Testing the feasibility of a sustainable preschool obesity prevention approach: a mixed-methods service evaluation of a volunteer-led HENRY programme.
Behaviour change
HENRY
Healthy eating
Mixed-methods
Parent-focused
Preschool obesity prevention
Volunteers
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 01 2021
06 01 2021
Historique:
received:
08
10
2019
accepted:
09
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over the last 10 years HENRY has been working to reduce and prevent child obesity by training health and early years professionals to deliver its evidence-based programme to parents. The aim and unique contribution of this study was to evaluate whether training volunteers to deliver this programme on a one-to-one basis was feasible. Mixed-methods service evaluation with parent-reported pre- and post-programme outcomes and focus groups conducted with parents and volunteer facilitators. The programme consisted of 8 one-to-one sessions delivered weekly by volunteers (n = 18) to build food and activity-related knowledge, skills, and understanding, and improve parenting efficacy, and parent and child eating and physical activity. Programmes took place at parent's (n = 69) home or local community venues in four London boroughs, United Kingdom. Parent-reported parenting efficacy, emotional wellbeing, eating, and physical activity data were captured, alongside parent ratings of the programme and volunteer ratings of the training. Parent and volunteer focus groups explored involvement, expectations, and experiences of the programme, training and delivery, feedback, and impact. Parents were mostly female, had varied ethnic backgrounds, and were often not working but well educated. There were statistically significant improvements of a medium-to-large size in parent and child emotional wellbeing, parenting efficacy, fruit and vegetable consumption, family eating and food purchasing behaviours. Parent ratings of the programme were positive and qualitative data highlighted the holistic nature of the programme, which focused on more than just food, and the relationships with volunteers as key facets. Volunteers were also mostly female, had varied ethnic backgrounds, and were often well educated, but more likely to be employed than parents. Volunteers rated the training and delivery as useful in enabling them to deliver the programme confidently and for their own wellbeing. Despite finding some sessions challenging emotionally, volunteers reported positive family lifestyle improvements by parents and children and that the experience would be useful for future employment. It is feasible to recruit and train volunteers to deliver a structured preschool obesity prevention programme, which parents considered acceptable and enjoyable, with preliminary reports of parent and child benefits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Over the last 10 years HENRY has been working to reduce and prevent child obesity by training health and early years professionals to deliver its evidence-based programme to parents. The aim and unique contribution of this study was to evaluate whether training volunteers to deliver this programme on a one-to-one basis was feasible.
METHODS
Mixed-methods service evaluation with parent-reported pre- and post-programme outcomes and focus groups conducted with parents and volunteer facilitators. The programme consisted of 8 one-to-one sessions delivered weekly by volunteers (n = 18) to build food and activity-related knowledge, skills, and understanding, and improve parenting efficacy, and parent and child eating and physical activity. Programmes took place at parent's (n = 69) home or local community venues in four London boroughs, United Kingdom. Parent-reported parenting efficacy, emotional wellbeing, eating, and physical activity data were captured, alongside parent ratings of the programme and volunteer ratings of the training. Parent and volunteer focus groups explored involvement, expectations, and experiences of the programme, training and delivery, feedback, and impact.
RESULTS
Parents were mostly female, had varied ethnic backgrounds, and were often not working but well educated. There were statistically significant improvements of a medium-to-large size in parent and child emotional wellbeing, parenting efficacy, fruit and vegetable consumption, family eating and food purchasing behaviours. Parent ratings of the programme were positive and qualitative data highlighted the holistic nature of the programme, which focused on more than just food, and the relationships with volunteers as key facets. Volunteers were also mostly female, had varied ethnic backgrounds, and were often well educated, but more likely to be employed than parents. Volunteers rated the training and delivery as useful in enabling them to deliver the programme confidently and for their own wellbeing. Despite finding some sessions challenging emotionally, volunteers reported positive family lifestyle improvements by parents and children and that the experience would be useful for future employment.
CONCLUSIONS
It is feasible to recruit and train volunteers to deliver a structured preschool obesity prevention programme, which parents considered acceptable and enjoyable, with preliminary reports of parent and child benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407291
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10031-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-10031-w
pmc: PMC7789777
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
46Subventions
Organisme : Health and Social Care Volunteering Fund
ID : 2013/National/055
Références
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Nov;45(6):850-860
pubmed: 31209923
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 23;13:773
pubmed: 23968220
Community Pract. 2013 Jul;86(7):23-7
pubmed: 23914474
Lancet. 2007 Jun 23;369(9579):2121-31
pubmed: 17586307
CMAJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):E23-33
pubmed: 25844367
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Oct;52(10):771-7
pubmed: 9805227
J Child Health Care. 2006 Dec;10(4):296-308
pubmed: 17101622
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Nov;30(9):1207-27
pubmed: 25500559
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 01;14:779
pubmed: 25084804
Qual Life Res. 2000;9(8):961-72
pubmed: 11284215
Pediatr Obes. 2019 Sep;14(9):e12529
pubmed: 31022330
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
Child Obes. 2020 Jan;16(1):3-19
pubmed: 31479311
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Apr;90(4):351-8
pubmed: 15781921
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Oct;25(5):460-8
pubmed: 22489933
Am J Community Psychol. 2009 Sep;44(1-2):28-42
pubmed: 19533327
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Aug 19;20:e74
pubmed: 31424376
Pediatr Obes. 2014 Oct;9(5):339-50
pubmed: 23818487
Public Health. 2016 Jul;136:101-8
pubmed: 27184820
Pediatr Obes. 2019 Aug;14(8):e12517
pubmed: 30816024
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 13;13:847
pubmed: 24034792
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 27;14:1009
pubmed: 25260375
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95 Suppl:S37-S52
pubmed: 27693295
Obes Rev. 2010 May;11(5):338-53
pubmed: 19780989
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 May;36(3):396-403
pubmed: 20337642
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Nov;36(6):850-7
pubmed: 20637028
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004015
pubmed: 20238326