Drivers of Medicare Spending: A 15-Year Review of Radiation Oncology Charges Allowed by the Medicare Physician/Supplier Fee-for-Service Program Compared With Other Specialties.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2021
Historique:
received: 06 10 2020
revised: 20 12 2020
accepted: 30 12 2020
pubmed: 8 1 2021
medline: 27 8 2021
entrez: 7 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed a new radiation oncology alternative payment model aimed at reducing expenditures. We examined changes in aggregate physician Medicare charges allowed per specialty to provide contemporary context to proposed changes and hypothesize that radiation oncology charges remained stable through 2017. Medicare physician/supplier utilization, program payments, and balance billing for original Medicare beneficiaries, by physician specialty, were analyzed from 2002 to 2017. Total allowed charges under the physician/supplier fee-for-service program, inflation-adjusted charges, and percent of total charges billed per specialty were examined. We adjusted for inflation using the consumer price index for medical care from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Total allowed charges increased from $83 billion in 2002 to $138 billion in 2017. The specialties accounting for the most charges billed to Medicare were internal medicine and ophthalmology. Radiation oncology charges accounted for 1.2%, 1.6%, and 1.4% of total charges allowed by Medicare in 2002, 2012, and 2017, respectively. Radiation oncology charges allowed increased 44% from 2002 to 2012 ($987.6 million to $1.42 billion) but decreased by 19% from 2012 to 2017 ($1.15 billion), adjusted for inflation. Total charges allowed by internal medicine decreased 2% from 2002 to 2012 ($8.53 to $8.36 billion), adjusted for inflation, and decreased 16% from 2012 to 2017 ($7.05 billion). When adjusting for inflation, ophthalmology charges increased 18% from 2002 to 2012 ($4.53 to $5.36 billion) and increased 3% from 2012 to 2017 ($5.5 billion). Radiation oncology physician charges represent a small fraction of total Medicare expenses and are not a driver for Medicare spending. Aggregate inflation-adjusted charges by radiation oncology have dramatically declined in the past 5 years and represent a stable fraction of total Medicare charges. The need to target radiation oncology with cost-cutting measures may be overstated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33412264
pii: S0360-3016(20)34747-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.051
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

322-327

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Meriem Mokhtech (M)

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: Meriem.mokhtech@yale.edu.

James H Laird (JH)

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Sean Maroongroge (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Diana Zhu (D)

Department of Economics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Benjamin Falit (B)

Pacific Cancer Institute, Wailuku, Hawaii.

Peter A S Johnstone (PAS)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tampa, Florida.

Constantine A Mantz (CA)

21st Century Oncology, Fort Myers, Florida.

Ronald D Ennis (RD)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Howard M Sandler (HM)

Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Arie P Dosoretz (AP)

Advocate Radiation Oncology, Fort Myers, Florida.

James B Yu (JB)

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH