Guideline of the guidelines: urolithiasis.
Journal
Current opinion in urology
ISSN: 1473-6586
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
6
1
2021
medline:
26
5
2021
entrez:
5
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We reviewed the latest guidelines on urolithiasis to highlight the commonalities and differences in the most important recommendations. Most guidelines utilize systematic review of literature and grade evidence to generate the appropriate recommendations and statements. Only the latest versions of guidelines were included in this review. Four national and international guidelines were included in this review, including those of the EAU (European Association of Urology), the AUA (American Urological Association)/ES (Endourological Society), the UAA (Urological Association of Asia) and the NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guidelines. There are general similarities in the most important recommendations. The EAU guidelines provide the latest evidence updates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33399368
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000855
pii: 00042307-202103000-00011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
125-129Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR. Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 2005; 68:1808–1814.
Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis: an update. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2008; 5:101–106.
Faraday M, Hubbard H, Kosiak B, Dmochowski R. Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the recommendations of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2009; 104:294–297.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336:924–926.
NICE Guideline - Renal and ureteric stones: assessment and management. BJU Int 2019; 123:220–232.
Taguchi K, Cho SY, Ng AC, et al. The Urological Association of Asia clinical guideline for urinary stone disease. Int J Urol 2019; 26:688–709.
C. Türk AN, A. Petrik, C. Seitz, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. 2020.
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol 2016; 196:1153–1160.
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence.
Musa AA. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40:19–22.
Shen P, Jiang M, Yang J, et al. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2011; 186:1328–1335.
Wang H, Man L, Li G, et al. Meta-analysis of stenting versus non-stenting for the treatment of ureteral stones. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0167670.
Murad MH. Clinical practice guidelines: a primer on development and dissemination. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92:423–433.
Shekelle PG. Clinical practice guidelines: what's next? JAMA 2018; 320:757–758.
Zumstein V, Betschart P, Abt D, et al. Surgical management of urolithiasis – a systematic analysis of available guidelines. BMC Urology 2018; 18:25.
Pradère B, Doizi S, Proietti S, et al. Evaluation of guidelines for surgical management of urolithiasis. J Urol 2018; 199:1267–1271.
Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ 2010; 182:E839–E842.
Vernooij RWM, Sanabria AJ, Solà I, et al. Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks. Implement Sci 2014; 9:3.