Widespread zoophagy and detection of Plasmodium spp. in Anopheles mosquitoes in southeastern Madagascar.


Journal

Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 18 08 2020
accepted: 07 12 2020
entrez: 8 1 2021
pubmed: 9 1 2021
medline: 10 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Malaria is a top cause of mortality on the island nation of Madagascar, where many rural communities rely on subsistence agriculture and livestock production. Understanding feeding behaviours of Anopheles in this landscape is crucial for optimizing malaria control and prevention strategies. Previous studies in southeastern Madagascar have shown that Anopheles mosquitoes are more frequently captured within 50 m of livestock. However, it remains unknown whether these mosquitoes preferentially feed on livestock. Here, mosquito blood meal sources and Plasmodium sporozoite rates were determined to evaluate patterns of feeding behaviour in Anopheles spp. and malaria transmission in southeastern Madagascar. Across a habitat gradient in southeastern Madagascar 7762 female Anopheles spp. mosquitoes were collected. Of the captured mosquitoes, 492 were visibly blood fed and morphologically identifiable, and a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to test for swine, cattle, chicken, human, and dog blood among these specimens. Host species identification was confirmed for multiple blood meals using PCR along with Sanger sequencing. Additionally, 1,607 Anopheles spp. were screened for the presence of Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax-210, and P. vivax 247 circumsporozoites (cs) by ELISA. Cattle and swine accounted, respectively, for 51% and 41% of all blood meals, with the remaining 8% split between domesticated animals and humans. Of the 1,607 Anopheles spp. screened for Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax 210, and Plasmodium vivax 247 cs-protein, 45 tested positive, the most prevalent being P. vivax 247, followed by P. vivax 210 and P. falciparum. Both variants of P. vivax were observed in secondary vectors, including Anopheles squamosus/cydippis, Anopheles coustani, and unknown Anopheles spp. Furthermore, evidence of coinfection of P. falciparum and P. vivax 210 in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) was found. Here, feeding behaviour of Anopheles spp. mosquitoes in southeastern Madagascar was evaluated, in a livestock rich landscape. These findings suggest largely zoophagic feeding behaviors of Anopheles spp., including An. gambiae s.l. and presence of both P. vivax and P. falciparum sporozoites in Anopheles spp. A discordance between P. vivax reports in mosquitoes and humans exists, suggesting high prevalence of P. vivax circulating in vectors in the ecosystem despite low reports of clinical vivax malaria in humans in Madagascar. Vector surveillance of P. vivax may be relevant to malaria control and elimination efforts in Madagascar. At present, the high proportion of livestock blood meals in Madagascar may play a role in buffering (zooprophylaxis) or amplifying (zoopotentiation) the impacts of malaria. With malaria vector control efforts focused on indoor feeding behaviours, complementary approaches, such as endectocide-aided vector control in livestock may be an effective strategy for malaria reduction in Madagascar.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Malaria is a top cause of mortality on the island nation of Madagascar, where many rural communities rely on subsistence agriculture and livestock production. Understanding feeding behaviours of Anopheles in this landscape is crucial for optimizing malaria control and prevention strategies. Previous studies in southeastern Madagascar have shown that Anopheles mosquitoes are more frequently captured within 50 m of livestock. However, it remains unknown whether these mosquitoes preferentially feed on livestock. Here, mosquito blood meal sources and Plasmodium sporozoite rates were determined to evaluate patterns of feeding behaviour in Anopheles spp. and malaria transmission in southeastern Madagascar.
METHODS METHODS
Across a habitat gradient in southeastern Madagascar 7762 female Anopheles spp. mosquitoes were collected. Of the captured mosquitoes, 492 were visibly blood fed and morphologically identifiable, and a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to test for swine, cattle, chicken, human, and dog blood among these specimens. Host species identification was confirmed for multiple blood meals using PCR along with Sanger sequencing. Additionally, 1,607 Anopheles spp. were screened for the presence of Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax-210, and P. vivax 247 circumsporozoites (cs) by ELISA.
RESULTS RESULTS
Cattle and swine accounted, respectively, for 51% and 41% of all blood meals, with the remaining 8% split between domesticated animals and humans. Of the 1,607 Anopheles spp. screened for Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax 210, and Plasmodium vivax 247 cs-protein, 45 tested positive, the most prevalent being P. vivax 247, followed by P. vivax 210 and P. falciparum. Both variants of P. vivax were observed in secondary vectors, including Anopheles squamosus/cydippis, Anopheles coustani, and unknown Anopheles spp. Furthermore, evidence of coinfection of P. falciparum and P. vivax 210 in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) was found.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Here, feeding behaviour of Anopheles spp. mosquitoes in southeastern Madagascar was evaluated, in a livestock rich landscape. These findings suggest largely zoophagic feeding behaviors of Anopheles spp., including An. gambiae s.l. and presence of both P. vivax and P. falciparum sporozoites in Anopheles spp. A discordance between P. vivax reports in mosquitoes and humans exists, suggesting high prevalence of P. vivax circulating in vectors in the ecosystem despite low reports of clinical vivax malaria in humans in Madagascar. Vector surveillance of P. vivax may be relevant to malaria control and elimination efforts in Madagascar. At present, the high proportion of livestock blood meals in Madagascar may play a role in buffering (zooprophylaxis) or amplifying (zoopotentiation) the impacts of malaria. With malaria vector control efforts focused on indoor feeding behaviours, complementary approaches, such as endectocide-aided vector control in livestock may be an effective strategy for malaria reduction in Madagascar.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33413398
doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03539-4
pii: 10.1186/s12936-020-03539-4
pmc: PMC7791646
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

25

Subventions

Organisme : USDA
ID : Young Investigator Award
Organisme : Auburn University
ID : OVPRED

Références

Malar J. 2010 Dec 20;9:365
pubmed: 21171970
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Mar 19;12(1):124
pubmed: 30890165
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jan 28;7:52
pubmed: 24472517
Malar J. 2007 Jul 30;6:100
pubmed: 17663787
Malar J. 2014 Mar 28;13:125
pubmed: 24678587
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e101699
pubmed: 25050703
Malar J. 2016 Feb 02;15:57
pubmed: 26838369
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990 Aug;43(2):107-15
pubmed: 2202220
Malar J. 2019 Nov 20;18(1):368
pubmed: 31747974
Malar J. 2015 Dec 01;14:475
pubmed: 26620552
Malar J. 2011 Mar 24;10:68
pubmed: 21435266
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009 Sep;103(6):539-47
pubmed: 19695159
Malar J. 2018 Dec 10;17(1):462
pubmed: 30526594
J Med Entomol. 1992 Sep;29(5):854-7
pubmed: 1404266
Malar J. 2007 Feb 27;6:23
pubmed: 17326831
Malar J. 2011 Dec 13;10:356
pubmed: 22165904
Nat Commun. 2011;2:266
pubmed: 21468018
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 23;116(30):15086-15095
pubmed: 31285346
Malar J. 2020 Jan 15;19(1):26
pubmed: 31941494
Malar J. 2016 Mar 08;15:146
pubmed: 26957210
Malar J. 2014 Aug 23;13:330
pubmed: 25149656
Malar J. 2015 Aug 12;14:313
pubmed: 26264913
Trends Parasitol. 2016 Mar;32(3):187-196
pubmed: 26826784
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Oct 25;6(1):160
pubmed: 29157310
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Dec;81(6):1023-9
pubmed: 19996432
Evolution. 2013 Apr;67(4):1218-30
pubmed: 23550770
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jul 5;13(7):e0007176
pubmed: 31276491
Malar J. 2018 Dec 18;17(1):479
pubmed: 30563533
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jan 10;10(1):18
pubmed: 28069065
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 Jul;37(1):37-41
pubmed: 2886070
Trends Parasitol. 2011 Oct;27(10):423-8
pubmed: 21727027
Malar J. 2015 Sep 17;14:351
pubmed: 26377691
Parasit Vectors. 2018 May 4;11(1):287
pubmed: 29728135
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1964 Mar;58:154-8
pubmed: 14128582
Malar J. 2015 Dec 10;13 Suppl 1:496
pubmed: 26651335
Trends Parasitol. 2017 Mar;33(3):156-158
pubmed: 28065670
Malar J. 2019 Mar 26;18(1):102
pubmed: 30914051
J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov 15;206(10):1622-9
pubmed: 22966127
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):741
pubmed: 31959845
Malar J. 2017 Sep 15;16(1):373
pubmed: 28915892
Trends Parasitol. 2017 Oct;33(10):763-774
pubmed: 28668377
Malar J. 2011 Jul 18;10:195
pubmed: 21767376
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993 May-Jun;87(3):322-4
pubmed: 8236408
Malar J. 2015 Jan 28;14:35
pubmed: 25627277
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Aug;73(2):336-42
pubmed: 16103600
Acta Trop. 2010 Dec;116(3):240-5
pubmed: 20804715
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):22042-22050
pubmed: 32843339
J Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;215(5):790-797
pubmed: 28007921
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Mar 07;8:145
pubmed: 25889982
Malar J. 2013 May 07;12:153
pubmed: 23647969
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 2;11(1):122
pubmed: 29499751
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011 Aug;11(8):1173-9
pubmed: 21142969
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Oct;49(4):520-9
pubmed: 8214283
Malar J. 2018 Aug 20;17(1):302
pubmed: 30126462
J Med Entomol. 1988 Jan;25(1):9-16
pubmed: 3357176
Malar J. 2019 Jul 1;18(1):221
pubmed: 31262309
Malar J. 2011 Apr 09;10:80
pubmed: 21477321
J Med Entomol. 2001 Nov;38(6):822-8
pubmed: 11761380
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 30;5(12):e15829
pubmed: 21209854
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Nov 21;7(11):e2489
pubmed: 24278487
Malar J. 2020 Feb 14;19(1):73
pubmed: 32059675
J Med Entomol. 2016 Nov;53(6):1482-1487
pubmed: 27297214
Malar J. 2016 Feb 24;15:114
pubmed: 26944051
Med Vet Entomol. 2001 Mar;15(1):50-7
pubmed: 11297101
Malar J. 2019 Dec 27;18(1):445
pubmed: 31881898

Auteurs

Micaela Finney (M)

College of Science and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

Benjamin A McKenzie (BA)

School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

Bernadette Rabaovola (B)

Centre Val Bio, Ranomafana, Madagascar.

Alice Sutcliffe (A)

Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Entomology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Ellen Dotson (E)

Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Entomology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Sarah Zohdy (S)

School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. ykr2@cdc.gov.
College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. ykr2@cdc.gov.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH