Assessment of water quality in Aguieira reservoir: Ecotoxicological tools in addition to the Water Framework Directive.
Bioassays
Biomarkers
Ecological potential
Lentic ecosystem
Natural waters
Journal
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
ISSN: 1090-2414
Titre abrégé: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7805381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jan 2021
15 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
21
07
2020
revised:
21
10
2020
accepted:
27
10
2020
entrez:
5
1
2021
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
14
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the ecological potential (EP), the Water Framework Directive (WFD) uses specific parameters but ignores ecosystem functioning and individual/subindividual biological responses. The heavily modified water bodies (reservoirs) are strongly influenced by human activities that promote their imbalance, with a loss or compromise the biodiversity and the functioning of these ecosystems. This work aims to determinate the EP according physical, chemical and biological parameters of WFD and evaluate the functionality and sensitivity of ecotoxicological tools in the evaluation of water quality of Aguieira reservoir. Four sampling sites were defined in Aguieira reservoir and sampling was conducted in autumn 2018, spring and autumn 2019. WFD showed overall that Aguieira reservoir presented moderate EP. The autumn samples and the two reservoir upstream sites had the worst classification. These results were complemented by a set of ecotoxicological assays (growth inhibition of Raphidocelis subcapitata and Spirodela polyrhiza, and feeding rate of Daphnia longispina) using three natural water treatments. R. subcapitata was the most sensitive species, indicating the presence of a risk that is not detected by chemical analysis, nor by organisms of different trophic levels. D. longispina only showed sensitivity in A3 and A4 in autumn, however this results was difficult to interpret since no reason can be observed to respond the F1 lower feeding rate observed in almost sites. S. polyrhiza, as well as the total chlorophyll, lipid peroxidation, and proline content did not show sensitivity, since no discrimination among the water treatments were recorded. The relevance of bioassays is associated with the fact that an integrated response to a complex mixture can be obtained, which can contain more substances than the measured ones. Thus, we may conclude that WFD are insufficient to draw conclusions about water quality, and the growth inhibition of Raphidocelis subcapitata assay is an important parameter to complement the WFD. In addition, species of different trophic levels are recommended for ecotoxicological analyses due to differences in species sensitivities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33396106
pii: S0147-6513(20)31420-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111583
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111583Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.