Fully digital PET is unaffected by any deterioration in TOF resolution and TOF image quality in the wide range of routine PET count rates.
Count rate
Digital PET
Image quality
Time-of-flight
Journal
EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2021
06 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
accepted:
30
11
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
8
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital PET involving silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) provides an enhanced time-of-flight (TOF) resolution as compared with photomultiplier (PMT)-based PET, but also a better prevention of the count-related rises in dead time and pile-up effects mainly due to smaller trigger domains (i.e., the detection surfaces associated with each trigger circuit). This study aimed to determine whether this latter property could help prevent against deteriorations in TOF resolution and TOF image quality in the wide range of PET count rates documented in clinical routine. Variations, according to count rates, in timing resolution and in TOF-related enhancement of the quality of phantom images were compared between the first fully digital PET (Vereos) and a PMT-based PET (Ingenuity). Single-count rate values were additionally extracted from the list-mode data of routine analog- and digital-PET exams at each 500-ms interval, in order to determine the ranges of routine PET count rates. Routine PET count rates were lower for the Vereos than for the Ingenuity. For Ingenuity, the upper limits were estimated at approximately 21.7 and 33.2 Mcps after injection of respectively 3 and 5 MBq.kg Contrary to the Ingenuity PMT-based PET, the Vereos fully digital PET is unaffected by any deterioration in TOF resolution and consequently, in the quality of TOF images, in the wide range of routine PET count rates. This advantage is even more striking with higher count-rates for which the preferential use of digital PET should be further recommended (i.e., dynamic PET recording, higher injected activities).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33409746
doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00344-5
pii: 10.1186/s40658-020-00344-5
pmc: PMC7788141
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1Références
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Feb 27;64(5):055012
pubmed: 30630146
J Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;56(9):1378-85
pubmed: 26159588
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Aug 21;65(17):17TR01
pubmed: 32109891
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Feb 21;7(1):11
pubmed: 32086646
J Nucl Med. 2019 Apr;60(4):561-567
pubmed: 30361382
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Dec 1;5(1):29
pubmed: 30506174
Clin Nucl Med. 2019 Apr;44(4):301-302
pubmed: 30789394
EJNMMI Res. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):61
pubmed: 31300962
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Jul 21;59(14):3843-59
pubmed: 24955921
J Nucl Med. 2005 May;46(5):859-67
pubmed: 15872361
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Jun 19;7(1):42
pubmed: 32562010
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Jan;37(1):181-200
pubmed: 19915839
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Sep-Oct;10(5):845-50
pubmed: 3489018
Nucl Med Commun. 2019 Mar;40(3):270-277
pubmed: 30489435
J Nucl Med. 2008 Mar;49(3):462-70
pubmed: 18287269
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul;46(8):1745-1750
pubmed: 30617960
J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):237-45
pubmed: 20080882
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(9):1511-1518
pubmed: 28450566
EJNMMI Phys. 2015 Dec;2(1):26
pubmed: 26501827
J Nucl Med. 2020 Jan;61(1):129-135
pubmed: 31253742
J Nucl Med. 2020 Oct;61(10):1448-1454
pubmed: 32060217
J Nucl Med. 2020 Nov;61(11):1684-1690
pubmed: 32198313
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Jan 6;7(1):1
pubmed: 31907664
EJNMMI Phys. 2019 May 10;6(1):8
pubmed: 31076884
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Apr 25;7(1):23
pubmed: 32335787
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2017 May 16;2017:5260305
pubmed: 29097926
Med Phys. 2019 Jul;46(7):3025-3033
pubmed: 31069816
EJNMMI Phys. 2019 Dec 10;6(1):22
pubmed: 31823084
J Nucl Med. 2015 Jan;56(1):98-105
pubmed: 25525181
J Nucl Med. 2007 Mar;48(3):471-80
pubmed: 17332626
EJNMMI Res. 2018 Nov 6;8(1):97
pubmed: 30402779