Non-Bismuth Quadruple Therapy, Sequential Therapy or High-Dose Esomeprazole and Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Prospective Randomized Study.
dual high dose therapy
eradication
helicobacter pylori
non-bismuth quadruple therapy
sequential therapy
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Dec 2020
02 Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
8
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study aims were to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of non-bismuth quadruple therapy with sequential therapy and dual therapy with high dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin as an empirical first-line approach to eradicate Prospective randomized trial included 393 patients infected with The baseline demographic clinical and endoscopic characteristics were similar among the three groups. The intention to treat (ITT) analysis was performed in 130, 132, and 131 patients in the BT, SQ, and CT groups, respectively. The eradication rates in ITT were 64.6%, 83.1%, and 92.3%, respectively, in the BT, SQ and CT groups (p = 0.0001). The eradication rates per protocol were 67.7%, 88.5%, and 95.3% (p = 0.0001), respectively, in the BT, SQ, and CT groups. The CT and SQ groups were higher than the BT group (p = 0,0001) but no significant results were seen in the eradication rate between CT and SQ, both in PP analysis and in ITT analysis (p = 0.09). The prevalence of the side effects following the non-bismuth quadruple therapy was 38.2%, significantly higher (p = 0.001) than the BT group (13.80%) and SQ group (22%). There were no significant differences in compliance among the three therapies (p = 0.16). This study found that non-bismuth quadruple therapy yielded a higher
Identifiants
pubmed: 33409077
doi: 10.7759/cureus.11837
pmc: PMC7781545
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11837Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Zeriouh et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010 Jan;6(1):29-41
pubmed: 19968574
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Oct;50(10):1916-20
pubmed: 16187197
Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):473-479
pubmed: 29353050
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):34-42
pubmed: 22580412
Gastroenterology. 1996 Aug;111(2):521-3
pubmed: 8690219
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan;74(1):1-13
pubmed: 28990120
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2014 Nov 15;5(4):392-9
pubmed: 25400982
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):895-905.e5
pubmed: 25460556
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;11(2):323-9
pubmed: 9146770
Gut. 2012 May;61(5):646-64
pubmed: 22491499
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jan;8(1):36-41.e1
pubmed: 19804842
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;37(4):416-21
pubmed: 23168228
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;69(9):1709-15
pubmed: 23695545
Am J Ther. 2017 Jul/Aug;24(4):e393-e398
pubmed: 26495881
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Oct;8(10):888-9
pubmed: 2512133
Intern Med. 2015;54(7):703-10
pubmed: 25832929
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 Jul;16(7):778-82
pubmed: 20799536
Gut. 2017 Jan;66(1):6-30
pubmed: 27707777
Gastroenterology. 1995 May;108(5):1412-7
pubmed: 7729633
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 10;347(15):1175-86
pubmed: 12374879
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 14;20(18):5461-73
pubmed: 24833876
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Apr;20(2):280-322
pubmed: 17428887
Ann Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct-Dec;28(4):448-51
pubmed: 26423014
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Aug;48(8):888-92
pubmed: 27257049
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;30(9):1338-45
pubmed: 25867718