Understanding the clinical reasoning processes involved in the management of multimorbidity in an ambulatory setting: study protocol of a stimulated recall research.
Ambulatory setting
Clinical reasoning
Multimorbidity
Primary care
Qualitative study
Stimulated recall
Study protocol
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jan 2021
07 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
21
11
2020
accepted:
16
12
2020
entrez:
8
1
2021
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Primary care physicians are at the very heart of managing patients suffering from multimorbidity. However, several studies have highlighted that some physicians feel ill-equipped to manage these kinds of complex clinical situations. Few studies are available on the clinical reasoning processes at play during the long-term management and follow-up of patients suffering from multimorbidity. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding on how the clinical reasoning of primary care physicians is affected during follow-up consultations with these patients. A qualitative research project based on semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians in an ambulatory setting will be carried out, using the video stimulated recall interview method. Participants will be filmed in their work environment during a standard consultation with a patient suffering from multimorbidity using a "button camera" (small camera) which will be pinned to their white coat. The recording will be used in a following semi-structured interview with physicians and the research team to instigate a stimulated recall. Stimulated recall is a research method that allows the investigation of cognitive processes by inviting participants to recall their concurrent thinking during an event when prompted by a video sequence recall. During this interview, participants will be prompted by different video sequence and asked to discuss them; the aim will be to encourage them to make their clinical reasoning processes explicit. Fifteen to twenty interviews are planned to reach data saturation. The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and data will be analysed according to a standard content analysis, using deductive and inductive approaches. Study results will contribute to the scientific community's overall understanding of clinical reasoning. This will subsequently allow future generation of primary care physicians to have access to more adequate trainings to manage patients suffering from multimorbidity in their practice. As a result, this will improve the quality of the patient's care and treatments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Primary care physicians are at the very heart of managing patients suffering from multimorbidity. However, several studies have highlighted that some physicians feel ill-equipped to manage these kinds of complex clinical situations. Few studies are available on the clinical reasoning processes at play during the long-term management and follow-up of patients suffering from multimorbidity. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding on how the clinical reasoning of primary care physicians is affected during follow-up consultations with these patients.
METHODS
METHODS
A qualitative research project based on semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians in an ambulatory setting will be carried out, using the video stimulated recall interview method. Participants will be filmed in their work environment during a standard consultation with a patient suffering from multimorbidity using a "button camera" (small camera) which will be pinned to their white coat. The recording will be used in a following semi-structured interview with physicians and the research team to instigate a stimulated recall. Stimulated recall is a research method that allows the investigation of cognitive processes by inviting participants to recall their concurrent thinking during an event when prompted by a video sequence recall. During this interview, participants will be prompted by different video sequence and asked to discuss them; the aim will be to encourage them to make their clinical reasoning processes explicit. Fifteen to twenty interviews are planned to reach data saturation. The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and data will be analysed according to a standard content analysis, using deductive and inductive approaches.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Study results will contribute to the scientific community's overall understanding of clinical reasoning. This will subsequently allow future generation of primary care physicians to have access to more adequate trainings to manage patients suffering from multimorbidity in their practice. As a result, this will improve the quality of the patient's care and treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33413342
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02459-w
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02459-w
pmc: PMC7792096
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31Références
Healthc Q. 2017;20(1):50-56
pubmed: 28550701
Med Teach. 2014 Sep;36(9):746-56
pubmed: 24846122
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 8;12(8):e0182608
pubmed: 28792524
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 19;12:284-293
pubmed: 30406006
Med Educ. 2005 Apr;39(4):418-27
pubmed: 15813765
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 13;3(9):e003610
pubmed: 24038011
Qual Health Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):968-75
pubmed: 21266705
Eff Clin Pract. 1998 Aug-Sep;1(1):2-4
pubmed: 10345255
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45
pubmed: 20662574
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):303-9
pubmed: 11458485
Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1178-84
pubmed: 18045370
BMJ. 2012 May 11;344:e3336
pubmed: 22581574
Med Teach. 2013;35(2):e957-62
pubmed: 22938676
Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14 Suppl 1:28-32
pubmed: 18949641
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 08;13:132
pubmed: 23565674
Educ Prim Care. 2015 Nov;26(6):410-5
pubmed: 26808937
Rev Med Suisse. 2016 May 11;12(518):917-21
pubmed: 27352585
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006172
pubmed: 25805528
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 6;8(3):e019616
pubmed: 29511015
Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):516-23
pubmed: 21436204
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):260-73
pubmed: 15710959
Med Educ. 2012 May;46(5):454-63
pubmed: 22515753
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78
pubmed: 11816692
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Dec;79(3 Pt 2):1411-25
pubmed: 7870526
Acad Med. 2004 Jun;79(6):541-8
pubmed: 15165973
Acad Med. 1995 Oct;70(10):898-931
pubmed: 7575922
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):575-85
pubmed: 24882662
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Acad Med. 2019 Sep;94(9):1310-1316
pubmed: 31460922
Med Teach. 2005 Jun;27(4):302-15
pubmed: 16024412
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;14(4):535-46
pubmed: 18798005
PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442
pubmed: 17132052
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e184-91
pubmed: 25733440
Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):2-19
pubmed: 17538823
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Apr;57(537):268-70
pubmed: 17394728
BMJ. 2013 May 02;346:f2510
pubmed: 23641032
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):7-9
pubmed: 22579042
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31(4):435-7
pubmed: 26813111
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S1-6
pubmed: 12377689
Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347-64
pubmed: 18569655
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):75-80
pubmed: 20837819
Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Mar;26(2):150-1
pubmed: 25638287
Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):579-87
pubmed: 21613378
Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):256-9
pubmed: 24821897