868
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Aug 21;52(16):9451-9459
pubmed: 30027743
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(1):739-46
pubmed: 24321041
Lancet. 1976 Jun 12;1(7972):1295
pubmed: 73718
Water Res. 2011 Apr;45(9):2763-74
pubmed: 21458838
Water Res. 2019 Jun 1;156:327-336
pubmed: 30927628
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Feb 21;51(4):2007-2014
pubmed: 28145123
Food Addit Contam. 1986 Apr-Jun;3(2):167-76
pubmed: 3709889
Water Res. 2003 Jul;37(12):2821-32
pubmed: 12767286
Food Chem Toxicol. 2000;38(1 Suppl):S73-9
pubmed: 10717374
J Am Water Works Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;109(11):E464-E478
pubmed: 32801380
Sci Total Environ. 1990 Jan;90:13-29
pubmed: 2305239
Nature. 1979 Dec 13;282(5740):712-3
pubmed: 514348
Br Med J. 1972 May 27;2(5812):491-3
pubmed: 5031207
Water Res. 2010 Jun;44(12):3734-44
pubmed: 20546838
J Water Health. 2012 Sep;10(3):337-48
pubmed: 22960478
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983 Mar;37(1):1-7
pubmed: 6875437
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004 Jul;207(3):235-44
pubmed: 15330391
Water Res. 2009 Jun;43(10):2647-56
pubmed: 19386341
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Sep 1;593-594:202-210
pubmed: 28343040
Water Res. 2019 Jun 15;157:40-54
pubmed: 30952007
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 12;125(9):097009
pubmed: 28934096
Environ Geochem Health. 1993 Dec;15(4):191-200
pubmed: 24198138