Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search.
Journal
Journal of chemical theory and computation
ISSN: 1549-9626
Titre abrégé: J Chem Theory Comput
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101232704
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Feb 2021
09 Feb 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
7
1
2021
medline:
7
1
2021
entrez:
6
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
AutoDock4 is a widely used program for docking small molecules to macromolecular targets. It describes ligand-receptor interactions using a physics-inspired scoring function that has been proven useful in a variety of drug discovery projects. However, compared to more modern and recent software, AutoDock4 has longer execution times, limiting its applicability to large scale dockings. To address this problem, we describe an OpenCL implementation of AutoDock4, called AutoDock-GPU, that leverages the highly parallel architecture of GPU hardware to reduce docking runtime by up to 350-fold with respect to a single-threaded process. Moreover, we introduce the gradient-based local search method ADADELTA, as well as an improved version of the Solis-Wets random optimizer from AutoDock4. These efficient local search algorithms significantly reduce the number of calls to the scoring function that are needed to produce good results. The improvements reported here, both in terms of docking throughput and search efficiency, facilitate the use of the AutoDock4 scoring function in large scale virtual screening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33403848
doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01006
pmc: PMC8063785
mid: NIHMS1679349
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1060-1073Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM069832
Pays : United States
Références
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Feb;16(2):113-27
pubmed: 12188021
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Oct 27;97(17):170201
pubmed: 17155444
Nature. 2016 Jun 15;534(7608):570-4
pubmed: 27309814
J Med Chem. 2007 Feb 22;50(4):726-41
pubmed: 17300160
J Comput Chem. 2010 Jan 30;31(2):455-61
pubmed: 19499576
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012 May;33(5):268-72
pubmed: 22503476
J Cheminform. 2011 Oct 07;3:33
pubmed: 21982300
Biopolymers. 2003 Jan;68(1):47-62
pubmed: 12579579
J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Feb 1;128(4):1233-9
pubmed: 16433540
Bioinformatics. 2019 Oct 1;35(19):3836-3838
pubmed: 30825370
J Comput Chem. 2018 Jul 15;39(19):1354-1358
pubmed: 29532496
Protein Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):295-301
pubmed: 26103917
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2019 Dec;33(12):1011-1020
pubmed: 31691919
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Aug 25;54(8):2371-9
pubmed: 24931227
BMC Struct Biol. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S11
pubmed: 24564952
J Med Chem. 2012 Jan 26;55(2):623-38
pubmed: 22148468
Drug Discov Today. 2006 Jul;11(13-14):607-15
pubmed: 16793529
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2016 Apr;87(4):618-25
pubmed: 26643167
Proteins. 2006 Oct 1;65(1):15-26
pubmed: 16862531
Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(18):2296-314
pubmed: 23531220
J Comput Chem. 2007 Apr 30;28(6):1145-52
pubmed: 17274016
J Comput Chem. 2009 Dec;30(16):2785-91
pubmed: 19399780
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
Nat Protoc. 2016 May;11(5):905-19
pubmed: 27077332
Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):862-5
pubmed: 15602552
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7743):224-229
pubmed: 30728502
High Perform Comput (2016). 2016 Jun;9945:188-206
pubmed: 29202130
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Jan 27;60(1):204-211
pubmed: 31887035
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Dec 02;11(12):e1004586
pubmed: 26629955
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Jul-Aug;47(4):1481-92
pubmed: 17585754
J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Jan-Feb;45(1):177-82
pubmed: 15667143
J Mol Biol. 2016 Jun 5;428(11):2430-2445
pubmed: 27091468
ACS Chem Biol. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):2209-18
pubmed: 26214585
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1717-36
pubmed: 24708446
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2019 Dec;33(12):1071-1081
pubmed: 31691920
Proteins. 1990;8(3):195-202
pubmed: 2281083
J Cheminform. 2009 Sep 11;1:15
pubmed: 20150996
Molecules. 2013 Mar 25;18(4):3760-78
pubmed: 23529035