Use of proton pump inhibitors to treat persistent throat symptoms: multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Double-Blind Method
Esophagitis, Peptic
/ complications
Female
Gastroesophageal Reflux
/ complications
Humans
Lansoprazole
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Pharyngitis
/ drug therapy
Proton Pump Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Quality of Life
United Kingdom
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 01 2021
07 01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
8
1
2021
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
14
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to treat persistent throat symptoms. Pragmatic, double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. Eight ear, nose, and throat outpatient clinics, United Kingdom. 346 patients aged 18 years or older with persistent throat symptoms who were randomised according to recruiting centre and baseline severity of symptoms (mild or severe): 172 to lansoprazole and 174 to placebo. Random blinded allocation (1:1) to either 30 mg lansoprazole twice daily or matched placebo twice daily for 16 weeks. Primary outcome was symptomatic response at 16 weeks measured using the total reflux symptom index (RSI) score. Secondary outcomes included symptom response at 12 months, quality of life, and throat appearances. Of 1427 patients initially screened for eligibility, 346 were recruited. The mean age of the study sample was 52.2 (SD 13.7) years, 196 (57%) were women, and 162 (47%) had severe symptoms at presentation; these characteristics were balanced across treatment arms. The primary analysis was performed on 220 patients who completed the primary outcome measure within a window of 14-20 weeks. Mean RSI scores were similar between treatment arms at baseline: lansoprazole 22.0 (95% confidence interval 20.4 to 23.6) and placebo 21.7 (20.5 to 23.0). Improvements (reduction in RSI score) were observed in both groups-score at 16 weeks: lansoprazole 17.4 (15.5 to19.4) and placebo 15.6 (13.8 to 17.3). No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment arms: estimated difference 1.9 points (95% confidence interval -0.3 to 4.2 points; P=0.096) adjusted for site and baseline symptom severity. Lansoprazole showed no benefits over placebo for any secondary outcome measure, including RSI scores at 12 months: lansoprazole 16.0 (13.6 to 18.4) and placebo 13.6 (11.7 to 15.5): estimated difference 2.4 points (-0.6 to 5.4 points). No evidence was found of benefit from PPI treatment in patients with persistent throat symptoms. RSI scores were similar between the lansoprazole and placebo groups after 16 weeks of treatment and at the 12 month follow-up. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN38578686 and EudraCT 2013-004249-17.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33414239
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4903
pmc: PMC7789994
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proton Pump Inhibitors
0
Lansoprazole
0K5C5T2QPG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
m4903Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 12/01/04
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: some authors had financial support from the Health and Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisation that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationship or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
J Voice. 2012 May;26(3):e123-7
pubmed: 21477986
Laryngoscope. 2019 May;129(5):1174-1187
pubmed: 30597577
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;19(3):150-4
pubmed: 21499101
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Feb 8;4:46
pubmed: 29456870
Psychosom Med. 2009 Nov;71(9):1026-31
pubmed: 19834050
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009;34(1):32-5
pubmed: 19214865
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;268(6):863-9
pubmed: 21221621
J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7
pubmed: 12150380
Gut. 2005 May;54(5):710-7
pubmed: 15831922
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 May;120(5):281-7
pubmed: 21675582
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Apr;131(4):315-20
pubmed: 15837899
Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2014 Feb 25;7:1-5
pubmed: 24653653
J Psychosom Res. 1996 Jun;40(6):603-15
pubmed: 8843039
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016 Jul 4;49(7):
pubmed: 27383119
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;101(11):2646-54
pubmed: 17037995
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;50(4):295-300
pubmed: 25906028
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6):921-6
pubmed: 21493299
Trials. 2016 Apr 01;17:175
pubmed: 27036555
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Feb;266(2):243-51
pubmed: 18506466
Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):254-60
pubmed: 16467715
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):905-11
pubmed: 23545710
Psychosomatics. 1995 Nov-Dec;36(6):570-7
pubmed: 7501789
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;269(10):2219-25
pubmed: 22576243
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Dec;16(6):516-20
pubmed: 19005322
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Jan 1;126(1):46-8
pubmed: 7059872
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jan 2;55(1):
pubmed: 31515408
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 May;264(5):513-7
pubmed: 17404773
Laryngoscope. 2001 Aug;111(8):1313-7
pubmed: 11568561
Laryngoscope. 2006 Jan;116(1):144-8
pubmed: 16481828
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343
pubmed: 29260229
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):455-9
pubmed: 19793278