Understanding Unemployment Normalization: Individual Differences in an Alternative Experience With Unemployment.
coping
individual differences
normalization
perceived health
personality
subjective well-being
unemployment
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
accepted:
27
11
2020
entrez:
8
1
2021
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
9
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Unemployment is a major concern of societies and people around the world. In addressing this phenomenon, the literature has suggested a change in unemployed people's perceptions of this transition period. In this paper, we apply a differential approach to explore the concept of unemployment normalization, an individual emotional regulation process. The results show how the global socioeconomic context and some individual and psychological variables influence the normalization of unemployment. Thus, the age of the person but also work involvement, coping strategies, locus of control, and level of self-esteem have indirect differential effects, mediated by unemployment normalization dimensions, on unemployed people's perceived health. Only neuroticism has a direct link to subjective well-being. These results offer a new understanding of the perception of unemployment and are also discussed in the area of career and vocational counseling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33414736
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.525506
pmc: PMC7782246
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
525506Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Houssemand, Thill and Pignault.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74
pubmed: 14744233
Int J Psychol. 2011 Oct;46(5):377-85
pubmed: 22044309
J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1721-47
pubmed: 17083664
J Clin Psychol. 1991 May;47(3):336-45
pubmed: 2066400
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:369-96
pubmed: 21721936
J Occup Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;10(3):200-9
pubmed: 16060724
Multivariate Behav Res. 1985 Jan 1;20(1):3-26
pubmed: 26776273
Psychol Assess. 2006 Dec;18(4):444-51
pubmed: 17154766
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Jul;5(3):323-36
pubmed: 10912496
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Aug;97(2):363-81
pubmed: 19634981
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;10:383
pubmed: 30873084
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):837-55
pubmed: 11596801
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Sep;66(9):832-8
pubmed: 21690607
Sociol Health Illn. 2013 Jun;35(5):649-65
pubmed: 23009677
Science. 1946 Jun 7;103(2684):677-80
pubmed: 17750512
BMC Public Health. 2008 Oct 14;8:355
pubmed: 18854015
Br J Med Psychol. 1990 Mar;63 ( Pt 1):43-52
pubmed: 2331451
Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):216-269
pubmed: 12696840
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):53-76
pubmed: 15641890
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):991-1011
pubmed: 25664474
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(2):163-71
pubmed: 3660006
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Oct;82(5):731-44
pubmed: 9337607
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):411-430
pubmed: 15910139
Psychol Rep. 2019 Oct;122(5):1600-1617
pubmed: 30115004
Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Spring;6(2):160-70
pubmed: 689890