Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner.
Adenosine
/ administration & dosage
Adult
Aged
Ammonia
Coronary Circulation
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging
Myocardial Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Nitrogen Radioisotopes
Positron-Emission Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Spleen
/ blood supply
Vasodilator Agents
/ administration & dosage
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Splenic switch-off
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
ISSN: 1532-429X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 01 2021
07 01 2021
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
accepted:
09
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
17
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Inadequate coronary adenosine response is a potential cause for false negative ischemia testing. Recently, the splenic switch-off (SSO) sign has been identified as a promising tool to ascertain the efficacy of adenosine during vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We assessed the value of SSO to predict adenosine response, defined as an increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during quantitative stress myocardial perfusion 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET). We prospectively enrolled 64 patients who underwent simultaneous CMR and PET myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner with co-injection of gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) and 13N-ammonia during rest and adenosine-induced stress. A myocardial flow reserve (MFR) of > 1.5 or ischemia as assessed by PET were defined as markers for adequate coronary adenosine response. The presence or absence of SSO was visually assessed. The stress-to-rest intensity ratio (SIR) was calculated as the ratio of stress over rest peak signal intensity for splenic tissue. Additionally, the spleen-to-myocardium ratio, defined as the relative change of spleen to myocardial signal, was calculated for stress (SMR Sixty-one (95%) patients were coronary adenosine responders, but SSO was absent in 18 (28%) patients. SIR and SMR The presence of SSO implies adequate coronary adenosine-induced MBF response. Its absence, however, is not a reliable indicator for failed adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Inadequate coronary adenosine response is a potential cause for false negative ischemia testing. Recently, the splenic switch-off (SSO) sign has been identified as a promising tool to ascertain the efficacy of adenosine during vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We assessed the value of SSO to predict adenosine response, defined as an increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during quantitative stress myocardial perfusion 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET).
METHODS
We prospectively enrolled 64 patients who underwent simultaneous CMR and PET myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner with co-injection of gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) and 13N-ammonia during rest and adenosine-induced stress. A myocardial flow reserve (MFR) of > 1.5 or ischemia as assessed by PET were defined as markers for adequate coronary adenosine response. The presence or absence of SSO was visually assessed. The stress-to-rest intensity ratio (SIR) was calculated as the ratio of stress over rest peak signal intensity for splenic tissue. Additionally, the spleen-to-myocardium ratio, defined as the relative change of spleen to myocardial signal, was calculated for stress (SMR
RESULTS
Sixty-one (95%) patients were coronary adenosine responders, but SSO was absent in 18 (28%) patients. SIR and SMR
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of SSO implies adequate coronary adenosine-induced MBF response. Its absence, however, is not a reliable indicator for failed adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407586
doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y
pii: 10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y
pmc: PMC7789581
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nitrogen Radioisotopes
0
Vasodilator Agents
0
Ammonia
7664-41-7
Adenosine
K72T3FS567
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3Références
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):453-60
pubmed: 22196944
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Apr;34(4):625-632
pubmed: 29177579
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):606-39
pubmed: 26914678
Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1595-606
pubmed: 2225364
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 13;15:51
pubmed: 23763839
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Nov 16;12:66
pubmed: 21080924
Am J Cardiol. 1997 May 15;79(10):1319-22
pubmed: 9165150
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):1032-42
pubmed: 2312957
Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1233-8
pubmed: 10982536
Circulation. 2010 Jun 8;121(22):2462-508
pubmed: 20479157
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):1216-1221
pubmed: 28329392
Radiology. 2015 Sep;276(3):732-40
pubmed: 25923223
Circulation. 2003 Apr 15;107(14):1877-83
pubmed: 12668522
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):159-170
pubmed: 29687292
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;15(7):753-60
pubmed: 24451179
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Oct;23(5):1187-1226
pubmed: 27392702
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May;10(5):565-577
pubmed: 28017383
Radiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:219297
pubmed: 24377046
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Oct;20(4):979-85
pubmed: 1527310
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;45(4):553-8
pubmed: 15708703
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):962-974
pubmed: 30010838
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):1107-1118
pubmed: 29168158
Anesth Analg. 1989 Mar;68(3):261-9
pubmed: 2919764
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Dec;101(6):1678-84
pubmed: 16946029
Radiographics. 1994 Mar;14(2):307-32
pubmed: 8190956