Human exposure pathways to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from indoor media: A systematic review protocol.
Exposure pathways
Human exposure
Indoor
PFAS
Systematic review
Journal
Environment international
ISSN: 1873-6750
Titre abrégé: Environ Int
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7807270
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
01
06
2020
revised:
24
11
2020
accepted:
25
11
2020
entrez:
5
1
2021
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has been primarily attributed to contaminated food and drinking water. However, additional PFAS exposure pathways have been raised by a limited number of studies reporting correlations between commercial and industrial products and PFAS levels in human media and biomonitoring. Systematic review (SR) methodologies have been widely used to evaluate similar questions using an unbiased approach in the fields of clinical medicine, epidemiology, and toxicology, but the deployment in exposure science is ongoing. Here we present a systematic review protocol that adapts existing systematic review methodologies and study evaluation tools to exposure science studies in order to investigate evidence for important PFAS exposure pathways from indoor media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, plus indoor air and dust. We will systematically review exposure science studies that present both PFAS concentrations from indoor exposure media and PFAS concentrations in blood serum or plasma. Exposure estimates will be synthesized from the evidence to answer the question, "For the general population, what effect does exposure from PFAS chemicals via indoor media have on blood, serum or plasma concentrations of PFAS?" We adapt existing systematic review methodologies and study evaluation tools from the U.S. EPA's Systematic Review Protocol for the PFBA, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFDA IRIS Assessments and the Navigation Guide for exposure science studies, as well as present innovative developments of exposure pathway-specific search strings for use in artificial intelligence screening software. We will search electronic databases for potentially relevant literature, including Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest. Literature search results will be stored in EPA's Health and Environmental Research Online (HERO) database. Included studies will present exposure measures from indoor media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, plus indoor air and dust, paired with PFAS concentrations in blood, serum or plasma from adults and/or children in the general population. We focus on a subset of PFAS chemicals including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA). Studies will be prefiltered at the title and abstract level using computationally intelligent search strings to expedite the screening process for reviewers. Two independent reviewers will screen the prefiltered studies against inclusion criteria at the title/abstract level and then full-text level, after which the reviewers will assess the studies' risk of bias using an approach modified from established systematic review tools for exposure studies. Exposure estimates will be calculated to investigate the proportion of blood, serum or plasma) PFAS concentrations that can be explained by exposure to PFAS in indoor media.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has been primarily attributed to contaminated food and drinking water. However, additional PFAS exposure pathways have been raised by a limited number of studies reporting correlations between commercial and industrial products and PFAS levels in human media and biomonitoring. Systematic review (SR) methodologies have been widely used to evaluate similar questions using an unbiased approach in the fields of clinical medicine, epidemiology, and toxicology, but the deployment in exposure science is ongoing. Here we present a systematic review protocol that adapts existing systematic review methodologies and study evaluation tools to exposure science studies in order to investigate evidence for important PFAS exposure pathways from indoor media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, plus indoor air and dust.
OBJECTIVES
We will systematically review exposure science studies that present both PFAS concentrations from indoor exposure media and PFAS concentrations in blood serum or plasma. Exposure estimates will be synthesized from the evidence to answer the question, "For the general population, what effect does exposure from PFAS chemicals via indoor media have on blood, serum or plasma concentrations of PFAS?" We adapt existing systematic review methodologies and study evaluation tools from the U.S. EPA's Systematic Review Protocol for the PFBA, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFDA IRIS Assessments and the Navigation Guide for exposure science studies, as well as present innovative developments of exposure pathway-specific search strings for use in artificial intelligence screening software.
DATA SOURCES
We will search electronic databases for potentially relevant literature, including Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest. Literature search results will be stored in EPA's Health and Environmental Research Online (HERO) database.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA
Included studies will present exposure measures from indoor media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, plus indoor air and dust, paired with PFAS concentrations in blood, serum or plasma from adults and/or children in the general population. We focus on a subset of PFAS chemicals including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA).
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Studies will be prefiltered at the title and abstract level using computationally intelligent search strings to expedite the screening process for reviewers. Two independent reviewers will screen the prefiltered studies against inclusion criteria at the title/abstract level and then full-text level, after which the reviewers will assess the studies' risk of bias using an approach modified from established systematic review tools for exposure studies. Exposure estimates will be calculated to investigate the proportion of blood, serum or plasma) PFAS concentrations that can be explained by exposure to PFAS in indoor media.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33395950
pii: S0160-4120(20)32263-7
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106308
pmc: PMC8118191
mid: NIHMS1680462
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alkanesulfonic Acids
0
Drinking Water
0
Dust
0
Environmental Pollutants
0
Fluorocarbons
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106308Subventions
Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Références
Environ Res. 2016 Jul;148:351-359
pubmed: 27111244
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jun;96(6):1747-53
pubmed: 21411548
Environ Int. 2019 May;126:54-60
pubmed: 30776750
Environ Int. 2018 Apr;113:1-9
pubmed: 29421396
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018 Apr;221(3):569-577
pubmed: 29514764
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):1479-1492
pubmed: 30213782
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 Jun;5(2):213-224
pubmed: 29737463
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):197-202
pubmed: 20123614
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197244
pubmed: 29746532
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 1;45(19):8160-6
pubmed: 21534542
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 1;45(19):8006-14
pubmed: 21517063
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 Oct;15(7):614-9
pubmed: 18763004
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;29(2):206-217
pubmed: 30622332
Chemosphere. 2014 Mar;98:78-83
pubmed: 24238303
Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:264-73
pubmed: 25460645
J Immunotoxicol. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(4):373-9
pubmed: 23350954
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 Mar;5(1):1-19
pubmed: 29556975
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104871
pubmed: 31254867
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):206-19
pubmed: 16357352
Environ Res. 2019 Oct;177:108648
pubmed: 31421451
Environ Int. 2013 Oct;60:128-36
pubmed: 24041736
Toxicol Rep. 2019 Jun 28;6:645-655
pubmed: 31334035
Environ Int. 2018 Oct;119:174-185
pubmed: 29958118
Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 21;7(1):242
pubmed: 30577874
Chemosphere. 2008 Nov;73(10):1617-24
pubmed: 18834614
Chem Biol Interact. 2001 Apr 16;134(2):203-16
pubmed: 11311214
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 15;8(1):23
pubmed: 30646959
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 19;53(4):1985-1993
pubmed: 30663877
Environ Pollut. 2019 Apr;247:1055-1063
pubmed: 30823334
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;30(6):906-916
pubmed: 32467626
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1007-14
pubmed: 24968373
Environ Pollut. 2018 Jan;232:73-79
pubmed: 28923343
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2016 Oct 11;3(10):344-350
pubmed: 27752509
Syst Rev. 2016 May 23;5:87
pubmed: 27216467
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 30;15(9):
pubmed: 30200252
Chemosphere. 2013 Aug;92(7):843-50
pubmed: 23689097
Environ Int. 2020 May;138:105623
pubmed: 32203803
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1028-39
pubmed: 24968388
Environ Int. 2010 Oct;36(7):772-8
pubmed: 20579735
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Jun;119(6):878-85
pubmed: 21233055
J Hazard Mater. 2019 Mar 5;365:26-33
pubmed: 30399487
J Immunotoxicol. 2016;13(2):173-80
pubmed: 25812627
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 15;512-513:364-370
pubmed: 25638651