Prospective, historically controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new paediatric formulation of nifurtimox in children aged 0 to 17 years with Chagas disease one year after treatment (CHICO).
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
05
06
2020
accepted:
18
10
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nifurtimox is a recommended treatment for Chagas disease, but data from treated children are limited. We investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nifurtimox administered as divisible, dispersible 30 mg and 120 mg tablets in children with Chagas disease. In this blinded, controlled study conducted January 2016-July 2018, 330 patients aged <18 years from 25 medical centres across three South American countries were randomised 2:1 to nifurtimox 10-20 mg/kg/day (aged <12 years) or 8-10 mg/kg/day (aged ≥12 years) for 60 days (n = 219), or for 30 days plus placebo for 30 days (n = 111) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02625974). The primary outcome was anti-Trypanosoma cruzi serological response (negative seroconversion or seroreduction ≥20% in mean optical density from baseline determined by two conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) at 12 months in the 60-day treatment group versus historical placebo controls. Nifurtimox for 60 days achieved negative seroconversion (n = 10) and seroreduction (n = 62) in 72 patients (serological response 32.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.4%, 39.3%, of all treated patients), confirming superiority relative to the upper 95% CI of 16% for controls. In patients aged <8 months, 10/12 treated for 60 days (83.3%) and 5/7 treated for 30 days (71.4%) achieved negative seroconversion. Overall serological response was lower for 30-day than for 60-day nifurtimox (between-treatment difference 14.0% [95% CI 3.7%, 24.2%]). The frequency of T. cruzi-positive quantitative polymerase chain reactions decreased substantially from baseline levels (60-day regimen 53.4% versus 1.4%; 30-day regimen 51.4% versus 4.5%). Study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), which were observed in 62 patients (28.3%) treated for 60 days and 29 patients (26.1%) treated for 30 days, were generally mild or moderate and resolved without sequelae; 4.2% of all TEAEs led to nifurtimox discontinuation. Age- and weight-adjusted nifurtimox for 60 days achieved a serological response at 12 months post-treatment that was superior to historical placebo, was well tolerated and had a favourable safety profile in children with Chagas disease. Although, at 1 year serological follow-up, efficacy of the shorter nifurtimox treatment was not comparable to the 60-day treatment regimen for the overall study population, further long-term follow-up of the patients will provide important information about the progress of serological conversion in children treated with nifurtimox, as well as the potential efficacy difference between the two regimens over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33412557
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008912
pii: PNTD-D-20-00987
pmc: PMC7790535
doi:
Substances chimiques
Trypanocidal Agents
0
Nifurtimox
M84I3K7C2O
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02625974']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0008912Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: UG is an employee of Bayer AG. EH is an employee of Bayer US LLC. GM received personal fees from Bayer during the conduct of the study.
Références
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015 May;110(3):422-32
pubmed: 25946151
Medicina (B Aires). 2003;63(1):37-40
pubmed: 12673959
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 29;13(8):e0007668
pubmed: 31465522
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Sep;5(9):e1314
pubmed: 21909451
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 1;49(11):1667-74
pubmed: 19877966
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Oct;59(4):526-9
pubmed: 9790423
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;13(4):342-8
pubmed: 23395248
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2013;55(3):
pubmed: 23740013
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2012 Feb;29(1):82-6
pubmed: 22552516
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007 Apr;146(4):601-20
pubmed: 16626984
Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1407-13
pubmed: 8937280
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 May;82(5):838-45
pubmed: 20439964
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Oct;25(10):1168-1181
pubmed: 32677284
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):456-66
pubmed: 26222561
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(4):e419
pubmed: 19381287
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md). 2017 May;25(3):118-125
pubmed: 37200690
Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2018;10(3):373-388
pubmed: 30220883
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Feb 27;9(2):e0003465
pubmed: 25723465
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:652985
pubmed: 26583124
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):15-20
pubmed: 26952178
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Oct;24(4):655-81
pubmed: 21976603
Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1388-402
pubmed: 20399979
Medicina (B Aires). 1985;45(5):553-8
pubmed: 3939553
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;18(4):419-430
pubmed: 29352704
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Feb;4(1):269-86
pubmed: 18728716
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Jan;15(1):87-93
pubmed: 19968839
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Sep;21(3):551-5
pubmed: 8527542