Ethical principles, opportunities and constraints in clinical proteomics.

Biomarker: Diagnostic Biomarker: Prognostic Clinical data Clinical proteomics Consent Data evaluation Diagnostic Ethics Human Rights Incidental Findings Individualized medicine* Mass Spectrometry Personalized medicine Quality control and metrics Regulations

Journal

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP
ISSN: 1535-9484
Titre abrégé: Mol Cell Proteomics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101125647

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jan 2021
Historique:
accepted: 04 01 2021
received: 18 12 2020
entrez: 5 1 2021
pubmed: 6 1 2021
medline: 6 1 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Recent advances in MS-based proteomics have vastly increased the quality and scope of biological information that can be derived from human samples. These advances have rendered current workflows increasingly applicable in biomedical and clinical contexts. As proteomics is poised to take an important role in the clinic, associated ethical responsibilities increase in tandem with the impact on the health, privacy, and well-being of individuals. Here we conducted and report a systematic literature review of ethical issues in clinical proteomics. We add our perspectives from a background of bioethics, the results of our accompanying paper extracting individual-sensitive results from patient samples, and the literature addressing similar issues in genomics. The spectrum of potential issues ranges from patient re-identification to incidental findings of clinical significance. The latter can be divided into actionable and unactionable findings. Some of these have the potential to be employed in discriminatory or privacy-infringing ways. However, incidental findings may also have great positive potential. A plasma proteome profile, for instance, could inform on the general health or disease status of an individual regardless of the narrow diagnostic question that prompted it. We suggest that early discussion of ethical issues in clinical proteomics is important to ensure that eventual regulations reflect the considered judgment of the community as well as to anticipate opportunities and problems that may arise as the technology matures further.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33397710
pii: S1535-9476(21)00001-3
doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA120.002435
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Published under license by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Auteurs

Sebastian Porsdam Mann (S)

Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, Germany.

Peter V Treit (PV)

Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany.

Philipp Emanuel Geyer (PE)

Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany.

Gilbert S Omenn (GS)

Center for Computational Med. & Bioinformatic, University of Michigan, United States.

Matthias Mann (M)

Dept. Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany mmann@biochem.mpg.de.

Classifications MeSH