[Quality Assurance in Intensive Care Medicine: Peer Reviews and Quality Indicators].

Qualitätssicherung in der Intensivmedizin: Peer Reviews und Qualitätsindikatoren.

Journal

Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
ISSN: 1439-1074
Titre abrégé: Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9109478

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez: 7 1 2021
pubmed: 8 1 2021
medline: 12 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Goal-oriented quality management in health care is an essential tool to provide good medical practice and treatment. It aims at a patient-centred case management with high transparency of structural and clinical process aspects, as well as patient outcome. An objective and comprehensive description of clinical care includes the use of quality indicators. However, the appliance of those indicators falls short, when the evaluation of quality is not followed by recommendations for improvement.As a highly specified area in health care provided in hospitals, intensive care medicine is characterized by complex interprofessional and multidisciplinary approaches. In addition, critical care units are an expensive resource. In order to provide an economic and yet high quality patient care, treatments should be evidence-based, and cost-drivers must be analysed for their effectiveness on patient-outcome.Various methods of quality assurance allow for a formative evaluation of intensive care units by peer reviews, including the use of quality indicators. This article focuses on peer review systems currently applied in German hospitals, and particularly describes quality indicators that have been established by DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Society of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine). It also addresses the need for a professional dialogue between equal partners. This has to accompany each peer review that aims at an improvement in quality of critical patient care. Für eine gute medizinische Behandlungsqualität ist ein zielorientiertes Qualitätsmanagement notwendig. Dadurch werden zentrale Aspekte des Behandlungsprozesses transparent, um Entwicklungspotenziale zu identifizieren und durch externe Qualitätssicherung vergleichbar zu sein. Dieser Beitrag stellt die hierfür wesentlichen Verfahren vor – mit dem Fokus auf Verfahren der formativen Evaluation (Peer Review) und prozessbasierten Qualitätsindikatoren.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (ger)
Für eine gute medizinische Behandlungsqualität ist ein zielorientiertes Qualitätsmanagement notwendig. Dadurch werden zentrale Aspekte des Behandlungsprozesses transparent, um Entwicklungspotenziale zu identifizieren und durch externe Qualitätssicherung vergleichbar zu sein. Dieser Beitrag stellt die hierfür wesentlichen Verfahren vor – mit dem Fokus auf Verfahren der formativen Evaluation (Peer Review) und prozessbasierten Qualitätsindikatoren.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33412600
doi: 10.1055/a-1130-4950
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

ger

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

12-27

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH