The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey.
Croatia
/ epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Databases, Factual
Female
Hospitals
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ statistics & numerical data
Waiting Lists
Watchful Waiting
Journal
Croatian medical journal
ISSN: 1332-8166
Titre abrégé: Croat Med J
Pays: Croatia
ID NLM: 9424324
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Dec 2020
31 Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
27
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to economic strength, and utilization was expressed as the average number of exams per machine. We compared the waiting times for 2018 and utilization for 2015 according to hospital category (high and low level) and economic strength by county. The waiting time was longer for MRI compared with CT, 268 vs 77.61 days. Overall CT waiting time was in the unfavorable European Health Consumer Index category. High-level hospitals had longer waiting time for MRI and CT. The waiting time positively correlated with economic strength for MRI (P=0.019), but not for CT. In low-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 104 to 6032, whereas CT utilization ranged from 48 to 17852. In high-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 3846 to 11 026, while CT utilization ranged from 503 to 17 234. CT (P=0.041) and MRI (P=0.031) utilization in high-level hospitals was significantly higher than in low-level hospitals. The waiting times for CT and MRI were exceptionally long regardless of the hospital category, with highly varying utilization. Croatia performed more exams per scanner compared with other EU countries, but not significantly so. High-level hospitals' utilization was significantly higher than that of low-level hospitals, and CT utilization was significantly higher than EU average, while the difference for MRI utilization was not significant.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
538-546Références
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct;57(5):551-7
pubmed: 24119268
BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 14;2(6):
pubmed: 23242480
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):95-9
pubmed: 22140193
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(2):147-155
pubmed: 29455686
Health Policy. 2014 Dec;118(3):292-303
pubmed: 25217838
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3629-37
pubmed: 26003789
Health Econ. 2009 Nov;18(11):1295-306
pubmed: 19191260
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Oct 20;25:99
pubmed: 28292062
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e013059
pubmed: 27884848
Coll Antropol. 2009 Apr;33 Suppl 1:121-30
pubmed: 19563157
Health Policy. 2005 May;72(2):201-15
pubmed: 15802155
Croat Med J. 2007 Oct;48(5):653-66
pubmed: 17948951
Radiography (Lond). 2019 May;25(2):148-154
pubmed: 30955688
Clin Radiol. 2009 Mar;64(3):284-90
pubmed: 19185658
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(4):573-91
pubmed: 10303061