Setting global research priorities for private sector child health service delivery: Results from a CHNRI exercise.


Journal

Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez: 6 1 2021
pubmed: 7 1 2021
medline: 4 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The private health sector is an important source of sick child care, yet evidence gaps persist in best practices for integrated management of private sector child health services. Further, there is no prioritized research agenda to address these gaps. We used a Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) process to identify priority research questions in response to these evidence gaps. CHNRI is a consultative approach that entails prioritizing research questions by evaluating them against standardized criteria. We engaged geographically and occupationally diverse experts in the private health sector and child health. Eighty-nine experts agreed to participate and provided 150 priority research questions. We consolidated submitted questions to reduce duplication into a final list of 50. We asked participants to complete an online survey to rank each question against 11 pre-determined criteria in four categories: (i) answerability, (ii) research feasibility, (iii) sustainability/equity, and (iv) importance/potential impact. Statistical data analysis was conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary NC, USA). We weighted all 11 evaluation criteria equally to calculate the research priority score and average expert agreement for each question. We disaggregated results by location in high-income vs low- and middle-income countries. Forty-nine participants (55.1%) completed the online survey, including 33 high-income and 16 low- and middle-income country respondents. The top, prioritized research question asks whether accreditation or regulation of private clinical and non-clinical sources of care would improve integrated management of childhood illness services. Four of the top ten research priorities were related to adherence to case management protocols. Other top research priorities were related to training and supportive supervision, digital health, and infant and newborn care. Research priorities among high-income and low- and middle-income country respondents were highly correlated. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic exercise conducted to define research priorities for the management of childhood illness in the private sector. The research priorities put forth in this CHNRI exercise aim to stimulate interest from policy makers, program managers, researchers, and donors to respond to and help close evidence gaps hindering the acceleration of reductions in child mortality through private sector approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The private health sector is an important source of sick child care, yet evidence gaps persist in best practices for integrated management of private sector child health services. Further, there is no prioritized research agenda to address these gaps. We used a Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) process to identify priority research questions in response to these evidence gaps. CHNRI is a consultative approach that entails prioritizing research questions by evaluating them against standardized criteria.
METHODS METHODS
We engaged geographically and occupationally diverse experts in the private health sector and child health. Eighty-nine experts agreed to participate and provided 150 priority research questions. We consolidated submitted questions to reduce duplication into a final list of 50. We asked participants to complete an online survey to rank each question against 11 pre-determined criteria in four categories: (i) answerability, (ii) research feasibility, (iii) sustainability/equity, and (iv) importance/potential impact. Statistical data analysis was conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary NC, USA). We weighted all 11 evaluation criteria equally to calculate the research priority score and average expert agreement for each question. We disaggregated results by location in high-income vs low- and middle-income countries.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-nine participants (55.1%) completed the online survey, including 33 high-income and 16 low- and middle-income country respondents. The top, prioritized research question asks whether accreditation or regulation of private clinical and non-clinical sources of care would improve integrated management of childhood illness services. Four of the top ten research priorities were related to adherence to case management protocols. Other top research priorities were related to training and supportive supervision, digital health, and infant and newborn care. Research priorities among high-income and low- and middle-income country respondents were highly correlated.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic exercise conducted to define research priorities for the management of childhood illness in the private sector. The research priorities put forth in this CHNRI exercise aim to stimulate interest from policy makers, program managers, researchers, and donors to respond to and help close evidence gaps hindering the acceleration of reductions in child mortality through private sector approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33403107
doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.021201
pii: jogh-10-021201
pmc: PMC7750021
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

021201

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: All authors completed an ICMJE conflicts of interest form, available upon request from the corresponding author. JZ, DH, CC, SB, TS, and AW disclose grants from USAID during the conduct of the study. MB discloses that resources from USAID sponsored the study and that she works for USAID though received no compensation specifically related to this piece of work. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Références

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 04;11(2):e0148586
pubmed: 26845546
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Aug 15;78 Suppl 1:S3-S9
pubmed: 29994913
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 19;4(6):e001643
pubmed: 31803507
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020413
pubmed: 25520803
Croat Med J. 2007 Oct;48(5):595-604
pubmed: 17948946
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010503
pubmed: 27350874
J Health Popul Nutr. 2011 Jun;29(3):255-64
pubmed: 21766561
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0202570
pubmed: 30133538
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010501
pubmed: 27418959
J Glob Health. 2013 Jun;3(1):010302
pubmed: 23826502
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):011004
pubmed: 28685049
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Oct 2;8(3):518-533
pubmed: 33008861
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010101
pubmed: 26955468
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010507
pubmed: 26401271
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020414
pubmed: 25520804
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Jan;7(1):56-61
pubmed: 17182344

Auteurs

Catherine Clarence (C)

Abt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Tess Shiras (T)

Abt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Jack Zhu (J)

Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Malia K Boggs (MK)

United States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition, Washington, D.C., USA.

Nefra Faltas (N)

United States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition, Washington, D.C., USA.

Anna Wadsworth (A)

Abt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Sarah Ek Bradley (SE)

Abt Associates, International Development Division, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Salim Sadruddin (S)

Save the Children, Washington, D.C., USA.

Kerri Wazny (K)

Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Catherine Goodman (C)

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Phyllis Awor (P)

Makerere University College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, Makerere, Uganda.

Zulfiqar A Bhutta (ZA)

Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Institute for Global Health & Development, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Karin Källander (K)

Implementation Research & Delivery Science Unit, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Davidson H Hamer (DH)

Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH