The Point of View of Undergraduate Health Students on Interprofessional Collaboration: A Thematic Analysis.
clinical practice
competencies
interprofessional collaboration
interprofessional education
role of student
role of tutor
skills
student
tutor
Journal
SAGE open nursing
ISSN: 2377-9608
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101724853
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
25
09
2018
revised:
06
02
2019
accepted:
10
02
2019
entrez:
8
1
2021
pubmed:
24
4
2019
medline:
24
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interprofessional education (IPE) is essential to prepare future professionals for interprofessional collaboration (IPC). Learning together is essential for students because it is a way to understand the roles of other colleagues, improve their skills, knowledge, competencies, and attitudes to collaborate with the interprofessional teams. To explore how undergraduate students who attend IPE courses define IPC, a qualitative study using semistructured interviews followed by a thematic analysis was performed. Four main themes were identifed: IPC as a resource, requirements for IPC, emotions linked to IPC, and tutor's role to facilitate students' perception of IPC. Students considered IPE important to build IPC, where clinical placement tutors play a key role. The most important findings of the present study include the students' considerations about the importance of IPE when building their IPC definition and the key role played by the tutor during the placement in building IPC in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33415229
doi: 10.1177/2377960819835735
pii: 10.1177_2377960819835735
pmc: PMC7774347
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2377960819835735Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):74-80
pubmed: 26783858
J Prof Nurs. 2002 Jan-Feb;18(1):5
pubmed: 11859485
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58
pubmed: 21112623
ISRN Nurs. 2013 Dec 17;2013:628679
pubmed: 24455300
Soc Work Health Care. 2016 Jul;55(6):427-39
pubmed: 27116417
BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1717
pubmed: 22434089
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Nov;16(6):719-33
pubmed: 19889913
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Jul;28(5):563-71
pubmed: 17933435
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Nov;21:83-92
pubmed: 27769019
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Dec;3(4):155-62
pubmed: 23182448
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Nov 16;7(2):284-93
pubmed: 25716397
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article21
pubmed: 20678077
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Dec;72(6):643-64
pubmed: 26062612
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Dec;16(6):491-7
pubmed: 15557359
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Oct;49(10):1299-309
pubmed: 22269138
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:8-20
pubmed: 16096142
Lancet. 2014 May 24;383(9931):1824-30
pubmed: 24581683
J Interprof Care. 2006 Jan;20(1):75-8
pubmed: 16581641
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):116-25
pubmed: 23898215
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:132-47
pubmed: 16096151
Nurs Stand. 2006 May 24-30;20(37):42-7
pubmed: 16764399
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):559-568
pubmed: 28626086
J Allied Health. 2010 Fall;39 Suppl 1:196-7
pubmed: 21174039
J Interprof Care. 2014 Sep;28(5):393-9
pubmed: 24702046
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Jun;63(3):263-300
pubmed: 16651394
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1509-15
pubmed: 23969354
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Sep;60(3):291-302
pubmed: 23961790
Top Health Inf Manage. 2003 Jan-Mar;24(1):21-8
pubmed: 12674392
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Nov;14(6):716-40
pubmed: 17901183
Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Jul;12(4):182-6
pubmed: 22154483
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):1221-31
pubmed: 26043657