Endoscopic and percutaneous biliary interventions in patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy-the Munich Multicenter Experience.
Biliary disease
Cholestasis
ERCP
Enteroscopy-assisted
PTBD
Surgically altered anatomy
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
12
05
2020
accepted:
17
11
2020
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
6
1
2022
entrez:
5
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy, conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is often not possible and different techniques, like enteroscopy-assisted or percutaneous approaches are required. Aim of this study was to analyze success and complication rates of these techniques in a large collective of patients in the daily clinical practice in a pre-endosonographic biliary drainage era. Patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy with biliary interventions between March 1st, 2006, and June 30th, 2014 in four tertiary endoscopic centers in Munich, Germany were retrospectively analyzed. At least one endoscopic-assisted biliary intervention was successful in 234/411 patients (56.9%)-in 192 patients in the first, in 34 patients in the second and in 8 patients in the third attempt. Success rates for Billroth-II/Whipple-/Roux-en-Y reconstruction were 70.5%/56.7%/49.5%. Complication rates for these reconstructions were 9.3%/6.5%/6.3%, the overall complication rate was 7.1%. Success rates were highest in patients with Billroth-II reconstruction where use of a duodenoscope was possible, complication rates were also highest in this scenario. Success rates were lowest in longer-limb anatomy like Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Percutaneous biliary drainages (PTBD) were inserted 268 times with substantially higher success (90.7%) as well as complication rates (11.6%) compared to the endoscopic approach. Compared to patients treated endoscopically, patients with PTBD had a lower performance status, more severe cholestasis and a significant higher rate of malignant underlying disease. In patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy, success rates of endoscopic-assisted biliary interventions are lower compared to PTBD. Still, due to the beneficial complication rates of the endoscopic approach, this technique should be preferred whenever possible and in selected patients who still need to be defined in detail, repeated endoscopic attempts are useful to help achieve the desired result.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy, conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is often not possible and different techniques, like enteroscopy-assisted or percutaneous approaches are required. Aim of this study was to analyze success and complication rates of these techniques in a large collective of patients in the daily clinical practice in a pre-endosonographic biliary drainage era.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy with biliary interventions between March 1st, 2006, and June 30th, 2014 in four tertiary endoscopic centers in Munich, Germany were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS
At least one endoscopic-assisted biliary intervention was successful in 234/411 patients (56.9%)-in 192 patients in the first, in 34 patients in the second and in 8 patients in the third attempt. Success rates for Billroth-II/Whipple-/Roux-en-Y reconstruction were 70.5%/56.7%/49.5%. Complication rates for these reconstructions were 9.3%/6.5%/6.3%, the overall complication rate was 7.1%. Success rates were highest in patients with Billroth-II reconstruction where use of a duodenoscope was possible, complication rates were also highest in this scenario. Success rates were lowest in longer-limb anatomy like Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Percutaneous biliary drainages (PTBD) were inserted 268 times with substantially higher success (90.7%) as well as complication rates (11.6%) compared to the endoscopic approach. Compared to patients treated endoscopically, patients with PTBD had a lower performance status, more severe cholestasis and a significant higher rate of malignant underlying disease.
CONCLUSION
In patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy, success rates of endoscopic-assisted biliary interventions are lower compared to PTBD. Still, due to the beneficial complication rates of the endoscopic approach, this technique should be preferred whenever possible and in selected patients who still need to be defined in detail, repeated endoscopic attempts are useful to help achieve the desired result.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33398586
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08191-2
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-08191-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6853-6864Informations de copyright
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS, Blero D, Mangiavillano B, Schmidt A, Vanbiervliet G, Costamagna G, Deviere J, Garcia-Cano J, Gyokeres T, Hassan C, Prat F, Siersema PD, van Hooft JE (2018) Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline—Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 50:910–930
pubmed: 30086596
Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czako L, Gyokeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD (2018) Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United Eur Gastroenterol J 6:1448–1460
Park TY, Song TJ (2019) Recent advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Billroth II gastrectomy patients: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 25:3091–3107
pubmed: 31293344
pmcid: 6603814
Krutsri C, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Iwai T, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W (2019) Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy. World J Gastroenterol 25:3313–3333
pubmed: 31341358
pmcid: 6639547
Inamdar S, Slattery E, Sejpal DV, Miller LS, Pleskow DK, Berzin TM, Trindade AJ (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 82:9–19
pubmed: 25922248
Gomez V, Petersen BT (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in surgically altered anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 25:631–656
pubmed: 26431595
Amer S, Horsley-Silva JL, Menias CO, Pannala R (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Abdom Imaging 40:2921–2931
pubmed: 26304586
Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Matsushita M, Okazaki K (2014) Endoscopic approaches for pancreatobiliary diseases in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig Endosc 26(Suppl 1):70–78
pubmed: 24118126
Glenn F, Evans JA, Mujahed Z, Thorbjarnarson B (1962) Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Ann Surg 156:451–462
pubmed: 13899198
pmcid: 1466212
Winick AB, Waybill PN, Venbrux AC (2001) Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 4:200–206
pubmed: 11748558
Wright BE, Cass OW, Freeman ML (2001) ERCP in patients with long-limb Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and intact papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 56:225–232
Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Iino S, Ido K, Sugano K (2001) Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 53:216–220
pubmed: 11174299
Haber GB (2007) Double balloon endoscopy for pancreatic and biliary access in altered anatomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 66:S47-50
pubmed: 17709030
Giovannini M, Dotti M, Bories E, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Danisi C, Delpero JR (2003) Hepaticogastrostomy by echo-endoscopy as a palliative treatment in a patient with metastatic biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 35:1076–1078
pubmed: 14648424
Nennstiel S, Treiber M, Faber A, Haller B, von Delius S, Schmid RM, Neu B (2019) Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Dig Dis (Basel, Switzerland) 37:77–86
Nennstiel S, Weber A, Frick G, Haller B, Meining A, Schmid RM, Neu B (2015) Drainage-related complications in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: an analysis over 10 years. J Clin Gastroenterol 49:764–770
pubmed: 25518004
Delegates AHo (2014) ASA physical status classificationsystem
Kawamura T, Uno K, Tanaka K, Yasuda K (2015) Current status of single-balloon enteroscopy: insertability and clinical applications. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:59–65
pubmed: 25610535
pmcid: 4295182
Raithel M, Dormann H, Naegel A, Boxberger F, Hahn EG, Neurath MF, Maiss J (2011) Double-balloon-enteroscopy-based endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-surgical patients. World J Gastroenterol 17:2302–2314
pubmed: 21633596
pmcid: 3098398
Weber A, Gaa J, Rosca B, Born P, Neu B, Schmid RM, Prinz C (2009) Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with dilated and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Eur J Radiol 72:412–417
pubmed: 18926655
Mayumi T, Someya K, Ootubo H, Takama T, Kido T, Kamezaki F, Yoshida M, Takada T (2013) Progression of Tokyo Guidelines and Japanese Guidelines for management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J uoeh 35:249–257
pubmed: 24334691
Oh HC, Lee SK, Lee TY, Kwon S, Lee SS, Seo DW, Kim MH (2007) Analysis of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy-related complications and the risk factors for those complications. Endoscopy 39:731–736
pubmed: 17661249
Ruxton GD (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 17:688–690
Rees J, Mytton J, Evison F, Mangat KS, Patel P, Trudgill N (2020) The outcomes of biliary drainage by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography for the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction in England between 2001 and 2014: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 10:e033576
pubmed: 31980509
pmcid: 7045186
Castiglione D, Gozzo C, Mammino L, Failla G, Palmucci S, Basile A (2019) Health-Related Quality of Life evaluation in “left” versus “right” access for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage using EORTC QLQBIL-21 questionnaire: a randomized controlled trial. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02136-7
doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02136-7
Wang F, Xu B, Li Q, Zhang X, Jiang G, Ge X, Nie J, Zhang X, Wu P, Ji J, Miao L (2016) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: one single center’s experience. Medicine 95:e5743
pubmed: 28033284
pmcid: 5207580
Faylona JM, Qadir A, Chan AC, Lau JY, Chung SC (1999) Small-bowel perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Endoscopy 31:546–549
pubmed: 10533739
Bove V, Tringali A, Familiari P, Gigante G, Boskoski I, Perri V, Mutignani M, Costamagna G (2015) ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy: report of 30 years’ experience. Endoscopy 47:611–616
pubmed: 25730282
Wu WG, Mei JW, Zhao MN, Zhang WJ, Gu J, Tao YJ, Liu YB, Wang XF (2016) Use of the conventional side-viewing duodenoscope for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in postgastrectomy patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 50:244–251
pubmed: 26535481
pmcid: 4741407
Chahal P, Baron TH, Topazian MD, Petersen BT, Levy MJ, Gostout CJ (2006) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-Whipple patients. Endoscopy 38:1241–1245
pubmed: 17163326
Feitoza AB, Baron TH (2001) Endoscopy and ERCP in the setting of previous upper GI tract surgery. Part I: reconstruction without alteration of pancreaticobiliary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 54:743–749
pubmed: 11726851
Schreiner MA, Chang L, Gluck M, Irani S, Gan SI, Brandabur JJ, Thirlby R, Moonka R, Kozarek RA, Ross AS (2012) Laparoscopy-assisted versus balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in bariatric post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Gastrointest Endosc 75:748–756
pubmed: 22301340
Emmett DS, Mallat DB (2007) Double-balloon ERCP in patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y surgery: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1038–1041
pubmed: 17963892
Itokawa F, Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, Moriyasu F (2014) Single- and double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y plus hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis and Whipple resection. Dig Endosc 26(Suppl 2):136–143
pubmed: 24750164
Monkemuller K, Fry LC, Bellutti M, Neumann H, Malfertheiner P (2009) ERCP with the double balloon enteroscope in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 23:1961–1967
pubmed: 19067052
Moreels TG, Pelckmans PA (2010) Comparison between double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscopy in therapeutic ERC after Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2:314–317
pubmed: 21160763
pmcid: 2999030
Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S, Cengiz C, Yurdakul M, Akdogan M, Kilic MZ, Sasmaz N, Cumhur T, Sahin B (2010) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography by double balloon enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 24:466–470
pubmed: 19585072
Pohl J, May A, Aschmoneit I, Ell C (2009) Double-balloon endoscopy for retrograde cholangiography in patients with choledochojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Z Gastroenterol 47:215–219
pubmed: 19197824
Shah RJ, Smolkin M, Yen R, Ross A, Kozarek RA, Howell DA, Bakis G, Jonnalagadda SS, Al-Lehibi AA, Hardy A, Morgan DR, Sethi A, Stevens PD, Akerman PA, Thakkar SJ, Brauer BC (2013) A multicenter, U.S. experience of single-balloon, double-balloon, and rotational overtube-assisted enteroscopy ERCP in patients with surgically altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 77:593–600
pubmed: 23290720
Tsou YK, Lee MS, Chen KF, Lin CH, Sung KF, Wu CC (2016) Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for Roux-en-Y reconstruction patients with papilla of Vater or bilioenteric anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 51:95–102
pubmed: 26067876
Skinner M, Popa D, Neumann H, Wilcox CM, Monkemuller K (2014) ERCP with the overtube-assisted enteroscopy technique: a systematic review. Endoscopy 46:560–572
pubmed: 24839188
Siddiqui AA, Chaaya A, Shelton C, Marmion J, Kowalski TE, Loren DE, Heller SJ, Haluszka O, Adler DG, Tokar JL (2013) Utility of the short double-balloon enteroscope to perform pancreaticobiliary interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy in a US multicenter study. Dig Dis Sci 58:858–864
pubmed: 22975796
Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tsuchiya T, Kurihara T, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Fukuzawa K, Moriyasu F, Tsuchida A (2014) Long- and short-type double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted therapeutic ERCP for intact papilla in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 25:713–721
Iwai T, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W (2014) Short-type and conventional single-balloon enteroscopes for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: single-center experience. Dig Endosc 26(Suppl 2):156–163
pubmed: 24750167
Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH, Khan S, Kocak M, Alastal Y, Hammad T, Lee WM, Sofi A, Artifon EL, Nawras A, Ismail MK (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 61:684–703
pubmed: 26518417
Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Lisotti A, Cennamo V, Virgilio C, Caletti G, Fusaroli P (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based–a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 20:8424–8448
pubmed: 25024600
pmcid: 4093695
Wang K, Zhu J, Xing L, Wang Y, Jin Z, Li Z (2016) Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 83:1218–1227
pubmed: 26542374
Moole H, Bechtold ML, Forcione D, Puli SR (2017) A meta-analysis and systematic review: Success of endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary stenting in patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures and a failed ERCP. Medicine 96:e5154
pubmed: 28099327
pmcid: 5279072
Katanuma A, Hayashi T, Kin T, Toyonaga H, Honta S, Chikugo K, Ueki H, Ishii T, Takahashi K (2020) Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: techniques and literature review. Dig Endosc 32:263–274
pubmed: 31643105
Jovani M, Ichkhanian Y, Vosoughi K, Khashab MA (2019) EUS-guided biliary drainage for postsurgical anatomy. Endosc Ultrasound 8:S57-s66
pubmed: 31897381
pmcid: 6896432
Khashab MA, El Zein MH, Sharzehi K, Marson FP, Haluszka O, Small AJ, Nakai Y, Park DH, Kunda R, Teoh AY, Penas I, Perez-Miranda M, Kumbhari V, Van der Merwe S, Artifon EL, Ross AS (2016) EUS-guided biliary drainage or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgical anatomy and biliary obstruction: an international comparative study. Endosc Int Open 4:E1322-e1327
pubmed: 27995197
pmcid: 5161123
Sportes A, Camus M, Greget M, Leblanc S, Coriat R, Hochberger J, Chaussade S, Grabar S, Prat F (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective expertise-based study from two centers. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 10:483–493
pubmed: 28567118
pmcid: 5424875
Neuhaus H, Beyna T, Schneider M, Deviere J (2016) Novel motorized spiral enteroscopy: first clinical case. VideoGIE 1:32–33
pubmed: 29905207
pmcid: 5989127
Moreels TG (2012) Altered anatomy: enteroscopy and ERCP procedure. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 26:347–357
pubmed: 22704576