Does blastocyst mitochondrial DNA content affect miscarriage rate in patients undergoing single euploid frozen embryo transfer?
Abortion, Spontaneous
/ epidemiology
Adult
Aneuploidy
Blastocyst
/ cytology
DNA, Mitochondrial
/ analysis
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
Embryonic Development
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
/ methods
Humans
Middle Aged
Ploidies
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Retrospective Studies
United Arab Emirates
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
Frozen embryo transfer
Miscarriage
PGT-A
Trophectoderm biopsy
mtDNA
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2020
accepted:
10
12
2020
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
3
8
2021
entrez:
5
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine whether the blastocyst mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content is related to the miscarriage rate in patients undergoing single euploid frozen embryo transfer (SEFET). A total of 355 single euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles were studied retrospectively between April 2017 and December 2018. A trophectoderm biopsy was performed on day 5/6 blastocysts. Post next-generation sequencing (NGS), the mtDNA content was calculated as the ratio of mitochondrial DNA over nuclear DNA, and the association between blastocyst mtDNA content and miscarriage rate was evaluated. Three hundred fifty-five euploid blastocysts were selected for SEFET in 314 patients with an average age of 33.7 ± 5.6 years; 255 were biopsied on day 5 (71.8%) and 100 on day 6 (28.2%). Frozen embryo transfer (FET) was performed either in a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycle (71.8%; n = 255) or in a natural cycle (NC) (28.2%; n = 100). A pregnancy rate of 66.2% (235/355) was obtained with clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates of 52.4% (n = 186) and 5.6% (n = 20), respectively. There was no significant difference neither between the blastocyst mtDNA content of pregnant and nonpregnant patients (27.7 ± 9.2 vs. 29.4 ± 8.6, P = 0.095) nor between patients with a clinical pregnancy and miscarriage (30.5 ± 9.3 vs. 27.3 ± 9.2, P = 0.136). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the same nonsignificant relationship, except for the miscarriage rate and BMI (OR 1.149, 95% CI 1.03-1.28; P = 0.012). Mitochondrial DNA content is unable to predict the miscarriage of implanted human euploid blastocysts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33398514
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-02050-8
pii: 10.1007/s10815-020-02050-8
pmc: PMC7910391
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Mitochondrial
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
595-604Références
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-40
pubmed: 24077980
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Sep;39(3):403-412
pubmed: 31420253
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Nov;27(5):530-8
pubmed: 23933035
Cells. 2019 Aug 08;8(8):
pubmed: 31398797
J Ovarian Res. 2017 Oct 16;10(1):70
pubmed: 29037231
Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3047-50
pubmed: 17956925
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Sep;36(9):1855-1865
pubmed: 31456110
Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):365-77
pubmed: 17548368
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):116-33
pubmed: 26386469
Bioessays. 2002 Sep;24(9):845-9
pubmed: 12210521
Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2340-2347
pubmed: 29040520
Hum Reprod. 2001 Dec;16(12):2606-9
pubmed: 11726582
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan;109(1):110-117
pubmed: 29307391
Fertil Steril. 2018 Mar;109(3):429-436
pubmed: 29566854
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000 Jan;79(1):43-8
pubmed: 10646815
Hum Reprod. 1993 Jul;8(7):1061-6
pubmed: 8408487
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jun;37(6):1387-1397
pubmed: 32372301
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):393-406
pubmed: 28760517
PLoS Genet. 2015 Jun 03;11(6):e1005241
pubmed: 26039092
Theriogenology. 2007 Jan 1;67(1):73-80
pubmed: 17055564
Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep;104(3):534-41.e1
pubmed: 26051102
Fertil Steril. 1999 Oct;72(4):604-9
pubmed: 10521095
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):954-962
pubmed: 28333210
Mol Hum Reprod. 2008 Dec;14(12):703-10
pubmed: 18957518
Toxicology. 2003 Apr 1;185(3):179-84
pubmed: 12581692
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1282-1292
pubmed: 28387858
Hum Reprod. 2008 Apr;23(4):878-84
pubmed: 18281684
Mol Hum Reprod. 2008 Dec;14(12):667-72
pubmed: 19019836
BMJ. 2010 Dec 21;341:c6945
pubmed: 21177530
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Jan;104(1):53-5
pubmed: 18957271
Mol Reprod Dev. 2016 Sep;83(9):748-754
pubmed: 27465801
Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2802-13
pubmed: 25336713
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Dec 20;2018(4):hoy023
pubmed: 30895263
J Med Genet. 2014 Aug;51(8):553-62
pubmed: 25031024
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 May;35(5):871-877
pubmed: 29508122
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Sep;36(9):1847-1854
pubmed: 31292817
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;(10):CD008046
pubmed: 25358904
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Aug;41(2):183-190
pubmed: 32600944
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):34-42.e3
pubmed: 27793366